From patchwork Mon Feb 18 12:38:45 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" X-Patchwork-Id: 2157591 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork2.kernel.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by patchwork2.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4534FDF25A for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1U7Q29-0002VF-Fs; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:41:25 +0000 Received: from e28smtp07.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.7]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1U7Q1b-0002I6-09 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:40:57 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp07.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:08:03 +0530 Received: from d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (9.184.220.127) by e28smtp07.in.ibm.com (192.168.1.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:08:01 +0530 Received: from d28relay04.in.ibm.com (d28relay04.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.61]) by d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBCB394004F for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:10:45 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (d28av02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.64]) by d28relay04.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r1ICeg0R23461918 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:10:42 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r1ICefIB014308 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:40:44 +1100 Received: from srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com (srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com [9.124.35.204] (may be forged)) by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id r1ICefMa014277; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:40:41 +1100 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v6 02/46] percpu_rwlock: Introduce per-CPU variables for the reader and the writer To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, namhyung@kernel.org Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:08:45 +0530 Message-ID: <20130218123845.26245.58287.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> User-Agent: StGIT/0.14.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13021812-8878-0000-0000-000005EFB8FF X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20130218_074052_005239_728221D7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.03 ) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-1.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [122.248.162.7 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.0 KHOP_BIG_TO_CC Sent to 10+ recipients instaed of Bcc or a list -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl, sbw@mit.edu, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, walken@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Per-CPU rwlocks ought to give better performance than global rwlocks. That is where the "per-CPU" component comes in. So introduce the necessary per-CPU variables that would be necessary at the reader and the writer sides, and add the support for dynamically initializing per-CPU rwlocks. These per-CPU variables will be used subsequently to implement the core algorithm behind per-CPU rwlocks. Cc: David Howells Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h | 8 ++++++++ lib/percpu-rwlock.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h b/include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h index 0caf81f..74eaf4d 100644 --- a/include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h +++ b/include/linux/percpu-rwlock.h @@ -28,7 +28,13 @@ #include #include +struct rw_state { + unsigned long reader_refcnt; + bool writer_signal; +}; + struct percpu_rwlock { + struct rw_state __percpu *rw_state; rwlock_t global_rwlock; }; @@ -41,6 +47,8 @@ extern void percpu_write_unlock(struct percpu_rwlock *); extern int __percpu_init_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *, const char *, struct lock_class_key *); +extern void percpu_free_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *); + #define percpu_init_rwlock(pcpu_rwlock) \ ({ static struct lock_class_key rwlock_key; \ __percpu_init_rwlock(pcpu_rwlock, #pcpu_rwlock, &rwlock_key); \ diff --git a/lib/percpu-rwlock.c b/lib/percpu-rwlock.c index 111a238..f938096 100644 --- a/lib/percpu-rwlock.c +++ b/lib/percpu-rwlock.c @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ int __percpu_init_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *rwlock_key) { + pcpu_rwlock->rw_state = alloc_percpu(struct rw_state); + if (unlikely(!pcpu_rwlock->rw_state)) + return -ENOMEM; + /* ->global_rwlock represents the whole percpu_rwlock for lockdep */ #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK __rwlock_init(&pcpu_rwlock->global_rwlock, name, rwlock_key); @@ -41,6 +45,14 @@ int __percpu_init_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock, return 0; } +void percpu_free_rwlock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock) +{ + free_percpu(pcpu_rwlock->rw_state); + + /* Catch use-after-free bugs */ + pcpu_rwlock->rw_state = NULL; +} + void percpu_read_lock(struct percpu_rwlock *pcpu_rwlock) { read_lock(&pcpu_rwlock->global_rwlock);