From patchwork Tue Apr 21 11:34:48 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yijing Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 6247801 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF5C9F1C4 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2364E202AE for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35832018E for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YkWuk-000350-W4; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:04:31 +0000 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YkWhC-0006tu-PX for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:50:32 +0000 Received: from 172.24.2.119 (EHLO szxeml431-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CKC39825; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:38:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.175.100.166) by szxeml431-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:38:20 +0800 From: Yijing Wang To: Bjorn Helgaas Subject: [PATCH v10 29/29] PCI: Remove pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:34:48 +0800 Message-ID: <1429616088-10249-30-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.1 In-Reply-To: <1429616088-10249-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> References: <1429616088-10249-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.100.166] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20150421_045031_518074_956F058E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.76 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Yijing Wang , Guan Xuetao , Russell King , x86@kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Rusty Russell , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Thomas Gleixner , Yinghai Lu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dja@axtens.net, Liviu Dudau , Tony Luck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiang Liu , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Now we save the domain number in pci_host_bridge, we could remove pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() and clean the domain member in pci_bus. Also move pci_host_assign_domain_nr() to drivers/pci/host-bridge.c for simplicity. Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang --- drivers/pci/host-bridge.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/pci/pci.c | 72 --------------------------------------------- drivers/pci/pci.h | 9 ----- drivers/pci/probe.c | 11 ++----- include/linux/pci.h | 3 -- 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c index 5ae9ab8..1b5b27d 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c @@ -5,12 +5,80 @@ #include #include #include +#include +#include #include "pci.h" static LIST_HEAD(pci_host_bridge_list); static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_host_mutex); +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS +static atomic_t __domain_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(-1); + +int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) +{ + return atomic_inc_return(&__domain_nr); +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC +static int pci_assign_domain_nr(struct device *dev) +{ + static int use_dt_domains = -1; + int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(dev->of_node); + + /* + * Check DT domain and use_dt_domains values. + * + * If DT domain property is valid (domain >= 0) and + * use_dt_domains != 0, the DT assignment is valid since this means + * we have not previously allocated a domain number by using + * pci_get_new_domain_nr(); we should also update use_dt_domains to + * 1, to indicate that we have just assigned a domain number from + * DT. + * + * If DT domain property value is not valid (ie domain < 0), and we + * have not previously assigned a domain number from DT + * (use_dt_domains != 1) we should assign a domain number by + * using the: + * + * pci_get_new_domain_nr() + * + * API and update the use_dt_domains value to keep track of method we + * are using to assign domain numbers (use_dt_domains = 0). + * + * All other combinations imply we have a platform that is trying + * to mix domain numbers obtained from DT and pci_get_new_domain_nr(), + * which is a recipe for domain mishandling and it is prevented by + * invalidating the domain value (domain = -1) and printing a + * corresponding error. + */ + if (domain >= 0 && use_dt_domains) { + use_dt_domains = 1; + } else if (domain < 0 && use_dt_domains != 1) { + use_dt_domains = 0; + domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr(); + } else { + dev_err(dev, "Node %s has inconsistent \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n", + dev->of_node->full_name); + domain = -1; + } + + return domain; +} +#endif +#endif + +static void pci_host_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_host_bridge *host, + int domain) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC + host->domain = pci_assign_domain_nr(host->dev.parent); +#else + host->domain = domain; +#endif +} + static void pci_release_host_bridge_dev(struct device *dev) { struct resource_entry *entry; diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index d5cbea8..1538a74 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c @@ -10,8 +10,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include -#include #include #include #include @@ -4520,76 +4518,6 @@ static void pci_no_domains(void) #endif } -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS -static atomic_t __domain_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(-1); - -int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) -{ - return atomic_inc_return(&__domain_nr); -} - -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC -static int pci_assign_domain_nr(struct device *dev) -{ - static int use_dt_domains = -1; - int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(dev->of_node); - - /* - * Check DT domain and use_dt_domains values. - * - * If DT domain property is valid (domain >= 0) and - * use_dt_domains != 0, the DT assignment is valid since this means - * we have not previously allocated a domain number by using - * pci_get_new_domain_nr(); we should also update use_dt_domains to - * 1, to indicate that we have just assigned a domain number from - * DT. - * - * If DT domain property value is not valid (ie domain < 0), and we - * have not previously assigned a domain number from DT - * (use_dt_domains != 1) we should assign a domain number by - * using the: - * - * pci_get_new_domain_nr() - * - * API and update the use_dt_domains value to keep track of method we - * are using to assign domain numbers (use_dt_domains = 0). - * - * All other combinations imply we have a platform that is trying - * to mix domain numbers obtained from DT and pci_get_new_domain_nr(), - * which is a recipe for domain mishandling and it is prevented by - * invalidating the domain value (domain = -1) and printing a - * corresponding error. - */ - if (domain >= 0 && use_dt_domains) { - use_dt_domains = 1; - } else if (domain < 0 && use_dt_domains != 1) { - use_dt_domains = 0; - domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr(); - } else { - dev_err(dev, "Node %s has inconsistent \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n", - dev->of_node->full_name); - domain = -1; - } - - return domain; -} - -void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent) -{ - bus->domain_nr = pci_assign_domain_nr(parent); -} -#endif -#endif - -void pci_host_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_host_bridge *host, int domain) -{ -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC - host->domain = pci_assign_domain_nr(host->dev.parent); -#else - host->domain = domain; -#endif -} - /** * pci_ext_cfg_avail - can we access extended PCI config space? * diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h index 0432889..e279147 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h @@ -323,16 +323,7 @@ static inline int pci_dev_specific_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe) struct pci_host_bridge *pci_find_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus); -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC -void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent); -#else -static inline void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, - struct device *parent) -{ -} -#endif struct resource_entry *pci_busn_resource(struct list_head *resources); -void pci_host_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_host_bridge *host, int domain); struct pci_host_bridge *pci_create_host_bridge(struct device *parent, int domain, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources, struct pci_host_bridge_ops *ops); diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index c9bee34..164225e 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ void pci_read_bridge_bases(struct pci_bus *child) } } -static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_bus(struct pci_bus *parent) +static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_bus(void) { struct pci_bus *b; @@ -500,10 +500,6 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_bus(struct pci_bus *parent) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&b->resources); b->max_bus_speed = PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN; b->cur_bus_speed = PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN; -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC - if (parent) - b->domain_nr = parent->domain_nr; -#endif return b; } @@ -650,7 +646,7 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_child_bus(struct pci_bus *parent, /* * Allocate a new bus, and inherit stuff from the parent.. */ - child = pci_alloc_bus(parent); + child = pci_alloc_bus(); if (!child) return NULL; @@ -1875,14 +1871,13 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus( return NULL; bus = busn_res->res->start; parent = bridge->dev.parent; - b = pci_alloc_bus(NULL); + b = pci_alloc_bus(); if (!b) return NULL; b->sysdata = dev_get_drvdata(&bridge->dev); b->ops = ops; b->number = b->busn_res.start = bus; - pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(b, parent); bridge->bus = b; b->bridge = get_device(&bridge->dev); diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index 1ea69c7..c167503 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -469,9 +469,6 @@ struct pci_bus { unsigned char primary; /* number of primary bridge */ unsigned char max_bus_speed; /* enum pci_bus_speed */ unsigned char cur_bus_speed; /* enum pci_bus_speed */ -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC - int domain_nr; -#endif char name[48];