Message ID | 1432644564-24746-12-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 26.05.2015 14:49, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Based on Jiang Liu's common interface to support PCI host bridge > init and refactoring of MMCONFIG, this patch using information > from ACPI MCFG table and IO/irq resources from _CRS to init > ARM64 PCI hostbridge, then PCI will work on ARM64. > > This patch is based on Mark Salter and Tomasz Nowicki's work. > > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> > Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> > CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > CC: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> > CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com> > CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 7 ++ > arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 245 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/pci/pci.c | 26 +++-- > 3 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index 9b80428..8e4b789 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -276,6 +276,13 @@ config PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC > config PCI_SYSCALL > def_bool PCI > > +config PCI_MMCONFIG > + def_bool y > + select PCI_ECAM > + select HAVE_PCI_ECAM > + select GENERIC_PCI_ECAM HAVE_PCI_ECAM and GENERIC_PCI_ECAM should be selected by platform. > + depends on ACPI I think we should depend on PCI too. Tomasz > + > source "drivers/pci/Kconfig" > source "drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig" > source "drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig" > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > index 4095379..d1629dc 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > @@ -11,12 +11,15 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/acpi.h> > +#include <linux/ecam.h> > #include <linux/init.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/mm.h> > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > #include <linux/of_pci.h> > #include <linux/of_platform.h> > +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <asm/pci-bridge.h> > @@ -43,31 +46,251 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res, > */ > int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) > { > - dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); > + if (acpi_disabled) > + dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); > > return 0; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > +int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) > +{ > + struct pci_controller *sd = bridge->bus->sysdata; > + > + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, sd->companion); > + return 0; > +} > + > +void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > +{ > + acpi_pci_add_bus(bus); > +} > + > +void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > +{ > + acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus); > +} > + > +int pcibios_enable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > + if (!pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev)) > + acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev); > + return 0; > +} > + > +int pcibios_disable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > + if (!pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev)) > + acpi_pci_irq_disable(dev); > + return 0; > +} > + > +int pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int bars) > +{ > + int err; > + > + err = pci_enable_resources(dev, bars); > + if (err < 0) > + return err; > + > + return pcibios_enable_irq(dev); > +} > + > +static int __init pcibios_assign_resources(void) > +{ > + struct pci_bus *root_bus; > + > + if (acpi_disabled) > + return 0; > + > + list_for_each_entry(root_bus, &pci_root_buses, node) { > + pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root_bus); > + pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(root_bus); > + } > + return 0; > +} > /* > - * raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access. > + * fs_initcall comes after subsys_initcall, so we know acpi scan > + * has run. > */ > -int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, > - unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val) > +fs_initcall(pcibios_assign_resources); > + > +static int pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, > + int size, u32 *value) > { > - return -ENXIO; > + return raw_pci_read(pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, > + devfn, where, size, value); > } > > -int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, > - unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val) > +static int pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, > + int size, u32 value) > { > - return -ENXIO; > + return raw_pci_write(pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, > + devfn, where, size, value); > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > +struct pci_ops pci_root_ops = { > + .read = pci_read, > + .write = pci_write, > +}; > + > +struct pci_root_info { > + struct acpi_pci_root_info common; > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG > + bool mcfg_added; > + u8 start_bus; > + u8 end_bus; > +#endif > +}; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG > +static int pci_add_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > +{ > + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg; > + struct pci_root_info *info; > + struct acpi_pci_root *root = ci->root; > + int err, seg = ci->controller.segment; > + > + info = container_of(ci, struct pci_root_info, common); > + info->start_bus = (u8)root->secondary.start; > + info->end_bus = (u8)root->secondary.end; > + info->mcfg_added = false; > + > + rcu_read_lock(); > + cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, info->start_bus); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + if (cfg) > + return 0; > + > + cfg = pci_mmconfig_alloc(seg, info->start_bus, info->end_bus, > + root->mcfg_addr); > + if (!cfg) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + err = pci_mmconfig_inject(cfg); > + if (!err) > + info->mcfg_added = true; > + > + return err; > +} > + > +static void