@@ -364,12 +364,12 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info,
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(rootbus_handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
&segment);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
- if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev)) {
+ if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev->bus)) {
acpi_get_name(rootbus_handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME,
&name_buffer);
printk(KERN_ERR
"%s: Segment number mismatch, 0x%llx vs 0x%x for: %s\n",
- __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev),
+ __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev->bus),
(char *)name_buffer.pointer);
kfree(name_buffer.pointer);
return 1;
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info,
/* Build up the pcidev_info.pdi_slot_host_handle */
host_devfn = get_host_devfn(pcidev_match.handle, rootbus_handle);
(*pcidev_info)->pdi_slot_host_handle =
- ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev) << 40) |
+ ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) << 40) |
/* bus == 0 */
host_devfn;
return 0;
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ sn_io_slot_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev)
panic("%s: Unable to alloc memory for sn_irq_info", __func__);
/* Call to retrieve pci device information needed by kernel. */
- status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev),
+ status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus),
(u64) dev->bus->number,
dev->devfn,
(u64) __pa(pcidev_info),
Kbuild test robot found we passed a pci_dev * to pci_domain_nr(). In old IA64 specific pci_domain_nr() It was macro defines: #define PCI_CONTROLLER(busdev) ((struct pci_controller *) busdev->sysdata) #define pci_domain_nr(busdev) (PCI_CONTROLLER(busdev)->segment) Both pci_dev * and pci_bus * have opaque sysdata, so IA64 specific pci_domain_nr() could get the pci_controller and return the exact domain number, but now we use common pci_domain_nr() functions, so we should fix this warning. Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> --- arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c | 6 +++--- arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)