| Message ID | 1460742277-2838-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c index f502f2cc65d8..84cce21e98cd 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static int spmi_regulator_select_voltage_same_range(struct spmi_regulator *vreg, if (selector >= vreg->set_points->n_voltages) goto different_range; - return 0; + return selector; different_range: return spmi_regulator_select_voltage(vreg, min_uV, max_uV);
I had a thinko in spmi_regulator_select_voltage_same_range() when converting it to return selectors via the function's return value instead of by modifying a pointer argument. I only tested multi-range regulators so this passed through testing. Fix it by returning the selector here. Fixes: 1b5b19689278 ("regulator: qcom_spmi: Only use selector based regulator ops") Reported-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)