diff mbox

video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

Message ID 1420548302-11489-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Sudip Mukherjee Jan. 6, 2015, 12:45 p.m. UTC
continue is not needed at the end of a for loop

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Sergei Shtylyov Jan. 6, 2015, 6:31 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello.

On 01/06/2015 03:45 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

> continue is not needed at the end of a for loop

> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> ---
>   drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
>   	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
>   		if (bpp_values[i] == info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
>   			reg_bpp = i;
> -			continue;
>   		}

    {} are not needed any more either. ;-)

[...]

WBR, Sergei
Sudip Mukherjee Jan. 7, 2015, 4:46 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 09:31:39PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 01/06/2015 03:45 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> 
> >continue is not needed at the end of a for loop
> 
> >Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> >---
> >  drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> >diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
> >--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
> >  	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> >  		if (bpp_values[i] == info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
> >  			reg_bpp = i;
> >-			continue;
> >  		}
> 
>    {} are not needed any more either. ;-)

i have noticed that but thought that will be again a different type of change in a single patch.
but now it seems that this patch will introduce a new checkpatch warning, so i should have corrected that in it.
i will send a v2.

thanks
sudip

> 
> [...]
> 
> WBR, Sergei
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@  static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
 	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
 		if (bpp_values[i] == info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
 			reg_bpp = i;
-			continue;
 		}
 	}