From patchwork Fri Apr 22 11:43:34 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Vladimir Murzin X-Patchwork-Id: 8911341 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0637BF29F for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9112021B for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4597A2020F for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1atZVq-00020G-Tv; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:44:42 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1atZVg-0001s3-Sr for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:44:33 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451434A7; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 04:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from login1.euhpc.arm.com (login1.euhpc.arm.com [10.6.26.143]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3148F3F25F; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 04:44:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Vladimir Murzin To: linux@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: nommu: fix PMSAv7 setup Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 12:43:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1461325416-29570-2-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.0.0 In-Reply-To: <1461325416-29570-1-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> References: <1461325416-29570-1-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20160422_044432_981820_30790E53 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.06 ) X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Jean-Philippe Brucker Commit 1c2f87c (ARM: 8025/1: Get rid of meminfo) broke the support for MPU on ARMv7-R. This patch adapts the code inside CONFIG_ARM_MPU to use memblocks appropriately. MPU initialisation only uses the first memory region, and removes all subsequent ones. Because looping over all regions that need removal is inefficient, and memblock_remove already handles memory ranges, we can flatten the 'for_each_memblock' part. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin --- arch/arm/mm/nommu.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c b/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c index 1dd1093..4d113fc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c @@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ static unsigned long irbar_read(void) /* MPU initialisation functions */ void __init sanity_check_meminfo_mpu(void) { - int i; phys_addr_t phys_offset = PHYS_OFFSET; phys_addr_t aligned_region_size, specified_mem_size, rounded_mem_size; struct memblock_region *reg; @@ -110,11 +109,13 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo_mpu(void) } else { /* * memblock auto merges contiguous blocks, remove - * all blocks afterwards + * all blocks afterwards in one go (we can't remove + * blocks separately while iterating) */ pr_notice("Ignoring RAM after %pa, memory at %pa ignored\n", - &mem_start, ®->base); - memblock_remove(reg->base, reg->size); + &mem_end, ®->base); + memblock_remove(reg->base, 0 - reg->base); + break; } } @@ -144,7 +145,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo_mpu(void) pr_warn("Truncating memory from %pa to %pa (MPU region constraints)", &specified_mem_size, &aligned_region_size); memblock_remove(mem_start + aligned_region_size, - specified_mem_size - aligned_round_size); + specified_mem_size - aligned_region_size); mem_end = mem_start + aligned_region_size; } @@ -261,7 +262,7 @@ void __init mpu_setup(void) return; region_err = mpu_setup_region(MPU_RAM_REGION, PHYS_OFFSET, - ilog2(meminfo.bank[0].size), + ilog2(memblock.memory.regions[0].size), MPU_AP_PL1RW_PL0RW | MPU_RGN_NORMAL); if (region_err) { panic("MPU region initialization failure! %d", region_err);