diff mbox series

[v4,1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings

Message ID 1551260094-32570-2-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander | expand

Commit Message

Amelie Delaunay Feb. 27, 2019, 9:34 a.m. UTC
This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt

Comments

Rob Herring Feb. 27, 2019, 11:55 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> 

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Amelie Delaunay Feb. 28, 2019, 8:53 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 

I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is 
identical to v3.

I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side 
effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change 
between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.

Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
Rob Herring Feb. 28, 2019, 2:41 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> >> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> >> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> >>
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> >
>
> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
> identical to v3.
>
> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>
> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?

No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.

Rob
Amelie Delaunay Feb. 28, 2019, 2:59 p.m. UTC | #4
On 2/28/19 3:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>>>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>>>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
>>> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
>>> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>>>
>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
>> identical to v3.
>>
>> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
>> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
>> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>>
>> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
> 
> No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
> Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.
> 
> Rob
> 

Noted. I will ensure not to forget any tag next time.

Regards,
Amelie
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0c2f7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ 
+STMicroelectonics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) Core bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller using I2C for
+communication with the main MCU. Its main features are GPIO expansion, main
+MCU IDD measurement (IDD is the amount of current that flows through VDD) and
+resistive touchscreen controller.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300".
+- reg: I2C slave address of the device.
+- interrupts: interrupt specifier triggered by MFX_IRQ_OUT signal.
+  Please refer to ../interrupt-controller/interrupt.txt
+
+Optional properties:
+- drive-open-drain: configure MFX_IRQ_OUT as open drain.
+- vdd-supply: phandle of the regulator supplying STMFX.
+
+Example:
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+		reg = <0x42>;
+		interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+		vdd-supply = <&v3v3>;
+	};
+
+Please refer to ../pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt for STMFX GPIO expander function bindings.