Message ID | 20170201124630.6016-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi, On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:46:21PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > +static int __init early_init_dt_scan_usablemem(unsigned long node, > + const char *uname, int depth, void *data) > +{ > + struct memblock_region *usablemem = (struct memblock_region *)data; Nit: unnecessary cast. > + const __be32 *reg; > + int len; > + > + usablemem->size = 0; Could we please lift this assignment/initialisation into the caller... > + > + if (depth != 1 || strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0) > + return 0; > + > + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,usable-memory-range", &len); > + if (!reg || (len < (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells))) > + return 1; > + > + usablemem->base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, ®); > + usablemem->size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, ®); > + > + return 1; > +} > + > +static void __init fdt_enforce_memory_region(void) > +{ > + struct memblock_region reg; ... e.g. have: struct memblock_region reg = { .size = 0, }; That saves us from making unnecessary assignments to the size field, and makes it clear that reg.size has definitely been initialised, regardless of what of_scan_flat_dt() happens to do. With that: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Thanks, Mark. > + > + of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_usablemem, ®); > + > + if (reg.size) > + memblock_cap_memory_range(reg.base, reg.size); > +} > + > void __init arm64_memblock_init(void) > { > const s64 linear_region_size = -(s64)PAGE_OFFSET; > > + /* Handle linux,usable-memory-range property */ > + fdt_enforce_memory_region(); > + > /* > * Ensure that the linear region takes up exactly half of the kernel > * virtual address space. This way, we can distinguish a linear address > -- > 2.11.0 >
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 03:07:00PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:46:21PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > +static int __init early_init_dt_scan_usablemem(unsigned long node, > > + const char *uname, int depth, void *data) > > +{ > > + struct memblock_region *usablemem = (struct memblock_region *)data; > > Nit: unnecessary cast. OK > > + const __be32 *reg; > > + int len; > > + > > + usablemem->size = 0; > > Could we please lift this assignment/initialisation into the caller... > > > + > > + if (depth != 1 || strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0) > > + return 0; > > + > > + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,usable-memory-range", &len); > > + if (!reg || (len < (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells))) > > + return 1; > > + > > + usablemem->base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, ®); > > + usablemem->size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, ®); > > + > > + return 1; > > +} > > + > > +static void __init fdt_enforce_memory_region(void) > > +{ > > + struct memblock_region reg; > > ... e.g. have: > > struct memblock_region reg = { > .size = 0, > }; Sure > That saves us from making unnecessary assignments to the size field, and > makes it clear that reg.size has definitely been initialised, regardless > of what of_scan_flat_dt() happens to do. > > With that: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Thanks, -Takahiro AKASHI > Thanks, > Mark. > > > + > > + of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_usablemem, ®); > > + > > + if (reg.size) > > + memblock_cap_memory_range(reg.base, reg.size); > > +} > > + > > void __init arm64_memblock_init(void) > > { > > const s64 linear_region_size = -(s64)PAGE_OFFSET; > > > > + /* Handle linux,usable-memory-range property */ > > + fdt_enforce_memory_region(); > > + > > /* > > * Ensure that the linear region takes up exactly half of the kernel > > * virtual address space. This way, we can distinguish a linear address > > -- > > 2.11.0 > >
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c index 380ebe705093..6cddb566eb21 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c @@ -187,10 +187,45 @@ static int __init early_mem(char *p) } early_param("mem", early_mem); +static int __init early_init_dt_scan_usablemem(unsigned long node, + const char *uname, int depth, void *data) +{ + struct memblock_region *usablemem = (struct memblock_region *)data; + const __be32 *reg; + int len; + + usablemem->size = 0; + + if (depth != 1 || strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0) + return 0; + + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,usable-memory-range", &len); + if (!reg || (len < (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells))) + return 1; + + usablemem->base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, ®); + usablemem->size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, ®); + + return 1; +} + +static void __init fdt_enforce_memory_region(void) +{ + struct memblock_region reg; + + of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_usablemem, ®); + + if (reg.size) + memblock_cap_memory_range(reg.base, reg.size); +} + void __init arm64_memblock_init(void) { const s64 linear_region_size = -(s64)PAGE_OFFSET; + /* Handle linux,usable-memory-range property */ + fdt_enforce_memory_region(); + /* * Ensure that the linear region takes up exactly half of the kernel * virtual address space. This way, we can distinguish a linear address