diff mbox

ARM: imx: correct Audio/Video PLL rate calculation formula

Message ID 1429810455-22447-1-git-send-email-b20788@freescale.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Anson Huang April 23, 2015, 5:34 p.m. UTC
The audio/video PLL's rate calculation formula is as below in RM:

Fref * (DIV_SELECT + NUM / DENOM),

in original clk-pllv3's code, below code is used:

(parent_rate * div) + ((parent_rate / mfd) * mfn

as it does NOT consider the float data using div, so below
calculation formula should be used as a decent method:

(parent_rate * div) + ((parent_rate * mfn) / mfd)

and we also need to consider parent_rate * mfd may exceed
a 32 bit value, 64 bit value should be used.

Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <b20788@freescale.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Shawn Guo April 27, 2015, 2:29 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:34:15AM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> The audio/video PLL's rate calculation formula is as below in RM:
> 
> Fref * (DIV_SELECT + NUM / DENOM),
> 
> in original clk-pllv3's code, below code is used:
> 
> (parent_rate * div) + ((parent_rate / mfd) * mfn
> 
> as it does NOT consider the float data using div, so below
> calculation formula should be used as a decent method:
> 
> (parent_rate * div) + ((parent_rate * mfn) / mfd)
> 
> and we also need to consider parent_rate * mfd may exceed
> a 32 bit value, 64 bit value should be used.

Can you provide some real world data (PLL output frequency) to
demonstrate the difference between old and new formula?

Shawn

> 
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <b20788@freescale.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
> index 641ebc5..f83cf0d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
> @@ -203,8 +203,12 @@ static unsigned long clk_pllv3_av_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  	u32 mfn = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_NUM_OFFSET);
>  	u32 mfd = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_DENOM_OFFSET);
>  	u32 div = readl_relaxed(pll->base) & pll->div_mask;
> +	u64 temp64 = parent_rate;
>  
> -	return (parent_rate * div) + ((parent_rate / mfd) * mfn);
> +	temp64 *= mfn;
> +	do_div(temp64, mfd);
> +
> +	return (parent_rate * div) + temp64;
>  }
>  
>  static long clk_pllv3_av_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> -- 
> 1.9.1
>
Shawn Guo April 29, 2015, 6:08 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Anson,

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 05:47:00PM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:29:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:34:15AM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > The audio/video PLL's rate calculation formula is as below in RM:
> > > 
> > > Fref * (DIV_SELECT + NUM / DENOM),
> > > 
> > > in original clk-pllv3's code, below code is used:
> > > 
> > > (parent_rate * div) + ((parent_rate / mfd) * mfn
> > > 
> > > as it does NOT consider the float data using div, so below
> > > calculation formula should be used as a decent method:
> > > 
> > > (parent_rate * div) + ((parent_rate * mfn) / mfd)
> > > 
> > > and we also need to consider parent_rate * mfd may exceed
> > > a 32 bit value, 64 bit value should be used.
> > 
> > Can you provide some real world data (PLL output frequency) to
> > demonstrate the difference between old and new formula?
> > 
> > Shawn
> > 
> 
> I happen to meet this issue on i.MX7D, on i.MX7D, DRAM PLL is a
> Audio/Video type PLL, the target freq is 1066MHz, the register
> settings are as below:
> 
> PLL_DDRn: 8060202C   -> div = 0x2C
> DDR_NUM: 06AAAC4D    -> mfn = 0x6AAAC4D
> DDR_DENOM: 100003EC  -> mfd = 0x100003EC
> 
> parent_rate = 24MHz.
> 
> with old formula, the (parent_rate / mfd) * mfn = 0
> with new formula, the (parent_rate * mfn) / mfd = 10
> 
> so old formula gets PLL_DDR = 1056MHz, new formuls gets
> PLL_DDR = 1066MHz.
> 
> For other Audio/Video PLL, the result is also different, but
> the difference is less then 1MHz.
> 
> That is why I do this patch.

Okay.  Can you please add these data into commit log and resend the
patch?  Also, all i.MX clock drivers are being moved into
drivers/clk/imx/, so please rebase your patch on my imx/clk-move
branch.

Shawn
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
index 641ebc5..f83cf0d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
@@ -203,8 +203,12 @@  static unsigned long clk_pllv3_av_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	u32 mfn = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_NUM_OFFSET);
 	u32 mfd = readl_relaxed(pll->base + PLL_DENOM_OFFSET);
 	u32 div = readl_relaxed(pll->base) & pll->div_mask;
+	u64 temp64 = parent_rate;
 
-	return (parent_rate * div) + ((parent_rate / mfd) * mfn);
+	temp64 *= mfn;
+	do_div(temp64, mfd);
+
+	return (parent_rate * div) + temp64;
 }
 
 static long clk_pllv3_av_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,