Message ID | 20140225200447.GA1872@titan.lakedaemon.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 02/25/2014 09:04 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > Sebastian, > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:23:35PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >> [Cooked down Cc list to relevant people and added Ezequiel who agreed >> to test on Armada 375/38x.] >> >> On 02/25/2014 04:43 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 04:30:45PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >>>> On 02/25/14 16:16, Jason Cooper wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:36:54AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> wrote: >>>>>>> I've now created mvebu/pinctrl-dove for this series. It's based on >>>>>>> v3.14-rc1, and depends on mvebu/pinctrl (which depends on >>>>>>> mvebu/pinctrl-3xx). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've kept this series in a separate branch in case we encounter an >>>>>>> unforeseen problem with something in here. Then this branch can be >>>>>>> dropped, and /pinctrl-3xx and /pinctrl will still make it in. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, all patches except 3 and 4 are in mvebu/pinctrl-dove. 3 and 4 are >>>>>>> in mvebu/dt. >>>>>> >>>>>> OK so what should I be pulling in first now? >>>>> >>>>> Of course I woke up this morning not happy with this :-/ Here's what it >>>>> looks like currently: >>>>> >>>>> /v3.14-rc1 >>>>> | >>>>> --+---+---+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl-3xx >>>>> | \ >>>>> |---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl >>>>> \ \ >>>>> \---------------------------+---+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl-dove >>>>> >>>>> Not to scale. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I would prefer to do: >>>>> >>>>> /v3.14-rc1 >>>>> | >>>>> --+---+---+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl-cleanup >>>>> | \ >>>>> |----------------+--+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl-3xx >>>>> \ \ >>>>> \----------------+---+---+--+---+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl-dove >>>>> >>>>> But this would mean moving some patches to branches other than what they >>>>> were sent with. The advantage is that /pinctrl-3xx and /pinctrl-dove >>>>> don't depend on each other, and only depend on -cleanup. Which is great >>>>> if there is something wrong in either branch. >>>>> >>>>> Sebastian, I can cherry-pick the patches around, but you know the code >>>>> better than any of us, do you foresee any problems with this scenario? >>>> >>>> If Thomas agrees, I can rework Armada 375/38x pinctrl stubs to fit on >>>> mvebu/pinctrl. That should allow you to have mvebu/pinctrl-dove >>>> independent of mvebu/pinctrl-3xx. >>>> >>>> Not a big deal, I'd just pick 375/38x patches from mvebu/pinctrl and >>>> squash them into mvebu/pinctrl-3xx. The only "issue" is that DT >>>> documentation update patches from mvebu/pinctrl-dove have to be split >>>> too. >>>> >>>> I'll prepare the three new branches for you and Thomas to look at >>>> today. >>> >>> Ok, great. Thanks Sebastian! >> >> Ok, branches based on v3.14-rc1 with above dependencies can be found on: >> >> https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git for-mvebu/pinctrl-cleanup >> https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git for-mvebu/pinctrl-3xx >> https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git for-mvebu/pinctrl-dove >> >> and an a-i-o branch to ease testing: >> >> https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git for-mvebu/all-merged-in >> >> @Jason: I guess we should resend all three branches as individual >> patches on list somehow. > > Damn! So close! > > $ git diff mvebu/pinctrl-dove shesselba/for-mvebu/all-merged-in > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi > index 2b76524f4aa7..eeb08edb67ac 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi > @@ -390,7 +390,9 @@ > > pinctrl: pin-ctrl@d0200 { > compatible = "marvell,dove-pinctrl"; > - reg = <0xd0200 0x10>; > + reg = <0xd0200 0x14>, > + <0xd0440 0x04>, > + <0xd802c 0x08>; > clocks = <&gate_clk 22>; > > pmx_gpio_0: pmx-gpio-0 { > @@ -614,6 +616,12 @@ > interrupts = <5>; > }; > > + gconf: global-config@e802c { > + compatible = "marvell,dove-global-config", > + "syscon"; > + reg = <0xe802c 0x14>; > + }; > + > gpio2: gpio-ctrl@e8400 { > compatible = "marvell,orion-gpio"; > #gpio-cells = <2>; > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-38x.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-38x.c > index 322ca8cb63eb..1049f82fb62f 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-38x.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-38x.c > @@ -428,7 +428,6 @@ static int armada_38x_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(mpp_base); > > soc->variant = (unsigned) match->data & 0xff; > - > soc->controls = armada_38x_mpp_controls; > soc->ncontrols = ARRAY_SIZE(armada_38x_mpp_controls); > soc->gpioranges = armada_38x_mpp_gpio_ranges; > > > If you can drop the dtsi changes (I have them in mvebu/dt), and fix the > whitespace change, then we can merge them as is. Done. > Thanks a ton for handling this! No problem, thanks for resolving the dependencies :) Sebastian
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:04:47PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:23:35PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > [Cooked down Cc list to relevant people and added Ezequiel who agreed > > to test on Armada 375/38x.] > > [..] > > If you can drop the dtsi changes (I have them in mvebu/dt), and fix the > whitespace change, then we can merge them as is. > Tested for-next on Armada 375 and Armada 385 development boards. The pinctrl debugfs looks correct. I've been using for-next for a couple days now, without issues.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:38:32AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:04:47PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:23:35PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > > [Cooked down Cc list to relevant people and added Ezequiel who agreed > > > to test on Armada 375/38x.] > > > > [..] > > > > If you can drop the dtsi changes (I have them in mvebu/dt), and fix the > > whitespace change, then we can merge them as is. > > > > Tested for-next on Armada 375 and Armada 385 development boards. The > pinctrl debugfs looks correct. > > I've been using for-next for a couple days now, without issues. Great! Thanks, Ezequiel! thx, Jason.
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi index 2b76524f4aa7..eeb08edb67ac 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi @@ -390,7 +390,9 @@ pinctrl: pin-ctrl@d0200 { compatible = "marvell,dove-pinctrl"; - reg = <0xd0200 0x10>; + reg = <0xd0200 0x14>, + <0xd0440 0x04>, + <0xd802c 0x08>; clocks = <&gate_clk 22>; pmx_gpio_0: pmx-gpio-0 { @@ -614,6 +616,12 @@ interrupts = <5>; }; + gconf: global-config@e802c { + compatible = "marvell,dove-global-config", + "syscon"; + reg = <0xe802c 0x14>; + }; + gpio2: gpio-ctrl@e8400 { compatible = "marvell,orion-gpio"; #gpio-cells = <2>; diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-38x.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-38x.c index 322ca8cb63eb..1049f82fb62f 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-38x.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-38x.c @@ -428,7 +428,6 @@ static int armada_38x_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(mpp_base); soc->variant = (unsigned) match->data & 0xff; - soc->controls = armada_38x_mpp_controls; soc->ncontrols = ARRAY_SIZE(armada_38x_mpp_controls); soc->gpioranges = armada_38x_mpp_gpio_ranges;