pci_remove_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > +{ > + struct pci_root_info *info; > + > + info = container_of(ci, struct pci_root_info, common); > + if (info->mcfg_added) { > + pci_mmconfig_delete(ci->controller.segment, info->start_bus, > + info->end_bus); > + info->mcfg_added = false; > + } > +} > +#else > +static int pci_add_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void pci_remove_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) { } > +#endif > + > +static int pci_acpi_root_init_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > +{ > + return pci_add_mmconfig_region(ci); > +} > + > +static void pci_acpi_root_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > +{ > + struct pci_root_info *info; > + > + info = container_of(ci, struct pci_root_info, common); > + pci_remove_mmconfig_region(ci); > + kfree(info); > +} > + > +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci, > + int status) > +{ > + struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp; > + > + resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) { > + struct resource *res = entry->res; > + > + /* > + * Special handling for ARM IO range > + * TODO: need to move pci_register_io_range() function out > + * of drivers/of/address.c for both used by DT and ACPI > + */ > + if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) { > + unsigned long port; > + int err; > + resource_size_t length = res->end - res->start; > + > + err = pci_register_io_range(res->start, length); > + if (err) { > + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry); > + continue; > + } > + > + port = pci_address_to_pio(res->start); > + if (port == (unsigned long)-1) { > + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry); > + continue; > + } > + > + res->start = port; > + res->end = res->start + length - 1; > + > + if (pci_remap_iospace(res, res->start) < 0) > + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry); > + } > + } > + > + return status; > +} > + > +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = { > + .pci_ops = &pci_root_ops, > + .init_info = pci_acpi_root_init_info, > + .release_info = pci_acpi_root_release_info, > + .prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources, > +}; > + > /* Root bridge scanning */ > struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root) > { > - /* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */ > - return NULL; > + struct pci_root_info *info; > + int node; > + int domain = root->segment; > + int busnum = root->secondary.start; > + struct pci_bus *bus; > + > + if (domain && !pci_domains_supported) { > + pr_warn("PCI %04x:%02x: multiple domains not supported.\n", > + domain, busnum); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle); > + info = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL, node); > + if (!info) { > + dev_err(&root->device->dev, "pci_bus %04x:%02x: ignored (out of memory)\n", > + domain, busnum); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &info->common); > + > + /* After the PCI-E bus has been walked and all devices discovered, > + * configure any settings of the fabric that might be necessary. > + */ > + if (bus) { > + struct pci_bus *child; > + > + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) > + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); > + } > + > + return bus; > } > #endif > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > index acc4b6e..0268a1d 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > #include <linux/device.h> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h> > +#include <linux/acpi.h> > #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h> > #include <asm/setup.h> > #include "pci.h" > @@ -4509,7 +4510,7 @@ int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) > void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent) > { > static int use_dt_domains = -1; > - int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node); > + int domain; > > /* > * Check DT domain and use_dt_domains values. > @@ -4537,17 +4538,22 @@ void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent) > * invalidating the domain value (domain = -1) and printing a > * corresponding error. > */ > - if (domain >= 0 && use_dt_domains) { > - use_dt_domains = 1; > - } else if (domain < 0 && use_dt_domains != 1) { > - use_dt_domains = 0; > - domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr(); > + if (acpi_disabled) { > + domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node); > + if (domain >= 0 && use_dt_domains) { > + use_dt_domains = 1; > + } else if (domain < 0 && use_dt_domains != 1) { > + use_dt_domains = 0; > + domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr(); > + } else { > + dev_err(parent, "Node %s has inconsistent \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n", > + parent->of_node->full_name); > + domain = -1; > + } > } else { > - dev_err(parent, "Node %s has inconsistent \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n", > - parent->of_node->full_name); > - domain = -1; > + struct pci_controller *sd = bus->sysdata; > + domain = sd->segment; > } > - > bus->domain_nr = domain; > } > #endif >
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:49:24PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Based on Jiang Liu's common interface to support PCI host bridge > init and refactoring of MMCONFIG, this patch using information > from ACPI MCFG table and IO/irq resources from _CRS to init > ARM64 PCI hostbridge, then PCI will work on ARM64. > > This patch is based on Mark Salter and Tomasz Nowicki's work. > > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> > Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> > CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > CC: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> > CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com> > CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 7 ++ > arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 245 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/pci/pci.c | 26 +++-- > 3 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index 9b80428..8e4b789 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -276,6 +276,13 @@ config PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC > config PCI_SYSCALL > def_bool PCI > > +config PCI_MMCONFIG > + def_bool y > + select PCI_ECAM > + select HAVE_PCI_ECAM > + select GENERIC_PCI_ECAM > + depends on ACPI > + > source "drivers/pci/Kconfig" > source "drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig" > source "drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig" > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > index 4095379..d1629dc 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > @@ -11,12 +11,15 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/acpi.h> > +#include <linux/ecam.h> > #include <linux/init.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/mm.h> > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > #include <linux/of_pci.h> > #include <linux/of_platform.h> > +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <asm/pci-bridge.h> > @@ -43,31 +46,251 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res, > */ > int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) > { > - dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); > + if (acpi_disabled) > + dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); > > return 0; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > +int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) > +{ > + struct pci_controller *sd = bridge->bus->sysdata; > + > + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, sd->companion); > + return 0; > +} > + > +void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > +{ > + acpi_pci_add_bus(bus); > +} > + > +void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > +{ > + acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus); > +} > + > +int pcibios_enable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > + if (!pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev)) > + acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev); > + return 0; > +} > + > +int pcibios_disable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > + if (!pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev)) > + acpi_pci_irq_disable(dev); > + return 0; > +} > + > +int pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int bars) > +{ > + int err; > + > + err = pci_enable_resources(dev, bars); > + if (err < 0) > + return err; > + > + return pcibios_enable_irq(dev); > +} > + > +static int __init pcibios_assign_resources(void) > +{ > + struct pci_bus *root_bus; > + > + if (acpi_disabled) > + return 0; > + > + list_for_each_entry(root_bus, &pci_root_buses, node) { > + pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root_bus); > + pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(root_bus); > + } > + return 0; > +} I'm starting to sound like a stuck record (and getting bored of it myself!), but none of this looks arch-specific. Can it be moved into the core? Will
On 2015/5/27 1:13, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:49:24PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> Based on Jiang Liu's common interface to support PCI host bridge >> init and refactoring of MMCONFIG, this patch using information >> from ACPI MCFG table and IO/irq resources from _CRS to init >> ARM64 PCI hostbridge, then PCI will work on ARM64. >> >> This patch is based on Mark Salter and Tomasz Nowicki's work. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> >> Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> >> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> >> CC: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> >> CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com> >> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 7 ++ >> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 245 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> drivers/pci/pci.c | 26 +++-- >> 3 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig >> index 9b80428..8e4b789 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig >> @@ -276,6 +276,13 @@ config PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC >> config PCI_SYSCALL >> def_bool PCI >> >> +config PCI_MMCONFIG >> + def_bool y >> + select PCI_ECAM >> + select HAVE_PCI_ECAM >> + select GENERIC_PCI_ECAM >> + depends on ACPI >> + >> source "drivers/pci/Kconfig" >> source "drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig" >> source "drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig" >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c >> index 4095379..d1629dc 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c >> @@ -11,12 +11,15 @@ >> */ >> >> #include <linux/acpi.h> >> +#include <linux/ecam.h> >> #include <linux/init.h> >> #include <linux/io.h> >> #include <linux/kernel.h> >> #include <linux/mm.h> >> +#include <linux/of_address.h> >> #include <linux/of_pci.h> >> #include <linux/of_platform.h> >> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> >> #include <linux/slab.h> >> >> #include <asm/pci-bridge.h> >> @@ -43,31 +46,251 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res, >> */ >> int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) >> { >> - dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); >> + if (acpi_disabled) >> + dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); >> >> return 0; >> } >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI >> +int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) >> +{ >> + struct pci_controller *sd = bridge->bus->sysdata; >> + >> + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, sd->companion); >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) >> +{ >> + acpi_pci_add_bus(bus); >> +} >> + >> +void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) >> +{ >> + acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus); >> +} >> + >> +int pcibios_enable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) >> +{ >> + if (!pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev)) >> + acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev); >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +int pcibios_disable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) >> +{ >> + if (!pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev)) >> + acpi_pci_irq_disable(dev); >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +int pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int bars) >> +{ >> + int err; >> + >> + err = pci_enable_resources(dev, bars); >> + if (err < 0) >> + return err; >> + >> + return pcibios_enable_irq(dev); >> +} >> + >> +static int __init pcibios_assign_resources(void) >> +{ >> + struct pci_bus *root_bus; >> + >> + if (acpi_disabled) >> + return 0; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(root_bus, &pci_root_buses, node) { >> + pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root_bus); >> + pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(root_bus); >> + } >> + return 0; >> +} > > I'm starting to sound like a stuck record (and getting bored of it > myself!), but none of this looks arch-specific. Can it be moved into the > core? Hi Will, Kindly reminder, there's a pending patch set to change the way to manage IRQ for pci devices, which affects pcibios_enable_irq()/pcibios_enable_device() and friends. Please refer to https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/6/989 Thanks! Gerry > > Will >
On 2015?05?26? 23:12, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > On 26.05.2015 14:49, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> Based on Jiang Liu's common interface to support PCI host bridge >> init and refactoring of MMCONFIG, this patch using information >> from ACPI MCFG table and IO/irq resources from _CRS to init >> ARM64 PCI hostbridge, then PCI will work on ARM64. >> >> This patch is based on Mark Salter and Tomasz Nowicki's work. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> >> Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> >> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> >> CC: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> >> CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com> >> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 7 ++ >> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 245 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> drivers/pci/pci.c | 26 +++-- >> 3 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig >> index 9b80428..8e4b789 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig >> @@ -276,6 +276,13 @@ config PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC >> config PCI_SYSCALL >> def_bool PCI >> >> +config PCI_MMCONFIG >> + def_bool y >> + select PCI_ECAM >> + select HAVE_PCI_ECAM >> + select GENERIC_PCI_ECAM > HAVE_PCI_ECAM and GENERIC_PCI_ECAM should be selected by platform. OK. > >> + depends on ACPI > I think we should depend on PCI too. Since ACPI depends on PCI, denpends on PCI is duplicate I think. Thanks Hanjun
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 9b80428..8e4b789 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -276,6 +276,13 @@ config PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC config PCI_SYSCALL def_bool PCI +config PCI_MMCONFIG + def_bool y + select PCI_ECAM + select HAVE_PCI_ECAM + select GENERIC_PCI_ECAM + depends on ACPI + source "drivers/pci/Kconfig" source "drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig" source "drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig" diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c index 4095379..d1629dc 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c @@ -11,12 +11,15 @@ */ #include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/ecam.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/mm.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/of_pci.h> #include <linux/of_platform.h> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <asm/pci-bridge.h> @@ -43,31 +46,251 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res, */ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) { - dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); + if (acpi_disabled) + dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0); return 0; } +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI +int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) +{ + struct pci_controller *sd = bridge->bus->sysdata; + + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bridge->dev, sd->companion); + return 0; +} + +void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ + acpi_pci_add_bus(bus); +} + +void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ + acpi_pci_remove_bus(bus); +} + +int pcibios_enable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + if (!pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev)) + acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev); + return 0; +} + +int pcibios_disable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + if (!pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev)) + acpi_pci_irq_disable(dev); + return 0; +} + +int pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int bars) +{ + int err; + + err = pci_enable_resources(dev, bars); + if (err < 0) + return err; + + return pcibios_enable_irq(dev); +} + +static int __init pcibios_assign_resources(void) +{ + struct pci_bus *root_bus; + + if (acpi_disabled) + return 0; + + list_for_each_entry(root_bus, &pci_root_buses, node) { + pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root_bus); + pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(root_bus); + } + return 0; +} /* - * raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access. + * fs_initcall comes after subsys_initcall, so we know acpi scan + * has run. */ -int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, - unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val) +fs_initcall(pcibios_assign_resources); + +static int pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, + int size, u32 *value) { - return -ENXIO; + return raw_pci_read(pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, + devfn, where, size, value); } -int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, - unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val) +static int pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, + int