| Message ID | 1444979960-24100-1-git-send-email-Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:19:15PM +0800, Minghuan Lian wrote: > ls_pcie_establish_link() does not do any real operation, except > to wait for the linkup establishment. In fact, this is not > necessary. Moreover, each PCIe controller not inserted device > will increase the Linux startup time about 200ms. > > Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> It'd be handy if there were a [0/6] cover letter where I could reply with this update about the whole series. I applied patches 1-5 to pci/host-layerscape for v4.4, thanks! I split patch 5 (adding LS1043a and LS2080a support) into one patch that removes the unused struct fields and a second patch that actually adds the LS1043a and LS2080a support. I haven't applied patch 6 because it doesn't make sense to me (more details in the response to it). I'll be happy to apply it if you explain what I'm missing. Bjorn > --- > Change log > v4: split from [PATCH v3] PCI: layerscape: Add PCIe support for LS1043a and LS2080a > > drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c | 16 ---------------- > 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c > index b2328ea1..6dd44a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c > @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > -#include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/of_pci.h> > @@ -62,27 +61,12 @@ static int ls_pcie_link_up(struct pcie_port *pp) > return 1; > } > > -static int ls_pcie_establish_link(struct pcie_port *pp) > -{ > - unsigned int retries; > - > - for (retries = 0; retries < 200; retries++) { > - if (dw_pcie_link_up(pp)) > - return 0; > - usleep_range(100, 1000); > - } > - > - dev_err(pp->dev, "phy link never came up\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > -} > - > static void ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > { > struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pp); > u32 val; > > dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > - ls_pcie_establish_link(pp); > > /* > * LS1021A Workaround for internal TKT228622 > -- > 1.9.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c index b2328ea1..6dd44a0 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ */ #include <linux/kernel.h> -#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/of_pci.h> @@ -62,27 +61,12 @@ static int ls_pcie_link_up(struct pcie_port *pp) return 1; } -static int ls_pcie_establish_link(struct pcie_port *pp) -{ - unsigned int retries; - - for (retries = 0; retries < 200; retries++) { - if (dw_pcie_link_up(pp)) - return 0; - usleep_range(100, 1000); - } - - dev_err(pp->dev, "phy link never came up\n"); - return -EINVAL; -} - static void ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) { struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pp); u32 val; dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); - ls_pcie_establish_link(pp); /* * LS1021A Workaround for internal TKT228622
ls_pcie_establish_link() does not do any real operation, except to wait for the linkup establishment. In fact, this is not necessary. Moreover, each PCIe controller not inserted device will increase the Linux startup time about 200ms. Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> --- Change log v4: split from [PATCH v3] PCI: layerscape: Add PCIe support for LS1043a and LS2080a drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)