| Message ID | 1463476352-7485-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:12:32AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > The PWM device exposed by the HLCDC IP is configured with an inverted > polarity by default. Registering the PWM chip with the normal polarity > was not a problem before commit 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core > infrastructure to allow atomic updates") because the ->set_polarity() > hook was called no matter the current polarity state, but this is no longer > the case. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > Fixes: 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core infrastructure to allow atomic updates") That's not technically correct, because it's the driver that has the bug. The core change merely exposes it. How about if I sort this into the pwm-atomic branch and reword the commit message accordingly? That way things should all stay bisectible. Then again, given the breakage caused by the pwm_args patch I suppose it doesn't matter much because that's part of a stable branch that I can't rebase. Thierry
On Tue, 17 May 2016 13:00:05 +0200 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:12:32AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > The PWM device exposed by the HLCDC IP is configured with an inverted > > polarity by default. Registering the PWM chip with the normal polarity > > was not a problem before commit 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core > > infrastructure to allow atomic updates") because the ->set_polarity() > > hook was called no matter the current polarity state, but this is no longer > > the case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > > Fixes: 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core infrastructure to allow atomic updates") > > That's not technically correct, because it's the driver that has the > bug. The core change merely exposes it. Agree. > How about if I sort this into > the pwm-atomic branch and reword the commit message accordingly? That > way things should all stay bisectible. As you wish. > > Then again, given the breakage caused by the pwm_args patch I suppose > it doesn't matter much because that's part of a stable branch that I > can't rebase. Yep, I know :-(.
Hi Thierry, On Tue, 17 May 2016 13:00:05 +0200 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:12:32AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > The PWM device exposed by the HLCDC IP is configured with an inverted > > polarity by default. Registering the PWM chip with the normal polarity > > was not a problem before commit 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core > > infrastructure to allow atomic updates") because the ->set_polarity() > > hook was called no matter the current polarity state, but this is no longer > > the case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > > Fixes: 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core infrastructure to allow atomic updates") > > That's not technically correct, because it's the driver that has the > bug. The core change merely exposes it. How about if I sort this into > the pwm-atomic branch and reword the commit message accordingly? That > way things should all stay bisectible. I don't see this change in your branch. Do you want me to resend this fix after reworking the commit message? Regards, Boris
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 09:58:26AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > On Tue, 17 May 2016 13:00:05 +0200 > Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:12:32AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > The PWM device exposed by the HLCDC IP is configured with an inverted > > > polarity by default. Registering the PWM chip with the normal polarity > > > was not a problem before commit 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core > > > infrastructure to allow atomic updates") because the ->set_polarity() > > > hook was called no matter the current polarity state, but this is no longer > > > the case. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > > > Fixes: 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core infrastructure to allow atomic updates") > > > > That's not technically correct, because it's the driver that has the > > bug. The core change merely exposes it. How about if I sort this into > > the pwm-atomic branch and reword the commit message accordingly? That > > way things should all stay bisectible. > > I don't see this change in your branch. Do you want me to resend this > fix after reworking the commit message? I must have forgotten about it. I've applied it to my fixes branch now, for which I plan on sending a pull request tomorrow. Thierry
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c index f994c7e..14fc011 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) chip->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3; chip->chip.can_sleep = 1; - ret = pwmchip_add(&chip->chip); + ret = pwmchip_add_with_polarity(&chip->chip, PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED); if (ret) { clk_disable_unprepare(hlcdc->periph_clk); return ret;
The PWM device exposed by the HLCDC IP is configured with an inverted polarity by default. Registering the PWM chip with the normal polarity was not a problem before commit 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core infrastructure to allow atomic updates") because the ->set_polarity() hook was called no matter the current polarity state, but this is no longer the case. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Fixes: 42e8992c58d4 ("pwm: Add core infrastructure to allow atomic updates") --- drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)