Message ID | 1584642115-15378-1-git-send-email-alain.volmat@st.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Mainlined |
Commit | 79d48da381ca977c60e17bdebd2e6f7c4c390df8 |
Headers | show |
Series | i2c: i2c-stm32f7: improve nack debug message | expand |
Hello guys ! Reviewed-by: Pierre-Yves MORDRET <pierre-yves.mordret@st.com> Thanks On 3/19/20 7:21 PM, Alain Volmat wrote: > From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> > > Add information on slave addr in the nack debug message. > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> > Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@st.com> > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c > index 378956ac6d1d..78d40a4cc282 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c > @@ -1431,7 +1431,8 @@ static irqreturn_t stm32f7_i2c_isr_event(int irq, void *data) > > /* NACK received */ > if (status & STM32F7_I2C_ISR_NACKF) { > - dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "<%s>: Receive NACK\n", __func__); > + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "<%s>: Receive NACK (addr %x)\n", > + __func__, f7_msg->addr); > writel_relaxed(STM32F7_I2C_ICR_NACKCF, base + STM32F7_I2C_ICR); > f7_msg->result = -ENXIO; > } >
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 07:21:55PM +0100, Alain Volmat wrote: > From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> > > Add information on slave addr in the nack debug message. > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> > Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@st.com> Applied to for-next, thanks! (I'd drop the __func__, though; doesn't add information, does it?)
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 07:21:55PM +0100, Alain Volmat wrote: > > From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> > > > > Add information on slave addr in the nack debug message. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> > > Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@st.com> > > Applied to for-next, thanks! (I'd drop the __func__, though; doesn't > add information, does it?) In fact similar message is displayed in 2 places. One in case of master mode isr and the other one in case of slave isr. This message is adding slave address to the master mode isr. It only makes it more clear on first sight but indeed displaying the slave address obviously means this is master mode.
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c index 378956ac6d1d..78d40a4cc282 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c @@ -1431,7 +1431,8 @@ static irqreturn_t stm32f7_i2c_isr_event(int irq, void *data) /* NACK received */ if (status & STM32F7_I2C_ISR_NACKF) { - dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "<%s>: Receive NACK\n", __func__); + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "<%s>: Receive NACK (addr %x)\n", + __func__, f7_msg->addr); writel_relaxed(STM32F7_I2C_ICR_NACKCF, base + STM32F7_I2C_ICR); f7_msg->result = -ENXIO; }