Message ID | 1397226211-29775-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Sylwester, On 11.04.2014 16:23, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > Exynos4212/4412 has different clock for the PL330 MDMA, ensure > the clock is properly assigned for these newer SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi > index c4a9306..19589c6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi > @@ -243,4 +243,10 @@ > clock-names = "biu", "ciu"; > status = "disabled"; > }; > + > + amba { > + mdma@12850000 { > + clocks = <&clock CLK_MDMA2>; > + }; > + }; > }; > Since the ID for CLK_MDMA2 was added mistakenly, instead of reusing CLK_MDMA and it was not used by any device tree files anyway, I believe the better fix would be to simply change the clock definition in Exynos 4 clock driver to use CLK_MDMA for both SoC families. Best regards, Tomasz
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi index c4a9306..19589c6 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi @@ -243,4 +243,10 @@ clock-names = "biu", "ciu"; status = "disabled"; }; + + amba { + mdma@12850000 { + clocks = <&clock CLK_MDMA2>; + }; + }; };