From patchwork Thu Apr 5 16:59:06 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Will Deacon X-Patchwork-Id: 10325061 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDED6032A for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 17:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFA2292F7 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 17:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 233A629305; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 17:06:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ADB9292F7 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 17:06:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=lNH2we24fpbDnaDpfO2ec8IHL3GLnpoMW1fyLUdWGh8=; b=hHySWqZekroSPun8XKNhdMz1Sm 2cfPazm3y6T6l8ZSTQstiF69NwsYFlG9imd55khTC5Gg/Pp6w4W6yAWZyoblL3G9q8jbXsQvSmEl6 S1SAixFT4rTR0/dCEA6tWDZDVrMsG9xeSXrkMRPX1z8LoQQ6NiDt7u5mTvSl0RSakz37rELdKhi/t c4l6N6eSuMw7uuh/qmqRZK6VxcAf9nrifp4jiJ+DNE2V6Il/upcyzwcCS/GgZwScUcjMcoxjvVDJd 00PCMdZI3zxFQBIUxTu3BgLuMUjuodNQ+Ojzrgk8OWw5JiOhSCykkpD+JFYpWcCu3h+TS3YI041r0 XZiW2Pug==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1f48Kh-0001RT-Md; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 17:05:55 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70] helo=foss.arm.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1f48EI-0003ZO-UP for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 16:59:23 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D9316A3; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 09:58:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from edgewater-inn.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ECCEC3F7DB; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 09:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by edgewater-inn.cambridge.arm.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1F8AC1AE55AA; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 17:59:09 +0100 (BST) From: Will Deacon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 09/10] locking/qspinlock: Make queued_spin_unlock use smp_store_release Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 17:59:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1522947547-24081-10-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1522947547-24081-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> References: <1522947547-24081-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20180405_095919_075415_4E3EC1CF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.25 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, Will Deacon , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP A qspinlock can be unlocked simply by writing zero to the locked byte. This can be implemented in the generic code, so do that and remove the arch-specific override for x86 in the !PV case. Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 17 ++++++----------- include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h index 90b0b0ed8161..cc77cbb01432 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h @@ -7,6 +7,12 @@ #include #include +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS +extern void native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val); +extern void __pv_init_lock_hash(void); +extern void __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val); +extern void __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock); + #define queued_spin_unlock queued_spin_unlock /** * queued_spin_unlock - release a queued spinlock @@ -19,12 +25,6 @@ static inline void native_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock) smp_store_release(&lock->locked, 0); } -#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS -extern void native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val); -extern void __pv_init_lock_hash(void); -extern void __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val); -extern void __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock); - static inline void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) { pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock, val); @@ -40,11 +40,6 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu) { return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu); } -#else -static inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock) -{ - native_queued_spin_unlock(lock); -} #endif #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h index b37b4ad7eb94..a8ed0a352d75 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock) /* * unlock() needs release semantics: */ - (void)atomic_sub_return_release(_Q_LOCKED_VAL, &lock->val); + smp_store_release(&lock->locked, 0); } #endif