Message ID | 1470814755-19447-11-git-send-email-patrice.chotard@st.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, patrice.chotard@st.com wrote: > From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> > > The particularities of this variant are: > - GPIO_XXX_LSB and GPIO_XXX_MSB memory locations are inverted compared > to other variants. > - There is no Edge detection, Rising Edge and Falling Edge registers. > - IRQ flags are cleared when read, no need to write in Status register. > > Signed-off-by: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> > Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c > index 6d6d76a..32c5a72 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c > @@ -128,8 +128,9 @@ static int stmpe_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type) > if (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH) > return -EINVAL; > > - /* STMPE801 doesn't have RE and FE registers */ > - if (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE801) > + /* STMPE801 and STMPE 1600 don't have RE and FE registers */ > + if (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE801 || > + stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) > return 0; > > if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) > @@ -173,9 +174,10 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d) > int i, j; > > for (i = 0; i < CACHE_NR_REGS; i++) { > - /* STMPE801 doesn't have RE and FE registers */ > - if ((stmpe->partnum == STMPE801) && > - (i != REG_IE)) > + /* STMPE801 and STMPE1600 don't have RE and FE registers */ > + if ((stmpe->partnum == STMPE801 || > + stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) && > + (i != REG_IE)) > continue; > > for (j = 0; j < num_banks; j++) { > @@ -208,11 +210,21 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d) > { > struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc); > + struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe; > int offset = d->hwirq; > int regoffset = offset / 8; > int mask = 1 << (offset % 8); > > stmpe_gpio->regs[REG_IE][regoffset] |= mask; > + > + /* > + * STMPE1600 workaround: to be able to get IRQ from pins, > + * a read must be done on GPMR register, or a write in > + * GPSR or GPCR registers > + */ > + if (stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) > + stmpe_reg_read(stmpe, > + stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPMR_LSB + regoffset]); > } > > static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s, > @@ -285,6 +297,7 @@ static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s, > fall = !!(ret & mask); > > case STMPE801: > + case STMPE1600: > irqen_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB + bank]; > break; > > @@ -331,18 +344,32 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev) > { > struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = dev; > struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe; > - u8 statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_MSB]; > + u8 statmsbreg; > int num_banks = DIV_ROUND_UP(stmpe->num_gpios, 8); > u8 status[num_banks]; > int ret; > int i; > > + /* > + * the stmpe_block_read() call below, imposes to set statmsbreg > + * with the register located at the lowest address. As STMPE1600 > + * variant is the only one which respect registers address's order > + * (LSB regs located at lowest address than MSB ones) whereas all > + * the others have a registers layout with MSB located before the > + * LSB regs. > + */ > + if (stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) > + statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_LSB]; > + else > + statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_MSB]; > + > ret = stmpe_block_read(stmpe, statmsbreg, num_banks, status); > if (ret < 0) > return IRQ_NONE; > > for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) { > - int bank = num_banks - i - 1; > + int bank = (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) ? i : > + num_banks - i - 1; > unsigned int enabled = stmpe_gpio->regs[REG_IE][bank]; > unsigned int stat = status[i]; > > @@ -362,10 +389,11 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev) > > /* > * interrupt status register write has no effect on > - * 801 and 1801, bits are cleared when read. > - * Edge detect register is not present on 801 and 1801 > + * 801/1801/1600, bits are cleared when read. > + * Edge detect register is not present on 801/1600/1801 > */ > - if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 || stmpe->partnum != STMPE1801) { > + if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 || stmpe->partnum != STMPE1600 || > + stmpe->partnum != STMPE1801) { > stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, statmsbreg + i, status[i]); > stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, > stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_LSB + i],
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c index 6d6d76a..32c5a72 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c @@ -128,8 +128,9 @@ static int stmpe_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type) if (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW || type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH) return -EINVAL; - /* STMPE801 doesn't have RE and FE registers */ - if (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE801) + /* STMPE801 and STMPE 1600 don't have RE and FE registers */ + if (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE801 || + stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) return 0; if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) @@ -173,9 +174,10 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d) int i, j; for (i = 0; i < CACHE_NR_REGS; i++) { - /* STMPE801 doesn't have RE and FE registers */ - if ((stmpe->partnum == STMPE801) && - (i != REG_IE)) + /* STMPE801 and STMPE1600 don't have RE and FE registers */ + if ((stmpe->partnum == STMPE801 || + stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) && + (i != REG_IE)) continue; for (j = 0; j < num_banks; j++) { @@ -208,11 +210,21 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d) { struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc); + struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe; int offset = d->hwirq; int regoffset = offset / 8; int mask = 1 << (offset % 8); stmpe_gpio->regs[REG_IE][regoffset] |= mask; + + /* + * STMPE1600 workaround: to be able to get IRQ from pins, + * a read must be done on GPMR register, or a write in + * GPSR or GPCR registers + */ + if (stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) + stmpe_reg_read(stmpe, + stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPMR_LSB + regoffset]); } static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s, @@ -285,6 +297,7 @@ static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s, fall = !!(ret & mask); case STMPE801: + case STMPE1600: irqen_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB + bank]; break; @@ -331,18 +344,32 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev) { struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = dev; struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe; - u8 statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_MSB]; + u8 statmsbreg; int num_banks = DIV_ROUND_UP(stmpe->num_gpios, 8); u8 status[num_banks]; int ret; int i; + /* + * the stmpe_block_read() call below, imposes to set statmsbreg + * with the register located at the lowest address. As STMPE1600 + * variant is the only one which respect registers address's order + * (LSB regs located at lowest address than MSB ones) whereas all + * the others have a registers layout with MSB located before the + * LSB regs. + */ + if (stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) + statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_LSB]; + else + statmsbreg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_ISGPIOR_MSB]; + ret = stmpe_block_read(stmpe, statmsbreg, num_banks, status); if (ret < 0) return IRQ_NONE; for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) { - int bank = num_banks - i - 1; + int bank = (stmpe_gpio->stmpe->partnum == STMPE1600) ? i : + num_banks - i - 1; unsigned int enabled = stmpe_gpio->regs[REG_IE][bank]; unsigned int stat = status[i]; @@ -362,10 +389,11 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev) /* * interrupt status register write has no effect on - * 801 and 1801, bits are cleared when read. - * Edge detect register is not present on 801 and 1801 + * 801/1801/1600, bits are cleared when read. + * Edge detect register is not present on 801/1600/1801 */ - if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 || stmpe->partnum != STMPE1801) { + if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 || stmpe->partnum != STMPE1600 || + stmpe->partnum != STMPE1801) { stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, statmsbreg + i, status[i]); stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_LSB + i],