From patchwork Tue Jan 22 07:33:32 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" X-Patchwork-Id: 2015771 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939B43FCDE for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TxYOX-0001Am-Sw; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:35:45 +0000 Received: from e28smtp09.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.9]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TxYOG-00016X-VC for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:35:32 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp09.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:04:12 +0530 Received: from d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (9.184.220.127) by e28smtp09.in.ibm.com (192.168.1.139) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:04:10 +0530 Received: from d28relay01.in.ibm.com (d28relay01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.58]) by d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5B53940053 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:05:21 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay01.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r0M7ZIDd43712570 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:05:18 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r0M7ZH5F024169 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:35:20 +1100 Received: from srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com (srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com [9.124.35.112]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id r0M7ZH4M024098; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:35:17 +1100 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v5 02/45] percpu_rwlock: Introduce per-CPU variables for the reader and the writer To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, namhyung@kernel.org Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:03:32 +0530 Message-ID: <20130122073327.13822.96745.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20130122073210.13822.50434.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20130122073210.13822.50434.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> User-Agent: StGIT/0.14.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13012207-2674-0000-0000-0000078F5F09 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20130122_023529_791172_F825C294 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.20 ) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-1.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [122.248.162.9 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.0 KHOP_BIG_TO_CC Sent to 10+ recipients instaed of Bcc or a list -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl, sbw@mit.edu, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Per-CPU rwlocks ought to give better performance than global rwlocks. That is where the "per-CPU" component comes in. So introduce the necessary per-CPU variables that would be necessary at the reader and the writer sides, and add the support for dynamically initializing per-CPU rwlocks. These per-CPU variables will be used subsequently to implement the core algorithm behind per-CPU rwlocks. Cc: David Howells Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h | 4 ++++ lib/percpu-rwlock.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h b/include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h index 45620d0..cd5eab5 100644 --- a/include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h +++ b/include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ #include struct percpu_rwlock { + unsigned long __percpu *reader_refcnt; + bool __percpu *writer_signal; rwlock_t global_rwlock; }; @@ -41,6 +43,8 @@ extern void percpu_write_unlock(struct percpu_rwlock *); extern int __percpu_init_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *, const char *, struct lock_class_key *); +extern void percpu_free_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *); + #define percpu_init_rwlock(pcpu_rwlock) \ ({ static struct lock_class_key rwlock_key; \ __percpu_init_rwlock(pcpu_rwlock, #pcpu_rwlock, &rwlock_key); \ diff --git a/lib/percpu-rwlock.c b/lib/percpu-rwlock.c index af0c714..80dad93 100644 --- a/lib/percpu-rwlock.c +++ b/lib/percpu-rwlock.c @@ -31,6 +31,17 @@ int __percpu_init_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *rwlock_key) { + pcpu_rwlock->reader_refcnt = alloc_percpu(unsigned long); + if (unlikely(!pcpu_rwlock->reader_refcnt)) + return -ENOMEM; + + pcpu_rwlock->writer_signal = alloc_percpu(bool); + if (unlikely(!pcpu_rwlock->writer_signal)) { + free_percpu(pcpu_rwlock->reader_refcnt); + pcpu_rwlock->reader_refcnt = NULL; + return -ENOMEM; + } + /* ->global_rwlock represents the whole percpu_rwlock for lockdep */ #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK __rwlock_init(&pcpu_rwlock->global_rwlock, name, rwlock_key); @@ -41,6 +52,16 @@ int __percpu_init_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock, return 0; } +void percpu_free_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock) +{ + free_percpu(pcpu_rwlock->reader_refcnt); + free_percpu(pcpu_rwlock->writer_signal); + + /* Catch use-after-free bugs */ + pcpu_rwlock->reader_refcnt = NULL; + pcpu_rwlock->writer_signal = NULL; +} + void percpu_read_lock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock) { read_lock(&pcpu_rwlock->global_rwlock);