From patchwork Thu Jun 12 07:58:45 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bo Shen X-Patchwork-Id: 4339891 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C484A9F314 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 08:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A34202FF for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 08:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A1F4202E9 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 08:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Wuzuu-0005WN-HE; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 07:59:24 +0000 Received: from nasmtp01.atmel.com ([192.199.1.245] helo=DVREDG01.corp.atmel.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Wuzup-0005Q6-Fa; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 07:59:19 +0000 Received: from sjogate2.atmel.com (10.42.103.223) by DVREDG01.corp.atmel.com (10.42.103.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 01:58:51 -0600 Received: from Dev4Android.corp.atmel.com ([10.217.2.46]) by sjogate2.atmel.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s5C7pMQE016370; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 00:51:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Bo Shen To: Subject: [PATCH v2] mtd: atmel_nand: make ecc parameters same as definition Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:58:45 +0800 Message-ID: <1402559925-20910-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20140612_005919_589039_5C89F16B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.87 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Cc: josh.wu@atmel.com, Bo Shen , nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP If the ecc parameter is not the same as definition, when the mtd core check these parameters, it will give the error result. Take the following as an example: Calculate how many bits can be corrected in one page. According to the ecc parameters definition, one page correct bits = (mtd->writesize * ecc->strength) / ecc->size take the following use case as an example: mtd->writesize = 2048 bytes ecc->strength = 4 bytes (for 512 bytes) before this patch, the ecc->size = 2048, so the result is 4 bytes. after this patch, the ecc->size = 512, so the result is 16 bytes. So, align the ecc parameters the same as definition to correct this kind of error. Signed-off-by: Bo Shen Acked-by: Josh Wu --- Changes in v2: - Enhancement the commit message. drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c index 4ce181a..4f5348f 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c @@ -861,12 +861,11 @@ static int pmecc_correction(struct mtd_info *mtd, u32 pmecc_stat, uint8_t *buf, { struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv; struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv; - int i, err_nbr, eccbytes; + int i, err_nbr; uint8_t *buf_pos; int total_err = 0; - eccbytes = nand_chip->ecc.bytes; - for (i = 0; i < eccbytes; i++) + for (i = 0; i < nand_chip->ecc.total; i++) if (ecc[i] != 0xff) goto normal_check; /* Erased page, return OK */ @@ -928,7 +927,7 @@ static int atmel_nand_pmecc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page) { struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv; - int eccsize = chip->ecc.size; + int eccsize = chip->ecc.size * chip->ecc.steps; uint8_t *oob = chip->oob_poi; uint32_t *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos; uint32_t stat; @@ -1169,8 +1168,7 @@ static int atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev, goto err; } - /* ECC is calculated for the whole page (1 step) */ - nand_chip->ecc.size = mtd->writesize; + nand_chip->ecc.size = sector_size; /* set ECC page size and oob layout */ switch (mtd->writesize) { @@ -1185,18 +1183,20 @@ static int atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev, host->pmecc_index_of = host->pmecc_rom_base + host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset; - nand_chip->ecc.steps = 1; + nand_chip->ecc.steps = host->pmecc_sector_number; nand_chip->ecc.strength = cap; - nand_chip->ecc.bytes = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector * + nand_chip->ecc.bytes = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector; + nand_chip->ecc.total = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector * host->pmecc_sector_number; - if (nand_chip->ecc.bytes > mtd->oobsize - 2) { + if (nand_chip->ecc.total > mtd->oobsize - 2) { dev_err(host->dev, "No room for ECC bytes\n"); err_no = -EINVAL; goto err; } pmecc_config_ecc_layout(&atmel_pmecc_oobinfo, mtd->oobsize, - nand_chip->ecc.bytes); + nand_chip->ecc.total); + nand_chip->ecc.layout = &atmel_pmecc_oobinfo; break; case 512: