From patchwork Tue Dec 11 23:28:46 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dave Martin X-Patchwork-Id: 10725241 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC036C5 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3D12B719 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id D08732B72F; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:32:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495C82B719 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:32:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=uwFaVZ1Ci074SAaVuwtvO/SMvgWzwA9QXSgQaEDgyw8=; b=NxxNTGCx/8UdCd WMAAz2sawi8QGq69ri9m8YmxOT9YtAcQGDR5W/UZJ7yfe/x6mZ/M9c5rCDA5+DFwEjUPefpROOraa lcBIjxZSz4zDfw2XnoFqLeDvMxKi616aHO9bRhRGz063RScgZfJiNVT19lBp0SnrT0g/sHrFuZpT5 uIzTVQohXkoj7TXsg18Pjp6fpvKuatpUqw32Lu6syL6I7djveW7oqTTSYZSNHMa2VQmXRQO1QTg2k Wa7c/q83Qe0F10xQTOLFBskBudNgYLw0Oald9bIFKDJb0bvbBD+lvpJEWZP7RcKf/6nSzUUqx+2+2 S0Fcdqv028nsbcIIidAQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gWrWD-0007Sf-JW; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:32:49 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70] helo=foss.arm.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gWrTh-0004QH-TR for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:30:28 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D1980D; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from e103592.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DF3B73F614; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:30:05 -0800 (PST) From: Dave Martin To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 09/24] KVM: arm64: Propagate vcpu into read_id_reg() Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:28:46 +0000 Message-Id: <1544570941-7377-10-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1544570941-7377-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> References: <1544570941-7377-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20181211_153014_616879_733CD300 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.23 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Okamoto Takayuki , Christoffer Dall , Ard Biesheuvel , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Architecture features that are conditionally visible to the guest will require run-time checks in the ID register accessor functions. In particular, read_id_reg() will need to perform checks in order to generate the correct emulated value for certain ID register fields such as ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE for example. This patch propagates vcpu into read_id_reg() so that future patches can add run-time checks on the guest configuration here. For now, there is no functional change. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée --- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index 22fbbdb..0dfd064 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -1029,7 +1029,8 @@ static bool access_cntp_cval(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, } /* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */ -static u64 read_id_reg(struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz) +static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz) { u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1, (u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2); @@ -1060,7 +1061,7 @@ static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, if (p->is_write) return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r); - p->regval = read_id_reg(r, raz); + p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz); return true; } @@ -1089,16 +1090,18 @@ static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg); * are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value * to be changed. */ -static int __get_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, +static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, bool raz) { const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd); - const u64 val = read_id_reg(rd, raz); + const u64 val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz); return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id); } -static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, +static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, bool raz) { const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd); @@ -1110,7 +1113,7 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, return err; /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */ - if (val != read_id_reg(rd, raz)) + if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz)) return -EINVAL; return 0; @@ -1119,25 +1122,25 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr) { - return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false); + return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false); } static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr) { - return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false); + return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false); } static int get_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr) { - return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true); + return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true); } static int set_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr) { - return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true); + return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true); } /* sys_reg_desc initialiser for known cpufeature ID registers */