Message ID | 1550519559-15915-6-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: arm64: SVE guest support | expand |
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 07:52:18PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > kvm_host.h uses DECLARE_BITMAP() to declare the features member of > struct vcpu_arch, but the corresponding #include for this is > missing. > > This patch adds a suitable #include for <linux/bitmap.h>. Although > the header builds without it today, this should help to avoid > future surprises. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 7732d0b..84056a4 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > #ifndef __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ > #define __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ > > +#include <linux/bitmap.h> > #include <linux/types.h> > #include <linux/kvm_types.h> > #include <asm/cpufeature.h> From a quick scan of the file, we're also missing: #include <linux/jump_label.h> #include <linux/percpu.h> #include <linux/thread_info.h> #include <asm/barrier.h> ... which might be worth adding at the same time. Thanks, Mark.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:23:50PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 07:52:18PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > kvm_host.h uses DECLARE_BITMAP() to declare the features member of > > struct vcpu_arch, but the corresponding #include for this is > > missing. > > > > This patch adds a suitable #include for <linux/bitmap.h>. Although > > the header builds without it today, this should help to avoid > > future surprises. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> > > Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > index 7732d0b..84056a4 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > > #ifndef __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ > > #define __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ > > > > +#include <linux/bitmap.h> > > #include <linux/types.h> > > #include <linux/kvm_types.h> > > #include <asm/cpufeature.h> > > From a quick scan of the file, we're also missing: > > #include <asm/barrier.h> [...] > #include <linux/jump_label.h> > #include <linux/percpu.h> Done for those three. > #include <linux/thread_info.h> Since commit e6b673b741ea ("KVM: arm64: Optimise FPSIMD handling to reduce guest/host thrashing", we do have <asm/thread_info.h>. Since this header is not generic, this seems reasonable. Is there something from <linux/thread_info.h> used here that I'm missing? Cheers ---Dave
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:06:16PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:23:50PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 07:52:18PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > > kvm_host.h uses DECLARE_BITMAP() to declare the features member of > > > struct vcpu_arch, but the corresponding #include for this is > > > missing. > > > > > > This patch adds a suitable #include for <linux/bitmap.h>. Although > > > the header builds without it today, this should help to avoid > > > future surprises. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > > index 7732d0b..84056a4 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > > > #ifndef __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ > > > #define __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ > > > > > > +#include <linux/bitmap.h> > > > #include <linux/types.h> > > > #include <linux/kvm_types.h> > > > #include <asm/cpufeature.h> > > > > From a quick scan of the file, we're also missing: > > > > #include <asm/barrier.h> > > [...] > > > #include <linux/jump_label.h> > > #include <linux/percpu.h> > > Done for those three. Great. > > #include <linux/thread_info.h> > > Since commit e6b673b741ea ("KVM: arm64: Optimise FPSIMD handling to > reduce guest/host thrashing", we do have <asm/thread_info.h>. > > Since this header is not generic, this seems reasonable. Is there > something from <linux/thread_info.h> used here that I'm missing? I think I just confused myself; <asm/thread_info.h> seems sufficient. Thanks, Mark.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:31:45PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:06:16PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:23:50PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: [...] > > > #include <asm/barrier.h> > > > > [...] > > > > > #include <linux/jump_label.h> > > > #include <linux/percpu.h> > > > > Done for those three. > > Great. > > > > #include <linux/thread_info.h> > > > > Since commit e6b673b741ea ("KVM: arm64: Optimise FPSIMD handling to > > reduce guest/host thrashing", we do have <asm/thread_info.h>. > > > > Since this header is not generic, this seems reasonable. Is there > > something from <linux/thread_info.h> used here that I'm missing? > > I think I just confused myself; <asm/thread_info.h> seems sufficient. OK, I shan't worry about that one, then. Cheers ---Dave
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:33:22PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:31:45PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:06:16PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:23:50PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > [...] > > > > > #include <asm/barrier.h> > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > #include <linux/jump_label.h> > > > > #include <linux/percpu.h> > > > > > > Done for those three. > > > > Great. > > > > > > #include <linux/thread_info.h> > > > > > > Since commit e6b673b741ea ("KVM: arm64: Optimise FPSIMD handling to > > > reduce guest/host thrashing", we do have <asm/thread_info.h>. > > > > > > Since this header is not generic, this seems reasonable. Is there > > > something from <linux/thread_info.h> used here that I'm missing? > > > > I think I just confused myself; <asm/thread_info.h> seems sufficient. > > OK, I shan't worry about that one, then. Cool. FWIW, feel free to add: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> ... to that fixed-up commmit. Thanks, Mark.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 7732d0b..84056a4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #ifndef __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ #define __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ +#include <linux/bitmap.h> #include <linux/types.h> #include <linux/kvm_types.h> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>