Message ID | 1456192703-2274-6-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 05:58:23PM -0800, David Daney wrote: > From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> > > Enable NUMA balancing for arm64 platforms. > Add pte, pmd protnone helpers for use by automatic NUMA balancing. > > Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> > Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> > Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index 9f0972a..6e22503 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ config ARM64 > select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST > select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF > select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW > + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING > select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB > select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION > select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h > index bf464de..5af9db2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h > @@ -346,6 +346,21 @@ static inline pgprot_t mk_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot) > return __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING > +/* > + * See the comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h > + */ > +static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte) > +{ > + return (pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_PROT_NONE)) == PTE_PROT_NONE; > +} > + > +static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd) > +{ > + return pte_protnone(pmd_pte(pmd)); > +} > +#endif Can these not be macros, like our other pte_* and pmd_* predicates in this header file? Will
On 02/26/2016 10:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 05:58:23PM -0800, David Daney wrote: >> From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> >> >> Enable NUMA balancing for arm64 platforms. >> Add pte, pmd protnone helpers for use by automatic NUMA balancing. >> >> Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> >> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> >> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + >> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig >> index 9f0972a..6e22503 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ config ARM64 >> select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST >> select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF >> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW >> + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING >> select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB >> select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION >> select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h >> index bf464de..5af9db2 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h >> @@ -346,6 +346,21 @@ static inline pgprot_t mk_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot) >> return __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT); >> } >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING >> +/* >> + * See the comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h >> + */ >> +static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte) >> +{ >> + return (pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_PROT_NONE)) == PTE_PROT_NONE; >> +} >> + >> +static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd) >> +{ >> + return pte_protnone(pmd_pte(pmd)); >> +} >> +#endif > > Can these not be macros, like our other pte_* and pmd_* predicates in > this header file? They probably could be. However there is precedence for the static inline form: $ git grep pte_protnone | grep '\.h' | grep -v return arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte) arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h:static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte) arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h:static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte) arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h:static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte) arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte) include/asm-generic/pgtable.h:static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte) Actually I am a little surprised that all the arm64 pte_* and pmd_* things are not written as static inline to achieve added type safety. The generated code should be identical. > > Will >
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 9f0972a..6e22503 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ config ARM64 select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h index bf464de..5af9db2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -346,6 +346,21 @@ static inline pgprot_t mk_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot) return __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT); } +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING +/* + * See the comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h + */ +static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte) +{ + return (pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_PROT_NONE)) == PTE_PROT_NONE; +} + +static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd) +{ + return pte_protnone(pmd_pte(pmd)); +} +#endif + /* * THP definitions. */