Message ID | 20120704105653.GA20021@elf.ucw.cz (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hello, Le Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:56:53 +0200, Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> a écrit : > Hmm, strange. I see picoxcell-pc3x2.dtsi using similar > dw-apb-uart. According to 8250_dw.c, it is not completely > 16550-compatible, and uses slightly modified driver. > > So it can be driven from dts, but not as ns16850 compatible. This > patch does so. I guess your patch misses the .dts bits, but other than that, looks much better without this bizarre notifier thing. Do you plan to resend a complete v2 with all your patches nicely rebased? It's not that easy to review such a set of small cleanup increments :-) Regards, Thomas
On Wed 2012-07-04 13:10:24, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > Le Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:56:53 +0200, > Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> a écrit : > > > Hmm, strange. I see picoxcell-pc3x2.dtsi using similar > > dw-apb-uart. According to 8250_dw.c, it is not completely > > 16550-compatible, and uses slightly modified driver. > > > > So it can be driven from dts, but not as ns16850 compatible. This > > patch does so. > > I guess your patch misses the .dts bits, but other than that, looks > much better without this bizarre notifier thing. It turned out that dts already does the right thing. > Do you plan to resend a complete v2 with all your patches nicely > rebased? It's not that easy to review such a set of small cleanup > increments :-) Sorry about that. Obviously, complete v2 will follow when major problems are fixed. (We do use git tree for coordination; I guess we should make it public at this point?) Thanks, Pavel
Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@denx.de] > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 6:24 AM > To: Thomas Petazzoni > Cc: Dinh Nguyen; linux@arm.linux.org.uk; Kenneth Chong Yin Tan; > wd@denx.de; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv1 1/2] ARM: socfpga: initial support for > Altera's SOCFPGA platform. > > On Wed 2012-07-04 13:10:24, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Le Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:56:53 +0200, > > Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> a écrit : > > > > > Hmm, strange. I see picoxcell-pc3x2.dtsi using similar > > > dw-apb-uart. According to 8250_dw.c, it is not completely > > > 16550-compatible, and uses slightly modified driver. > > > > > > So it can be driven from dts, but not as ns16850 compatible. This > > > patch does so. > > > > I guess your patch misses the .dts bits, but other than that, looks > > much better without this bizarre notifier thing. > > It turned out that dts already does the right thing. > > > Do you plan to resend a complete v2 with all your patches nicely > > rebased? It's not that easy to review such a set of small cleanup > > increments :-) > > Sorry about that. Obviously, complete v2 will follow when major > problems are fixed. (We do use git tree for coordination; I guess we > should make it public at this point?) I'm reworking the patch to use the exisiting clocksource/dw_apb_timer driver. I'm hoping to have v2 ready for submission by early next week. Dinh > > Thanks, > Pavel > -- > (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek > (cesky, pictures) > http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html Confidentiality Notice. This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/common.c index 0df10ef..ae310a5 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/common.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/common.c @@ -45,20 +45,9 @@ extern struct dw_mci_board sdmmc_platform_data; extern struct dma_pl330_platdata dma_platform_data; -#define DW_APB_UART_OF_COMPATIBLE "snps,dw-apb-uart" - #define SOCFPGA_MPU_PERIHCLK_FREQ_HZ (800000000 / 4) #define SOCFPGA_L4_MAIN_CLK (400000000) - -struct plat_serial8250_port uart_platform_data[] = { - { - .type = PORT_16850, - .flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF | UPF_IOREMAP | \ - UPF_FIXED_TYPE, - }, -}; - void __init socfpga_init_clocks(void) { struct clk *dummy_apb_pclk; @@ -126,12 +115,3 @@ void __init socfpga_timer_init(void __iomem *src_timer_base, dwapbt_clocksource_init(src_timer_base); dwapbt_clockevents_init(event_timer_base, event_timer_irq); } - -int socfpga_notifier(struct device *device) -{ - struct device_node *dn = device->of_node; - - if (of_device_is_compatible(dn, DW_APB_UART_OF_COMPATIBLE)) - device->platform_data = &uart_platform_data; - return 0; -} diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga_cyclone5.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga_cyclone5.c index d8cd89b..d67fc92 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga_cyclone5.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga_cyclone5.c @@ -138,7 +138,6 @@ static void __init socfpga_cyclone5_init(void) /* 8-way, 64K/way, evmon/parity/share */ l2x0_of_init(0x00760000, 0xfe000fff); #endif - platform_notify = socfpga_notifier; of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, cyclone5_auxdata_lookup, NULL); }