| Message ID | 1393411089-9550-2-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Quoting Florian Vaussard (2014-02-26 02:38:08) > When arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c calls clk_get(..., "fck"), it will > get a dummy clock and try to use it. As the rate is configured to zero, > this will result in several divisions by zero, and misconfigured > timings, with devices on the bus being lost in the La La Land. > > It is better to remove gpmc_fck from the dummy clocks, so that gpmc.c > can fail gracefully. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> Looks good to me. Regards, Mike > --- > drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c | 1 - > drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c | 1 - > drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c | 1 - > 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c > index ae00218..02517a8 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c > @@ -222,7 +222,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap44xx_clks[] = { > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk5_src_ck", "auxclk5_src_ck"), > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk5_ck", "auxclk5_ck"), > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclkreq5_ck", "auxclkreq5_ck"), > - DT_CLK("50000000.gpmc", "fck", "dummy_ck"), > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c > index 0ef9f58..08f3d1b 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c > @@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap54xx_clks[] = { > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk3_src_ck", "auxclk3_src_ck"), > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk3_ck", "auxclk3_ck"), > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclkreq3_ck", "auxclkreq3_ck"), > - DT_CLK(NULL, "gpmc_ck", "dummy_ck"), > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c > index 9977653..f7e4073 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c > @@ -262,7 +262,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk dra7xx_clks[] = { > DT_CLK(NULL, "vip1_gclk_mux", "vip1_gclk_mux"), > DT_CLK(NULL, "vip2_gclk_mux", "vip2_gclk_mux"), > DT_CLK(NULL, "vip3_gclk_mux", "vip3_gclk_mux"), > - DT_CLK(NULL, "gpmc_ck", "dummy_ck"), > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > -- > 1.8.1.2 >
* Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> [140226 12:43]: > Quoting Florian Vaussard (2014-02-26 02:38:08) > > When arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c calls clk_get(..., "fck"), it will > > get a dummy clock and try to use it. As the rate is configured to zero, > > this will result in several divisions by zero, and misconfigured > > timings, with devices on the bus being lost in the La La Land. > > > > It is better to remove gpmc_fck from the dummy clocks, so that gpmc.c > > can fail gracefully. > > > > Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> > > Looks good to me. Can that be upgraded to an ack then? Regards, Tony > > --- > > drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c | 1 - > > drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c | 1 - > > drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c | 1 - > > 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c > > index ae00218..02517a8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c > > @@ -222,7 +222,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap44xx_clks[] = { > > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk5_src_ck", "auxclk5_src_ck"), > > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk5_ck", "auxclk5_ck"), > > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclkreq5_ck", "auxclkreq5_ck"), > > - DT_CLK("50000000.gpmc", "fck", "dummy_ck"), > > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c > > index 0ef9f58..08f3d1b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c > > @@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap54xx_clks[] = { > > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk3_src_ck", "auxclk3_src_ck"), > > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk3_ck", "auxclk3_ck"), > > DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclkreq3_ck", "auxclkreq3_ck"), > > - DT_CLK(NULL, "gpmc_ck", "dummy_ck"), > > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c > > index 9977653..f7e4073 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c > > @@ -262,7 +262,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk dra7xx_clks[] = { > > DT_CLK(NULL, "vip1_gclk_mux", "vip1_gclk_mux"), > > DT_CLK(NULL, "vip2_gclk_mux", "vip2_gclk_mux"), > > DT_CLK(NULL, "vip3_gclk_mux", "vip3_gclk_mux"), > > - DT_CLK(NULL, "gpmc_ck", "dummy_ck"), > > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > > DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"), > > -- > > 1.8.1.2 > >
On 02/28/2014 07:28 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> [140226 12:43]: >> Quoting Florian Vaussard (2014-02-26 02:38:08) >>> When arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c calls clk_get(..., "fck"), it will >>> get a dummy clock and try to use it. As the rate is configured to zero, >>> this will result in several divisions by zero, and misconfigured >>> timings, with devices on the bus being lost in the La La Land. >>> >>> It is better to remove gpmc_fck from the dummy clocks, so that gpmc.c >>> can fail gracefully. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> >> >> Looks good to me. > > Can that be upgraded to an ack then? Looks good to me also. Acked-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> > > Regards, > > Tony > >>> --- >>> drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c | 1 - >>> drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c | 1 - >>> drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c | 1 - >>> 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c >>> index ae00218..02517a8 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c >>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c >>> @@ -222,7 +222,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap44xx_clks[] = { >>> DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk5_src_ck", "auxclk5_src_ck"), >>> DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk5_ck", "auxclk5_ck"), >>> DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclkreq5_ck", "auxclkreq5_ck"), >>> - DT_CLK("50000000.gpmc", "fck", "dummy_ck"), >>> DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), >>> DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), >>> DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"), >>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c >>> index 0ef9f58..08f3d1b 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c >>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c >>> @@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap54xx_clks[] = { >>> DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk3_src_ck", "auxclk3_src_ck"), >>> DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk3_ck", "auxclk3_ck"), >>> DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclkreq3_ck", "auxclkreq3_ck"), >>> - DT_CLK(NULL, "gpmc_ck", "dummy_ck"), >>> DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), >>> DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), >>> DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"), >>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c >>> index 9977653..f7e4073 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c >>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c >>> @@ -262,7 +262,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk dra7xx_clks[] = { >>> DT_CLK(NULL, "vip1_gclk_mux", "vip1_gclk_mux"), >>> DT_CLK(NULL, "vip2_gclk_mux", "vip2_gclk_mux"), >>> DT_CLK(NULL, "vip3_gclk_mux", "vip3_gclk_mux"), >>> - DT_CLK(NULL, "gpmc_ck", "dummy_ck"), >>> DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), >>> DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), >>> DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"), >>> -- >>> 1.8.1.2 >>>
diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c index ae00218..02517a8 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c @@ -222,7 +222,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap44xx_clks[] = { DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk5_src_ck", "auxclk5_src_ck"), DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk5_ck", "auxclk5_ck"), DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclkreq5_ck", "auxclkreq5_ck"), - DT_CLK("50000000.gpmc", "fck", "dummy_ck"), DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"), diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c index 0ef9f58..08f3d1b 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c @@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk omap54xx_clks[] = { DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk3_src_ck", "auxclk3_src_ck"), DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclk3_ck", "auxclk3_ck"), DT_CLK(NULL, "auxclkreq3_ck", "auxclkreq3_ck"), - DT_CLK(NULL, "gpmc_ck", "dummy_ck"), DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"), diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c index 9977653..f7e4073 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c @@ -262,7 +262,6 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk dra7xx_clks[] = { DT_CLK(NULL, "vip1_gclk_mux", "vip1_gclk_mux"), DT_CLK(NULL, "vip2_gclk_mux", "vip2_gclk_mux"), DT_CLK(NULL, "vip3_gclk_mux", "vip3_gclk_mux"), - DT_CLK(NULL, "gpmc_ck", "dummy_ck"), DT_CLK("omap_i2c.1", "ick", "dummy_ck"), DT_CLK("omap_i2c.2", "ick", "dummy_ck"), DT_CLK("omap_i2c.3", "ick", "dummy_ck"),
When arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c calls clk_get(..., "fck"), it will get a dummy clock and try to use it. As the rate is configured to zero, this will result in several divisions by zero, and misconfigured timings, with devices on the bus being lost in the La La Land. It is better to remove gpmc_fck from the dummy clocks, so that gpmc.c can fail gracefully. Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> --- drivers/clk/ti/clk-44xx.c | 1 - drivers/clk/ti/clk-54xx.c | 1 - drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c | 1 - 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)