Message ID | 1645003971-16908-5-git-send-email-xinlei.lee@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml format | expand |
On 16/02/2022 10:32, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > > Add dt-binding documentation of pwm for MediaTek MT8186 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 05:32:51PM +0800, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > > Add dt-binding documentation of pwm for MediaTek MT8186 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml > index 768ab04d3764..1f45b1b8c3d4 100755 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties: > - mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm > - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm > - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm > + - mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm > - mediatek,mt8192-disp-pwm > - mediatek,mt8195-disp-pwm It seems unlikely that every SoC has a different version of h/w for something as simple as a PWM. There's not an appropriate fallback? The first version from an SoC that has all the features and would work with existing driver unchanged? Rob
On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 15:19 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 05:32:51PM +0800, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com > wrote: > > From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > > > > Add dt-binding documentation of pwm for MediaTek MT8186 SoC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee < > > xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm- > > disp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm- > > disp.yaml > > index 768ab04d3764..1f45b1b8c3d4 100755 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties: > > - mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm > > - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm > > - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm > > + - mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm > > - mediatek,mt8192-disp-pwm > > - mediatek,mt8195-disp-pwm > > It seems unlikely that every SoC has a different version of h/w for > something as simple as a PWM. There's not an appropriate fallback? > The > first version from an SoC that has all the features and would work > with > existing driver unchanged? > > Rob Hi Rob: Thanks for your suggestion,I agree with your point of view. If I want to show that different socs are using this disp_pwm, can I use oneOf with items to achieve this, and reuse the compatiable that is currently included in the pwm_mtk_disp.c file. E.g: - items: - enum: -mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm - enum: -mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm What's your suggestion for this program? Best Regards! xinlei
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 2:18 PM xinlei.lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 15:19 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 05:32:51PM +0800, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com > > wrote: > > > From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > > > > > > Add dt-binding documentation of pwm for MediaTek MT8186 SoC. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee < > > > xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm- > > > disp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm- > > > disp.yaml > > > index 768ab04d3764..1f45b1b8c3d4 100755 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml > > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties: > > > - mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm > > > - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm > > > - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm > > > + - mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm > > > - mediatek,mt8192-disp-pwm > > > - mediatek,mt8195-disp-pwm > > > > It seems unlikely that every SoC has a different version of h/w for > > something as simple as a PWM. There's not an appropriate fallback? > > The > > first version from an SoC that has all the features and would work > > with > > existing driver unchanged? > > > > Rob > > Hi Rob: > > Thanks for your suggestion,I agree with your point of view. > If I want to show that different socs are using this disp_pwm, can I > use oneOf with items to achieve this, and reuse the compatiable that is > currently included in the pwm_mtk_disp.c file. > E.g: > - items: > - enum: > -mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm > - enum: > -mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm > What's your suggestion for this program? Using Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml as a reference, you would have: compatible: oneOf: - enum: - mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm - items: - const: mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm - const: mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm ... ChenYu > Best Regards! > xinlei > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
On Fri, 2022-02-25 at 14:26 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 2:18 PM xinlei.lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com> > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 15:19 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 05:32:51PM +0800, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com > > > wrote: > > > > From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > > > > > > > > Add dt-binding documentation of pwm for MediaTek MT8186 SoC. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee < > > > > xinlei.lee@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | > > > > 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm- > > > > disp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm- > > > > disp.yaml > > > > index 768ab04d3764..1f45b1b8c3d4 100755 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm- > > > > disp.yaml > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm- > > > > disp.yaml > > > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties: > > > > - mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm > > > > - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm > > > > - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm > > > > + - mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm > > > > - mediatek,mt8192-disp-pwm > > > > - mediatek,mt8195-disp-pwm > > > > > > It seems unlikely that every SoC has a different version of h/w > > > for > > > something as simple as a PWM. There's not an appropriate > > > fallback? > > > The > > > first version from an SoC that has all the features and would > > > work > > > with > > > existing driver unchanged? > > > > > > Rob > > > > Hi Rob: > > > > Thanks for your suggestion,I agree with your point of view. > > If I want to show that different socs are using this disp_pwm, can > > I > > use oneOf with items to achieve this, and reuse the compatiable > > that is > > currently included in the pwm_mtk_disp.c file. > > E.g: > > - items: > > - enum: > > -mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm > > - enum: > > -mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm > > What's your suggestion for this program? > > Using Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml as a > reference, > you would have: > compatible: > oneOf: > - enum: > - mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm > - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm > - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm > - items: > - const: mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm > - const: mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm > ... > > ChenYu > > > > Best Regards! > > xinlei > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-mediatek mailing list > > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek Hi chenyu: Thanks for your suggestion! I will refer to this file to reuse the already defined disp_pwm. Best Regards! xinlei
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml index 768ab04d3764..1f45b1b8c3d4 100755 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties: - mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm + - mediatek,mt8186-disp-pwm - mediatek,mt8192-disp-pwm - mediatek,mt8195-disp-pwm