Message ID | 1445964626-6484-2-git-send-email-jenskuske@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Jens Kuske <jenskuske@gmail.com> wrote: > Currently, the sunxi clock driver gets the name for the base factor clock > of divs clocks from the name field in factors_data. This prevents reusing > of the factor clock for clocks with same properties, but different name. > > This commit makes the divs setup function try to get a name from > clock-output-names in the devicetree. It also removes the name field where > possible and merges the sun4i PLL5 and PLL6 clocks. This patch actually removes all static declarations of the name field, which is a good thing! > > Signed-off-by: Jens Kuske <jenskuske@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c > index 9c79af0c..270de42 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c > @@ -704,21 +704,12 @@ static const struct factors_data sun4i_pll5_data __initconst = { > .enable = 31, > .table = &sun4i_pll5_config, > .getter = sun4i_get_pll5_factors, > - .name = "pll5", > -}; > - > -static const struct factors_data sun4i_pll6_data __initconst = { > - .enable = 31, > - .table = &sun4i_pll5_config, > - .getter = sun4i_get_pll5_factors, > - .name = "pll6", > }; > > static const struct factors_data sun6i_a31_pll6_data __initconst = { > .enable = 31, > .table = &sun6i_a31_pll6_config, > .getter = sun6i_a31_get_pll6_factors, > - .name = "pll6x2", > }; > > static const struct factors_data sun5i_a13_ahb_data __initconst = { > @@ -902,6 +893,7 @@ struct gates_data { > > #define SUNXI_DIVS_MAX_QTY 4 > #define SUNXI_DIVISOR_WIDTH 2 > +#define SUNXI_DIVS_BASE_NAME_MAX_LEN 8 > > struct divs_data { > const struct factors_data *factors; /* data for the factor clock */ > @@ -941,7 +933,7 @@ static const struct divs_data pll5_divs_data __initconst = { > }; > > static const struct divs_data pll6_divs_data __initconst = { > - .factors = &sun4i_pll6_data, > + .factors = &sun4i_pll5_data, > .ndivs = 4, > .div = { > { .shift = 0, .table = pll6_sata_tbl, .gate = 14 }, /* M, SATA */ > @@ -983,6 +975,8 @@ static void __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node, > struct clk_gate *gate = NULL; > struct clk_fixed_factor *fix_factor; > struct clk_divider *divider; > + struct factors_data factors = *data->factors; > + char base_name[SUNXI_DIVS_BASE_NAME_MAX_LEN]; > void __iomem *reg; > int ndivs = SUNXI_DIVS_MAX_QTY, i = 0; > int flags, clkflags; > @@ -991,8 +985,30 @@ static void __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node, > if (data->ndivs) > ndivs = data->ndivs; > > + /* Try to find a name for base factor clock */ > + for (i = 0; i < ndivs; i++) { > + if (data->div[i].self) { > + of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", > + i, &factors.name); > + break; > + } > + } > + /* If we don't have a .self clk use the first output-name up to '_' */ This actually only works for the sun4i divs clocks. sun6i-a31-pll6 uses a different naming convention. sun4i-a10-pll2 uses yet another, though that's not a divs clock. Maybe we should work on unifying them. Maxime? Other than these 2 bits of information, this patch looks good. Regards ChenYu > + if (factors.name == NULL) { > + of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", > + 0, &clk_name); > + > + for (i = 0; i < SUNXI_DIVS_BASE_NAME_MAX_LEN - 1 && > + clk_name[i] != '_' && > + clk_name[i] != '\0'; i++) > + base_name[i] = clk_name[i]; > + > + base_name[i] = '\0'; > + factors.name = base_name; > + } > + > /* Set up factor clock that we will be dividing */ > - pclk = sunxi_factors_clk_setup(node, data->factors); > + pclk = sunxi_factors_clk_setup(node, &factors); > parent = __clk_get_name(pclk); > > reg = of_iomap(node, 0); > -- > 2.6.2 >
