From patchwork Fri Jan 17 11:36:46 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Claudiu Beznea X-Patchwork-Id: 11338835 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F79392A for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DB2E2072B for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="R98Tt0Hm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1DB2E2072B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=cVebni1+AJw908k+ASM8QGpMtEHlkqvsdPdL2BAKGyY=; b=R98Tt0HmYeylFZ 4reAiqZeLoouf80olRZsVR5te8rOwRqVMH8xiSq2fLPDbNms6R0Vksx/Lgfxu+QKhDTwPxH5agPVE uta13yUiHpDq8IP8ZAMoPZr+tqZCMrm8mRazyAfRFkGKOoHnIPKPo0C/QEfEN/u9ga56lu0DeL7uv suv1kf5Iehk9c/sQHLy39IgjDHuYZneWwNbXrsxvfQARD7dBIqAO6o4jGJloC1GyozZVp/E7zxv7u EE8JWwFR3NfbJdVaiHhmhDxHzkh+xhg5ttUBEberP7GN6veDx9Z5fsf2GqSr0sEYYUydv9NrlGfY9 ACzfjvxxK0cSZKN5BhEQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1isPwd-0003It-GE; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:37:43 +0000 Received: from esa1.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.147.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1isPw4-0002qi-Pt for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:37:15 +0000 Received-SPF: Pass (esa1.microchip.iphmx.com: domain of Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com designates 198.175.253.82 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=198.175.253.82; receiver=esa1.microchip.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com"; x-sender="Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 mx a:ushub1.microchip.com a:smtpout.microchip.com -exists:%{i}.spf.microchip.iphmx.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:mktomail.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa1.microchip.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@email.microchip.com) identity=helo; client-ip=198.175.253.82; receiver=esa1.microchip.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com"; x-sender="postmaster@email.microchip.com"; x-conformance=spf_only Authentication-Results: esa1.microchip.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@email.microchip.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) d=microchip.com IronPort-SDR: wnsX0hfwYhhdlhGhTJBU7BWF0EkFH6x5NEyAV62Ni5qEY+ihjQ9hOhN+/t/wt26cLsftcKpX2U e3NaBYAL1oc2jCuOHoa5Xh5iYQ2qhTBqWj3PQ1IEhv4erJKLeiPpMw/7pfTMYghWtfFKvX8ZZ9 BJYwmvqqfGih+4ca4FBGSiXjd0w2MnLqN2IEceiB94f+txhZUhaZMeijWMtmvosTQTW3R9LPVa Ha+2/PHxrnxq24jNU7eQk0BBnalvmXzUroEexyg04gKd/fO6JDmTMEGUn20Wef8KBlNEO3ov6j nAI= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,330,1574146800"; d="scan'208";a="65083780" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa1.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 17 Jan 2020 04:37:05 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 04:37:04 -0700 Received: from m18063-ThinkPad-T460p.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.251) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 04:37:02 -0700 From: Claudiu Beznea To: , , , , Subject: [PATCH 1/4] clk: at91: usb: continue if clk_hw_round_rate() return zero Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:36:46 +0200 Message-ID: <1579261009-4573-2-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1579261009-4573-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> References: <1579261009-4573-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200117_033708_849323_68762952 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.22 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [68.232.147.91 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Claudiu Beznea , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org clk_hw_round_rate() may call round rate function of its parents. In case of SAM9X60 two of USB parrents are PLLA and UPLL. These clocks are controlled by clk-sam9x60-pll.c driver. The round rate function for this driver is sam9x60_pll_round_rate() which call in turn sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(). In case the requested rate is not in the proper range (rate < characteristics->output[0].min && rate > characteristics->output[0].max) the sam9x60_pll_round_rate() will return a negative number to its caller (called by clk_core_round_rate_nolock()). clk_hw_round_rate() will return zero in case a negative number is returned by clk_core_round_rate_nolock(). With this, the USB clock will continue its rate computation even caller of clk_hw_round_rate() returned an error. With this, the USB clock on SAM9X60 may not chose the best parent. I detected this after a suspend/resume cycle on SAM9X60. Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea --- drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c index 22aede42a336..3c0bd7e51b09 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c @@ -75,6 +75,9 @@ static int at91sam9x5_clk_usb_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, tmp_parent_rate = req->rate * div; tmp_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(parent, tmp_parent_rate); + if (!tmp_parent_rate) + continue; + tmp_rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(tmp_parent_rate, div); if (tmp_rate < req->rate) tmp_diff = req->rate - tmp_rate;