@@ -566,22 +566,25 @@ static int miphy365x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
miphy_phy = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*miphy_phy),
GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!miphy_phy)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!miphy_phy) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto put_child;
+ }
miphy_dev->phys[port] = miphy_phy;
phy = devm_phy_create(&pdev->dev, child, &miphy365x_ops);
if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to create PHY\n");
- return PTR_ERR(phy);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(phy);
+ goto put_child;
}
miphy_dev->phys[port]->phy = phy;
ret = miphy365x_of_probe(child, miphy_phy);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto put_child;
phy_set_drvdata(phy, miphy_dev->phys[port]);
@@ -591,12 +594,15 @@ static int miphy365x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
&miphy_phy->ctrlreg);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No sysconfig offset found\n");
- return ret;
+ goto put_child;
}
}
provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(&pdev->dev, miphy365x_xlate);
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(provider);
+put_child:
+ of_node_put(child);
+ return ret;
}
static const struct of_device_id miphy365x_of_match[] = {
for_each_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration, so a return from the middle of the loop requires an of_node_put. A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr): // <smpl> @@ expression root,e; local idexpression child; @@ for_each_child_of_node(root, child) { ... when != of_node_put(child) when != e = child ( return child; | * return ...; ) ... } // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> --- drivers/phy/phy-miphy365x.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)