size, u32 value) { - return -ENXIO; + return raw_pci_write(pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, + devfn, where, size, value); } -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI +struct pci_ops pci_root_ops = { + .read = pci_read, + .write = pci_write, +}; + +struct pci_root_info { + struct acpi_pci_root_info common; +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG + bool mcfg_added; + u8 start_bus; + u8 end_bus; +#endif +}; + +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG +static int pci_add_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) +{ + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg; + struct pci_root_info *info; + struct acpi_pci_root *root = ci->root; + int err, seg = ci->controller.segment; + + info = container_of(ci, struct pci_root_info, common); + info->start_bus = (u8)root->secondary.start; + info->end_bus = (u8)root->secondary.end; + info->mcfg_added = false; + + rcu_read_lock(); + cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, info->start_bus); + rcu_read_unlock(); + if (cfg) + return 0; + + cfg = pci_mmconfig_alloc(seg, info->start_bus, info->end_bus, + root->mcfg_addr); + if (!cfg) + return -ENOMEM; + + err = pci_mmconfig_inject(cfg); + if (!err) + info->mcfg_added = true; + + return err; +} + +static void pci_remove_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) +{ + struct pci_root_info *info; + + info = container_of(ci, struct pci_root_info, common); + if (info->mcfg_added) { + pci_mmconfig_delete(ci->controller.segment, info->start_bus, + info->end_bus); + info->mcfg_added = false; + } +} +#else +static int pci_add_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) +{ + return 0; +} + +static void pci_remove_mmconfig_region(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) { } +#endif + +static int pci_acpi_root_init_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) +{ + return pci_add_mmconfig_region(ci); +} + +static void pci_acpi_root_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) +{ + struct pci_root_info *info; + + info = container_of(ci, struct pci_root_info, common); + pci_remove_mmconfig_region(ci); + kfree(info); +} + +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci, + int status) +{ + struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp; + + resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) { + struct resource *res = entry->res; + + /* + * Special handling for ARM IO range + * TODO: need to move pci_register_io_range() function out + * of drivers/of/address.c for both used by DT and ACPI + */ + if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) { + unsigned long port; + int err; + resource_size_t length = res->end - res->start; + + err = pci_register_io_range(res->start, length); + if (err) { + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry); + continue; + } + + port = pci_address_to_pio(res->start); + if (port == (unsigned long)-1) { + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry); + continue; + } + + res->start = port; + res->end = res->start + length - 1; + + if (pci_remap_iospace(res, res->start) < 0) + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry); + } + } + + return status; +} + +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = { + .pci_ops = &pci_root_ops, + .init_info = pci_acpi_root_init_info, + .release_info = pci_acpi_root_release_info, + .prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources, +}; + /* Root bridge scanning */ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root) { - /* TODO: Should be revisited when implementing PCI on ACPI */ - return NULL; + struct pci_root_info *info; + int node; + int domain = root->segment; + int busnum = root->secondary.start; + struct pci_bus *bus; + + if (domain && !pci_domains_supported) { + pr_warn("PCI %04x:%02x: multiple domains not supported.\n", + domain, busnum); + return NULL; + } + + node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle); + info = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL, node); + if (!info) { + dev_err(&root->device->dev, "pci_bus %04x:%02x: ignored (out of memory)\n", + domain, busnum); + return NULL; + } + + bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, &info->common); + + /* After the PCI-E bus has been walked and all devices discovered, + * configure any settings of the fabric that might be necessary. + */ + if (bus) { + struct pci_bus *child; + + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); + } + + return bus; } #endif diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index acc4b6e..0268a1d 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include <linux/device.h> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h> +#include <linux/acpi.h> #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h> #include <asm/setup.h> #include "pci.h" @@ -4509,7 +4510,7 @@ int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent) { static int use_dt_domains = -1; - int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node); + int domain; /* * Check DT domain and use_dt_domains values. @@ -4537,17 +4538,22 @@ void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent) * invalidating the domain value (domain = -1) and printing a * corresponding error. */ - if (domain >= 0 && use_dt_domains) { - use_dt_domains = 1; - } else if (domain < 0 && use_dt_domains != 1) { - use_dt_domains = 0; - domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr(); + if (acpi_disabled) { + domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node); + if (domain >= 0 && use_dt_domains) { + use_dt_domains = 1; + } else if (domain < 0 && use_dt_domains != 1) { + use_dt_domains = 0; + domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr(); + } else { + dev_err(parent, "Node %s has inconsistent \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n", + parent->of_node->full_name); + domain = -1; + } } else { - dev_err(parent, "Node %s has inconsistent \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n", - parent->of_node->full_name); - domain = -1; + struct pci_controller *sd = bus->sysdata; + domain = sd->segment; } - bus->domain_nr = domain; } #endif