From patchwork Wed May 24 19:06:51 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Antoine Tenart X-Patchwork-Id: 9746947 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC2060246 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 21:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFD526E16 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 21:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 00AD826E4D; Wed, 24 May 2017 21:27:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [65.50.211.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 889D326E16 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 21:27:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=pd7ZILHsm4YnGti5N/09OThFxZuVb1kvOp7IWKn+gA0=; b=cgqGxWUqncBygseKj7zNPYvJ/u o/5V1qbngQR7V8igH02Oi7ungxO5n6+EjzMb4hBeUCVF2lv8m0TeNiS6sgGP56ZO/Ks6rhlR5mKPu K2Gm5XKOt14X5PWVmcfUvK4ftesYGcszRDdwKhXnQgmBoawQPrQsnLV04IqNrUpn49DVuGogc0PPc hEjUjU5VmhhAqfNN67HKRQgY5KDAQGDUSPG1POF+0hlVF4YCe75wU+HbTgmQkXHoeh39YrYwlTTsF h5n+CMl/7klo6B2T7trxxCCoYJq3fTBqNOH957D6Leek1Eo+A4HRaIR6RmMKZzvOLmhLMWV00alV5 QNBTy9Wg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1dDdom-0001lg-2Q; Wed, 24 May 2017 21:27:44 +0000 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1dDdoZ-0001Wx-Do for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 21:27:33 +0000 Received: by mail.free-electrons.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id D2AA120824; Wed, 24 May 2017 23:27:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (unknown [80.12.37.224]) by mail.free-electrons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DB2320772; Wed, 24 May 2017 23:27:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Antoine Tenart To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, wens@csie.org, clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH 10/11] crypto: sun4i-ss: fix large block size support Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:06:51 +0200 Message-Id: <20170524190652.13278-11-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.4 In-Reply-To: <20170524190652.13278-1-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> References: <20170524190652.13278-1-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20170524_142731_634041_8DC8EF61 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.22 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Antoine Tenart , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP The run-time self-tests fail quite early, as soon as the input block size is larger than 64 bytes: alg: hash: Test 4 failed for sha1-sun4i-ss 00000000: b9 c9 1e 52 c0 26 d8 39 81 ff f2 3c 99 b1 27 b2 00000010: 30 d6 c9 85 One thing to notice is the value of the last word, which is the one expected (it can sometime be the last two words). The datasheet isn't very clear about when the digest is ready to retrieve and is seems the bit SS_DATA_END is cleared when the digest was computed *but* that doesn't mean the digest is ready to retrieve in the registers. A ndelay(1) is added before reading the computed digest to ensure it is available in the SS_MD[] registers. Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart --- drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c b/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c index 685de5b6ab17..6da8d2bbd4da 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c @@ -358,6 +358,15 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) goto release_ss; } + /* + * The datasheet isn't very clear about when to retrieve the digest. The + * bit SS_DATA_END is cleared when the engine has processed the data and + * when the digest is computed *but* it doesn't mean the digest is + * available in the diesgt registers. Hence the delay to be sure we can + * read it. + */ + ndelay(1); + for (i = 0; i < crypto_ahash_digestsize(tfm) / 4; i++) op->hash[i] = readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4); @@ -446,6 +455,15 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) goto release_ss; } + /* + * The datasheet isn't very clear about when to retrieve the digest. The + * bit SS_DATA_END is cleared when the engine has processed the data and + * when the digest is computed *but* it doesn't mean the digest is + * available in the diesgt registers. Hence the delay to be sure we can + * read it. + */ + ndelay(1); + /* Get the hash from the device */ if (op->mode == SS_OP_SHA1) { for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {