From patchwork Fri Mar 4 06:37:19 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shannon Zhao X-Patchwork-Id: 8499381 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B161AC0553 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE20A201FE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78A70201CD for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1abjSN-000100-5t; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 06:43:23 +0000 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1abjP5-0005Ur-DR for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 06:40:07 +0000 Received: from 172.24.1.50 (EHLO szxeml431-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.1.50]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DCQ14546; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 14:38:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from HGHY1Z002260041.china.huawei.com (10.177.16.142) by szxeml431-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:38:04 +0800 From: Shannon Zhao To: , , , Subject: [PATCH v5 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:37:19 +0800 Message-ID: <1457073455-11516-2-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.0.msysgit.0 In-Reply-To: <1457073455-11516-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> References: <1457073455-11516-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.177.16.142] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0202.56D92D6D.00E6, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: aa6bbe2464fd1c4e903743297252e598 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20160303_224000_289636_CCB8CEF2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.21 ) X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, hangaohuai@huawei.com, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, "open list:ACPI" , shannon.zhao@linaro.org, Len Brown Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Shannon Zhao ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0. Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao --- CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" (supporter:ACPI) CC: Len Brown (supporter:ACPI) CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org (open list:ACPI) --- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index 407a376..31d794c 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(acpi_scan_handlers_list); DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_device_lock); LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_device_list); static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_hp_context_lock); +static u64 spcr_uart_addr; struct acpi_dep_data { struct list_head node; @@ -1453,6 +1454,47 @@ static int acpi_add_single_object(struct acpi_device **child, return 0; } +static acpi_status acpi_get_resource_fixed_memory32(struct acpi_resource *res, + void *context) +{ + struct acpi_resource_fixed_memory32 *fixed_memory32; + + if (res->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32) + return AE_OK; + + fixed_memory32 = &res->data.fixed_memory32; + if (!fixed_memory32) + return AE_OK; + + *((u32 *)context) = fixed_memory32->address; + return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE; +} + +static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_handle handle) +{ + acpi_status status; + u32 addr = 0; + + /* Check if it should ignore the UART device */ + if (spcr_uart_addr != 0) { + if (!acpi_has_method(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS)) + return false; + + status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, + acpi_get_resource_fixed_memory32, + &addr); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + return false; + + if (addr == spcr_uart_addr) { + printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "The UART device in SPCR table will be hidden\n"); + return true; + } + } + + return false; +} + static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type, unsigned long long *sta) { @@ -1466,6 +1508,9 @@ static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type, switch (acpi_type) { case ACPI_TYPE_ANY: /* for ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT */ case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE: + if (acpi_device_should_be_hidden(handle)) + return -ENODEV; + *type = ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE; status = acpi_bus_get_status_handle(handle, sta); if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) @@ -1919,6 +1964,8 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void) int __init acpi_scan_init(void) { int result; + acpi_status status; + struct acpi_table_stao *stao_ptr; acpi_pci_root_init(); acpi_pci_link_init(); @@ -1933,6 +1980,27 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void) acpi_scan_add_handler(&generic_device_handler); + /* If there is STAO table, check whether it needs to ignore the UART + * device in SPCR table. + */ + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_STAO, 0, + (struct acpi_table_header **)&stao_ptr); + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { + if (stao_ptr->header.length > sizeof(struct acpi_table_stao)) + printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "STAO Name List not yet supported."); + + if (stao_ptr->ignore_uart) { + struct acpi_table_spcr *spcr_ptr; + + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_SPCR, 0, + (struct acpi_table_header **)&spcr_ptr); + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) + spcr_uart_addr = spcr_ptr->serial_port.address; + else + printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "STAO table present, but SPCR is missing\n"); + } + } + mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock); /* * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.