From patchwork Tue Jan 5 09:57:55 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Wang Nan X-Patchwork-Id: 7953531 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CD4BEEE5 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F85203B5 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:01:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD6E203AB for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aGOOz-0006lx-NM; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 09:59:41 +0000 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aGOOl-0006QB-Ki for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 09:59:30 +0000 Received: from 172.24.1.48 (EHLO szxeml430-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.1.48]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CZI25637; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:58:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from linux-4hy3.site (10.107.193.248) by szxeml430-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.185) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:58:00 +0800 From: Wang Nan To: , Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] perf test: Improve bp_signal Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:57:55 +0000 Message-ID: <1451987875-15893-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.4 In-Reply-To: <20160104165535.GI1616@arm.com> References: <20160104165535.GI1616@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.107.193.248] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0205.568B93B4.02DD, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: eb4a673c86fecb5d1818c62853086583 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20160105_015928_285662_0CBAC702 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.00 ) X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Wang Nan , pi3orama@163.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Will Deacon [1] has some question on patch [2]. This patch improves test__bp_signal so we can test: 1. A watchpoint and a breakpoint that fire on the same instruction 2. Nested signals Test result: On x86_64 and ARM64 (result are similar with patch [2] on ARM64): # ./perf test -v signal 17: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler : --- start --- test child forked, pid 10213 count1 1, count2 3, count3 2, overflow 3, overflows_2 3 test child finished with 0 ---- end ---- Test breakpoint overflow signal handler: Ok So at least 2 cases Will doubted are handled correctly. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160104165535.GI1616@arm.com [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1450921362-198371-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Wang Nan Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- v1 -> v2: Improve readability, fix typo. Thanks to Jiri Olsa. To Jiri: I guess you will be okay to provide your SOB for your code at [3], so I add it in this v2 patch. [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160105090030.GC2192@krava.brq.redhat.com --- tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c index fb80c9e..1d1bb48 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c @@ -29,14 +29,59 @@ static int fd1; static int fd2; +static int fd3; static int overflows; +static int overflows_2; + +volatile long the_var; + + +/* + * Use ASM to ensure watchpoint and breakpoint can be triggered + * at one instruction. + */ +#if defined (__x86_64__) +extern void __test_function(volatile long *ptr); +asm ( + ".globl __test_function\n" + "__test_function:\n" + "incq (%rdi)\n" + "ret\n"); +#elif defined (__aarch64__) +extern void __test_function(volatile long *ptr); +asm ( + ".globl __test_function\n" + "__test_function:\n" + "str x30, [x0]\n" + "ret\n"); + +#else +static void __test_function(volatile long *ptr) +{ + *ptr = 0x1234; +} +#endif __attribute__ ((noinline)) static int test_function(void) { + __test_function(&the_var); + the_var++; return time(NULL); } +static void sig_handler_2(int signum __maybe_unused, + siginfo_t *oh __maybe_unused, + void *uc __maybe_unused) +{ + overflows_2++; + if (overflows_2 > 10) { + ioctl(fd1, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0); + ioctl(fd2, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0); + ioctl(fd3, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0); + } +} + static void sig_handler(int signum __maybe_unused, siginfo_t *oh __maybe_unused, void *uc __maybe_unused) @@ -54,10 +99,11 @@ static void sig_handler(int signum __maybe_unused, */ ioctl(fd1, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0); ioctl(fd2, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0); + ioctl(fd3, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0); } } -static int bp_event(void *fn, int setup_signal) +static int __event(bool is_x, void *addr, int signal) { struct perf_event_attr pe; int fd; @@ -67,8 +113,8 @@ static int bp_event(void *fn, int setup_signal) pe.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr); pe.config = 0; - pe.