On 30/10/15 08:46, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Jens Kuske <jenskuske@gmail.com> wrote: [..] >> @@ -991,8 +985,30 @@ static void __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node, >> if (data->ndivs) >> ndivs = data->ndivs; >> >> + /* Try to find a name for base factor clock */ >> + for (i = 0; i < ndivs; i++) { >> + if (data->div[i].self) { >> + of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", >> + i, &factors.name); >> + break; >> + } >> + } >> + /* If we don't have a .self clk use the first output-name up to '_' */ > > This actually only works for the sun4i divs clocks. sun6i-a31-pll6 uses a > different naming convention. sun4i-a10-pll2 uses yet another, though that's > not a divs clock. Maybe we should work on unifying them. Maxime? All the divs clocks I could find either have a .self (handled by the first case above) or follow this naming convention, so it should work. But if we find a better way to clean up the divs without breaking devicetree bindings (as far as I understood we must not break them, am I right there?) I'd be happy with that too. Jens > > Other than these 2 bits of information, this patch looks good. > > > Regards > ChenYu > >> + if (factors.name == NULL) { >> + of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", >> + 0, &clk_name); >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < SUNXI_DIVS_BASE_NAME_MAX_LEN - 1 && >> + clk_name[i] != '_' && >> + clk_name[i] != '\0'; i++) >> + base_name[i] = clk_name[i]; >> + >> + base_name[i] = '\0'; >> + factors.name = base_name; >> + } >> + >> /* Set up factor clock that we will be dividing */ >> - pclk = sunxi_factors_clk_setup(node, data->factors); >> + pclk = sunxi_factors_clk_setup(node, &factors); >> parent = __clk_get_name(pclk); >> >> reg = of_iomap(node, 0); >> -- >> 2.6.2 >> >
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c index 9c79af0c..270de42 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c @@ -704,21 +704,12 @@ static const struct factors_data sun4i_pll5_data __initconst = { .enable = 31, .table = &sun4i_pll5_config, .getter = sun4i_get_pll5_factors, - .name = "pll5", -}; - -static const struct factors_data sun4i_pll6_data __initconst = { - .enable = 31, - .table = &sun4i_pll5_config, - .getter = sun4i_get_pll5_factors, - .name = "pll6", }; static const struct factors_data sun6i_a31_pll6_data __initconst = { .enable = 31, .table = &sun6i_a31_pll6_config, .getter = sun6i_a31_get_pll6_factors, - .name = "pll6x2", }; static const struct factors_data sun5i_a13_ahb_data __initconst = { @@ -902,6 +893,7 @@ struct gates_data { #define SUNXI_DIVS_MAX_QTY 4 #define SUNXI_DIVISOR_WIDTH 2 +#define SUNXI_DIVS_BASE_NAME_MAX_LEN 8 struct divs_data { const struct factors_data *factors; /* data for the factor clock */ @@ -941,7 +933,7 @@ static const struct divs_data pll5_divs_data __initconst = { }; static const struct divs_data pll6_divs_data __initconst = { - .factors = &sun4i_pll6_data, + .factors = &sun4i_pll5_data, .ndivs = 4, .div = { { .shift = 0, .table = pll6_sata_tbl, .gate = 14 }, /* M, SATA */ @@ -983,6 +975,8 @@ static void __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node, struct clk_gate *gate = NULL; struct clk_fixed_factor *fix_factor; struct clk_divider *divider; + struct factors_data factors = *data->factors; + char base_name[SUNXI_DIVS_BASE_NAME_MAX_LEN]; void __iomem *reg; int ndivs = SUNXI_DIVS_MAX_QTY, i = 0; int flags, clkflags; @@ -991,8 +985,30 @@ static void __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node, if (data->ndivs) ndivs = data->ndivs; + /* Try to find a name for base factor clock */ + for (i = 0; i < ndivs; i++) { + if (data->div[i].self) { + of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", + i, &factors.name); + break; + } + } + /* If we don't have a .self clk use the first output-name up to '_' */ + if (factors.name == NULL) { + of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", + 0, &clk_name); + + for (i = 0; i < SUNXI_DIVS_BASE_NAME_MAX_LEN - 1 && + clk_name[i] != '_' && + clk_name[i] != '\0'; i++) + base_name[i] = clk_name[i]; + + base_name[i] = '\0'; + factors.name = base_name; + } + /* Set up factor clock that we will be dividing */ - pclk = sunxi_factors_clk_setup(node, data->factors); + pclk = sunxi_factors_clk_setup(node, &factors); parent = __clk_get_name(pclk); reg = of_iomap(node, 0);
Currently, the sunxi clock driver gets the name for the base factor clock of divs clocks from the name field in factors_data. This prevents reusing of the factor clock for clocks with same properties, but different name. This commit makes the divs setup function try to get a name from clock-output-names in the devicetree. It also removes the name field where possible and merges the sun4i PLL5 and PLL6 clocks. Signed-off-by: Jens Kuske <jenskuske@gmail.com> --- drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)