Message ID | 1551785646-46173-14-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,01/15] ARM: actions: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put | expand |
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 07:34:05PM +0800, Wen Yang wrote: > The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount > incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last > usage. > > Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: > ./arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c:102:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 69, but without a corresponding object release within this function. > > Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> > Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- > v2->v1: add a missing space between "adding" and "missing" > > arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c > index ea00124..00f8b86 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static const char *__init cpu_read_enable_method(int cpu) > pr_err("%pOF: missing enable-method property\n", > dn); > } > + of_node_put(dn); > } else { > enable_method = acpi_get_enable_method(cpu); > if (!enable_method) { Looks about right to me: Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> How do you plan to get this upstream? Can we just pick this one up via arm64? Will
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 01:56:09PM +0800, wen.yang99@zte.com.cn wrote: > > > The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount > > > incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last > > > usage. > > > > > > Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: > > > ./arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c:102:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 69, but without a corresponding object release within this function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> > > > Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> > > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > --- > > > v2->v1: add a missing space between "adding" and "missing" > > > > > > arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c > > > index ea00124..00f8b86 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c > > > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static const char *__init cpu_read_enable_method(int cpu) > > > pr_err("%pOF: missing enable-method property\n", > > > dn); > > > } > > > + of_node_put(dn); > > > } else { > > > enable_method = acpi_get_enable_method(cpu); > > > if (!enable_method) { > > > > Looks about right to me: > > > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > > > > How do you plan to get this upstream? Can we just pick this one up via > > arm64? > > Ok, thank you. > We are very happy to know that it is useful. Ok, I picked it up. Will
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c index ea00124..00f8b86 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static const char *__init cpu_read_enable_method(int cpu) pr_err("%pOF: missing enable-method property\n", dn); } + of_node_put(dn); } else { enable_method = acpi_get_enable_method(cpu); if (!enable_method) {