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_X; - pe.bp_addr = (unsigned long) fn; + pe.bp_type = is_x ? HW_BREAKPOINT_X : HW_BREAKPOINT_W; + pe.bp_addr = (unsigned long) addr; pe.bp_len = sizeof(long); pe.sample_period = 1; @@ -86,17 +132,25 @@ static int bp_event(void *fn, int setup_signal) return TEST_FAIL; } - if (setup_signal) { - fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_ASYNC); - fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, SIGIO); - fcntl(fd, F_SETOWN, getpid()); - } + fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_ASYNC); + fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, signal); + fcntl(fd, F_SETOWN, getpid()); ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_RESET, 0); return fd; } +static int bp_event(void *addr, int signal) +{ + return __event(true, addr, signal); +} + +static int wp_event(void *addr, int signal) +{ + return __event(false, addr, signal); +} + static long long bp_count(int fd) { long long count; @@ -114,7 +168,7 @@ static long long bp_count(int fd) int test__bp_signal(int subtest __maybe_unused) { struct sigaction sa; - long long count1, count2; + long long count1, count2, count3; /* setup SIGIO signal handler */ memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction)); @@ -126,21 +180,52 @@ int test__bp_signal(int subtest __maybe_unused) return TEST_FAIL; } + sa.sa_sigaction = (void *) sig_handler_2; + if (sigaction(SIGUSR1, &sa, NULL) < 0) { + pr_debug("failed setting up signal handler 2\n"); + return TEST_FAIL; + } + /* * We create following events: * - * fd1 - breakpoint event on test_function with SIGIO + * fd1 - breakpoint event on __test_function with SIGIO * signal configured. We should get signal * notification each time the breakpoint is hit * - * fd2 - breakpoint event on sig_handler without SIGIO + * fd2 - breakpoint event on sig_handler with SIGUSR1 + * configured. We should get SIGUSR1 each time when + * breakpoint is hit + * + * fd3 - watchpoint event on __test_function with SIGIO * configured. * * Following processing should happen: - * - execute test_function - * - fd1 event breakpoint hit -> count1 == 1 - * - SIGIO is delivered -> overflows == 1 - * - fd2 event breakpoint hit -> count2 == 1 + * Exec: Action: Result: + * incq (%rdi) - fd1 event breakpoint hit -> count1 == 1 + * - SIGIO is delivered + * sig_handler - fd2 event breakpoint hit -> count2 == 1 + * - SIGUSR1 is delivered + * sig_handler_2 -> overflows_2 == 1 (nested signal) + * sys_rt_sigreturn - return from sig_handler_2 + * overflows++ -> overflows = 1 + * sys_rt_sigreturn - return from sig_handler + * incq (%rdi) - fd3 event watchpoint hit -> count3 == 1 (wp and bp in one insn) + * - SIGIO is delivered + * sig_handler - fd2 event breakpoint hit -> count2 == 2 + * - SIGUSR1 is delivered + * sig_handler_2 -> overflows_2 == 2 (nested signal) + * sys_rt_sigreturn - return from sig_handler_2 + * overflows++ -> overflows = 2 + * sys_rt_sigreturn - return from sig_handler + * the_var++ - fd3 event watchpoint hit -> count3 == 2 (standalone watchpoint) + * - SIGIO is delivered + * sig_handler - fd2 event breakpoint hit -> count2 == 3 + * - SIGUSR1 is delivered + * sig_handler_2 -> overflows_2 == 3 (nested signal) + * sys_rt_sigreturn - return from sig_handler_2 + * overflows++ -> overflows == 3 + * sys_rt_sigreturn - return from sig_handler * * The test case check following error conditions: * - we get stuck in signal handler because of debug @@ -152,11 +237,13 @@ int test__bp_signal(int subtest __maybe_unused) * */ - fd1 = bp_event(test_function, 1); - fd2 = bp_event(sig_handler, 0); + fd1 = bp_event(__test_function, SIGIO); + fd2 = bp_event(sig_handler, SIGUSR1); + fd3 = wp_event((void *)&the_var, SIGIO); ioctl(fd1, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, 0); ioctl(fd2, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, 0); + ioctl(fd3, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, 0); /* * Kick off the test by trigering 'fd1' @@ -166,15 +253,18 @@ int test__bp_signal(int subtest __maybe_unused) ioctl(fd1, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0); ioctl(fd2, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0); + ioctl(fd3, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0); count1 = bp_count(fd1); count2 = bp_count(fd2); + count3 = bp_count(fd3); close(fd1); close(fd2); + close(fd3); - pr_debug("count1 %lld, count2 %lld, overflow %d\n", - count1, count2, overflows); + pr_debug("count1 %lld, count2 %lld, count3 %lld, overflow %d, overflows_2 %d\n", + count1, count2, count3, overflows, overflows_2); if (count1 != 1) { if (count1 == 11) @@ -183,12 +273,18 @@ int test__bp_signal(int subtest __maybe_unused) pr_debug("failed: wrong count for bp1%lld\n", count1); } - if (overflows != 1) + if (overflows != 3) pr_debug("failed: wrong overflow hit\n"); - if (count2 != 1) + if (overflows_2 != 3) + pr_debug("failed: wrong overflow_2 hit\n"); + + if (count2 != 3) pr_debug("failed: wrong count for bp2\n"); - return count1 == 1 && overflows == 1 && count2 == 1 ? + if (count3 != 2) + pr_debug("failed: wrong count for bp3\n"); + + return count1 == 1 && overflows == 3 && count2 == 3 && overflows_2 == 3 && count3 == 2 ? TEST_OK : TEST_FAIL; }