Message ID | 201409201940.AHG21834.LJOFFHSFQOtVMO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote: > Can you apply below patch before new PFA_* are defined? > Cgroups code might want to define PFA_SPREAD_PAGE as 1 and PFA_SPREAD_SLAB as 2. > ---------------------------------------- > >From 8543e68adb210142fa347d8bc9d83df0bb2c5291 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:24:23 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH 3.17-rc5] Fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant. > > Commit 1d4457f99928 ("sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags") > defined PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS as hexadecimal value, but it is confusing > because it is used as bit number. Redefine it as decimal bit number. > > Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> > --- > include/linux/sched.h | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h > index 5c2c885..4557765 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sched.h > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h > @@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags) > } > > /* Per-process atomic flags. */ > -#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0x00000001 /* May not gain new privileges. */ > +#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0 /* May not gain new privileges. */ > > static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p) > { Thanks, good catch. Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> -Kees
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index 5c2c885..4557765 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags) } /* Per-process atomic flags. */ -#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0x00000001 /* May not gain new privileges. */ +#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0 /* May not gain new privileges. */ static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p) {