Message ID | 20170404065803.4848-1-stephen.boyd@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Stephen, On 04/04/17 07:58, Stephen Boyd wrote: > If a page is marked read only we should print out that fact, > instead of printing out that there was a page fault. Right now we > get a cryptic error message that something went wrong with an > unhandled fault, but we don't evaluate the esr to figure out that > it was a read/write permission fault. > > Instead of seeing: > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff000008e460d8 > pgd = ffff800003504000 > [ffff000008e460d8] *pgd=0000000083473003, *pud=0000000083503003, *pmd=0000000000000000 > Internal error: Oops: 9600004f [#1] PREEMPT SMP > > we'll see: > > Unable to handle kernel write to read-only memory at virtual address ffff000008e760d8 > pgd = ffff80003d3de000 > [ffff000008e760d8] *pgd=0000000083472003, *pud=0000000083435003, *pmd=0000000000000000 > Internal error: Oops: 9600004f [#1] PREEMPT SMP > > We also fold the userspace address check into is_permission_fault() > instead of at the current callsite so that the function can't be > abused with software PAN and a kernel space address. > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > index 156169c6981b..c6560cb4ef50 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > @@ -321,7 +337,7 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, > mm_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; > } > > - if (addr < USER_DS && is_permission_fault(esr, regs)) { > + if (is_permission_fault(esr, regs, addr)) { > /* regs->orig_addr_limit may be 0 if we entered from EL0 */ > if (regs->orig_addr_limit == KERNEL_DS) > die("Accessing user space memory with fs=KERNEL_DS", regs, esr); > This change means the PAN checks claim permission faults on kernel addresses too, we need to keep the addr check for these. (sorry, I missed this detail first time round) When I tried lkdtm's 'WRITE_RO' test it gave: > [ 2114.718807] Internal error: Accessing user space memory outside uaccess.h > routines: 9600004e [#1] PREEMPT SMP With this hunk omitted I got the expected: > [ 1476.243296] Unable to handle kernel write to read-only memory at virtual > address ffff000008a11f10 I also gave this a spin on software-models with PAN and PAN+UAO, and TTBR0-PAN on Juno. With that hunk omitted: Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Thanks, James
On 04/03/2017 11:58 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > If a page is marked read only we should print out that fact, > instead of printing out that there was a page fault. Right now we > get a cryptic error message that something went wrong with an > unhandled fault, but we don't evaluate the esr to figure out that > it was a read/write permission fault. > > Instead of seeing: > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff000008e460d8 > pgd = ffff800003504000 > [ffff000008e460d8] *pgd=0000000083473003, *pud=0000000083503003, *pmd=0000000000000000 > Internal error: Oops: 9600004f [#1] PREEMPT SMP > > we'll see: > > Unable to handle kernel write to read-only memory at virtual address ffff000008e760d8 > pgd = ffff80003d3de000 > [ffff000008e760d8] *pgd=0000000083472003, *pud=0000000083435003, *pmd=0000000000000000 > Internal error: Oops: 9600004f [#1] PREEMPT SMP > > We also fold the userspace address check into is_permission_fault() > instead of at the current callsite so that the function can't be > abused with software PAN and a kernel space address. > > Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> > Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org> Acked-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> > --- > > Changes from v2: > * Fold addr check into is_permission_fault() (James Morse) > > Changes from v1: > * Move into __do_kernel_fault() (Mark Rutland) > > arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > index 156169c6981b..c6560cb4ef50 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > @@ -160,12 +160,32 @@ static bool is_el1_instruction_abort(unsigned int esr) > return ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR; > } > > +static inline bool is_permission_fault(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs, > + unsigned long addr) > +{ > + unsigned int ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr); > + unsigned int fsc_type = esr & ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE; > + > + if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR && ec != ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR) > + return false; > + > + if (fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM) > + return true; > + > + if (addr < USER_DS && system_uses_ttbr0_pan()) > + return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT && > + (regs->pstate & PSR_PAN_BIT); > + > + return false; > +} > + > /* > * The kernel tried to access some page that wasn't present. > */ > static void __do_kernel_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, > unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) > { > + const char *msg; > /* > * Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? > * We are almost certainly not prepared to handle instruction faults. > @@ -177,9 +197,20 @@ static void __do_kernel_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, > * No handler, we'll have to terminate things with extreme prejudice. > */ > bust_spinlocks(1); > - pr_alert("Unable to handle kernel %s at virtual address %08lx\n", > - (addr < PAGE_SIZE) ? "NULL pointer dereference" : > - "paging request", addr); > + > + if (is_permission_fault(esr, regs, addr)) { > + if (esr & ESR_ELx_WNR) > + msg = "write to read-only memory"; > + else > + msg = "read from unreadable memory"; > + } else if (addr < PAGE_SIZE) { > + msg = "NULL pointer dereference"; > + } else { > + msg = "paging request"; > + } > + > + pr_alert("Unable to handle kernel %s at virtual address %08lx\n", msg, > + addr); > > show_pte(mm, addr); > die("Oops", regs, esr); > @@ -269,21 +300,6 @@ static int __do_page_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, > return fault; > } > > -static inline bool is_permission_fault(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) > -{ > - unsigned int ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr); > - unsigned int fsc_type = esr & ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE; > - > - if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR && ec != ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR) > - return false; > - > - if (system_uses_ttbr0_pan()) > - return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT && > - (regs->pstate & PSR_PAN_BIT); > - else > - return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM; > -} > - > static bool is_el0_instruction_abort(unsigned int esr) > { > return ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW; > @@ -321,7 +337,7 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, > mm_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; > } > > - if (addr < USER_DS && is_permission_fault(esr, regs)) { > + if (is_permission_fault(esr, regs, addr)) { > /* regs->orig_addr_limit may be 0 if we entered from EL0 */ > if (regs->orig_addr_limit == KERNEL_DS) > die("Accessing user space memory with fs=KERNEL_DS", regs, esr); >
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c index 156169c6981b..c6560cb4ef50 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c @@ -160,12 +160,32 @@ static bool is_el1_instruction_abort(unsigned int esr) return ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR; } +static inline bool is_permission_fault(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs, + unsigned long addr) +{ + unsigned int ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr); + unsigned int fsc_type = esr & ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE; + + if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR && ec != ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR) + return false; + + if (fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM) + return true; + + if (addr < USER_DS && system_uses_ttbr0_pan()) + return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT && + (regs->pstate & PSR_PAN_BIT); + + return false; +} + /* * The kernel tried to access some page that wasn't present. */ static void __do_kernel_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) { + const char *msg; /* * Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? * We are almost certainly not prepared to handle instruction faults. @@ -177,9 +197,20 @@ static void __do_kernel_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, * No handler, we'll have to terminate things with extreme prejudice. */ bust_spinlocks(1); - pr_alert("Unable to handle kernel %s at virtual address %08lx\n", - (addr < PAGE_SIZE) ? "NULL pointer dereference" : - "paging request", addr); + + if (is_permission_fault(esr, regs, addr)) { + if (esr & ESR_ELx_WNR) + msg = "write to read-only memory"; + else + msg = "read from unreadable memory"; + } else if (addr < PAGE_SIZE) { + msg = "NULL pointer dereference"; + } else { + msg = "paging request"; + } + + pr_alert("Unable to handle kernel %s at virtual address %08lx\n", msg, + addr); show_pte(mm, addr); die("Oops", regs, esr); @@ -269,21 +300,6 @@ static int __do_page_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, return fault; } -static inline bool is_permission_fault(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - unsigned int ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr); - unsigned int fsc_type = esr & ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE; - - if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR && ec != ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR) - return false; - - if (system_uses_ttbr0_pan()) - return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT && - (regs->pstate & PSR_PAN_BIT); - else - return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM; -} - static bool is_el0_instruction_abort(unsigned int esr) { return ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW; @@ -321,7 +337,7 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, mm_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; } - if (addr < USER_DS && is_permission_fault(esr, regs)) { + if (is_permission_fault(esr, regs, addr)) { /* regs->orig_addr_limit may be 0 if we entered from EL0 */ if (regs->orig_addr_limit == KERNEL_DS) die("Accessing user space memory with fs=KERNEL_DS", regs, esr);
If a page is marked read only we should print out that fact, instead of printing out that there was a page fault. Right now we get a cryptic error message that something went wrong with an unhandled fault, but we don't evaluate the esr to figure out that it was a read/write permission fault. Instead of seeing: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff000008e460d8 pgd = ffff800003504000 [ffff000008e460d8] *pgd=0000000083473003, *pud=0000000083503003, *pmd=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 9600004f [#1] PREEMPT SMP we'll see: Unable to handle kernel write to read-only memory at virtual address ffff000008e760d8 pgd = ffff80003d3de000 [ffff000008e760d8] *pgd=0000000083472003, *pud=0000000083435003, *pmd=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 9600004f [#1] PREEMPT SMP We also fold the userspace address check into is_permission_fault() instead of at the current callsite so that the function can't be abused with software PAN and a kernel space address. Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org> --- Changes from v2: * Fold addr check into is_permission_fault() (James Morse) Changes from v1: * Move into __do_kernel_fault() (Mark Rutland) arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)