Message ID | 20170930034057.15166-8-opendmb@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Doug, Nice description of the problem with dealing with a pending disabled wake interrupt and the solution. A few remarks: On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 08:40:57PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c > index 752a46ce3589..c964ed71a68d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c > @@ -19,17 +19,29 @@ > #include <linux/irqdomain.h> > #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > -#include <linux/reboot.h> > - > -#define GIO_BANK_SIZE 0x20 > -#define GIO_ODEN(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x00) > -#define GIO_DATA(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x04) > -#define GIO_IODIR(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x08) > -#define GIO_EC(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x0c) > -#define GIO_EI(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x10) > -#define GIO_MASK(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x14) > -#define GIO_LEVEL(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x18) > -#define GIO_STAT(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x1c) > + > +enum gio_reg_index { > + GIO_REG_ODEN = 0, > + GIO_REG_DATA, > + GIO_REG_IODIR, > + GIO_REG_EC, > + GIO_REG_EI, > + GIO_REG_MASK, > + GIO_REG_LEVEL, > + GIO_REG_STAT, > + GIO_REG_COUNT Please change the name or add a comment to make it clear that this is not for an actual register. > +}; > + > [snip] > @@ -37,6 +49,8 @@ struct brcmstb_gpio_bank { > struct gpio_chip gc; > struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *parent_priv; > u32 width; > + u32 wake_active; > + u32 regs[GIO_REG_STAT]; /* Don't save and restore GIO_REG_STAT */ Consider naming to make it clearer that this is for save/restore, not some kind of shadow reg implementation or anything like that. > }; > > struct brcmstb_gpio_priv { > @@ -49,7 +63,6 @@ struct brcmstb_gpio_priv { > int gpio_base; > int num_gpios; > int parent_wake_irq; > - struct notifier_block reboot_notifier; > }; > > #define MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK 32 > @@ -65,15 +78,22 @@ brcmstb_gpio_gc_to_priv(struct gpio_chip *gc) > } > > static unsigned long > -brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank) > +__brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank) > { > void __iomem *reg_base = bank->parent_priv->reg_base; > + > + return bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_STAT(bank->id)) & > + bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id)); > +} > + > +static unsigned long > +brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank) > +{ > unsigned long status; > unsigned long flags; > > spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->gc.bgpio_lock, flags); > - status = bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_STAT(bank->id)) & > - bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id)); > + status = __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->gc.bgpio_lock, flags); > > return status; > @@ -209,11 +229,6 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_priv_set_wake(struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv, > { > int ret = 0; > > - /* > - * Only enable wake IRQ once for however many hwirqs can wake > - * since they all use the same wake IRQ. Mask will be set > - * up appropriately thanks to IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND flag. > - */ > if (enable) > ret = enable_irq_wake(priv->parent_wake_irq); > else > @@ -227,7 +242,17 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_priv_set_wake(struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv, > static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int enable) > { > struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > - struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = brcmstb_gpio_gc_to_priv(gc); > + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(gc); > + struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = bank->parent_priv; > + u32 mask = BIT(brcmstb_gpio_hwirq_to_offset(d->hwirq, bank)); > + > + /* Do not do anything specific for now, suspend/resume callbacks will > + * configure the interrupt mask appropriately > + */ Please fix comment format (this is the network subsystem style). > > [snip] > @@ -508,6 +511,99 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, > [...] > +static void brcmstb_gpio_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + /* Enable GPIO for S5 cold boot */ > + brcmstb_gpio_quiesce(&pdev->dev, 0); nit: use false instead of 0 (it's a bool). > +} > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > [snip] > +static int brcmstb_gpio_resume(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank; > + u32 wake_mask = 0; This isn't really being used as a mask, contrary to appearances. It's just tracking whether any active IRQs were seen. Please change to use a bool instead and adjust the name accordingly. > + > + list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node) { > + wake_mask |= __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank); > + brcmstb_gpio_bank_restore(priv, bank); > + } > + > + if (priv->parent_wake_irq && wake_mask) > + pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0); > + > + /* enable non-wake interrupt */ > + if (priv->parent_irq >= 0) > + enable_irq(priv->parent_irq); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +#else > +#define brcmstb_gpio_suspend NULL > +#define brcmstb_gpio_resume NULL > +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ > + > +static const struct dev_pm_ops brcmstb_gpio_pm_ops = { > + .suspend_noirq = brcmstb_gpio_suspend, > + .resume_noirq = brcmstb_gpio_resume, > +}; > + > static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > @@ -517,7 +613,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct resource *res; > struct property *prop; > const __be32 *p; > - u32 bank_width; > + u32 bank_width, wake_mask = 0; Same comment on wake_mask as for brcmstb_gpio_resume() above. > int num_banks = 0; > int err; > static int gpio_base; > @@ -617,6 +713,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > * Mask all interrupts by default, since wakeup interrupts may > * be retained from S5 cold boot > */ > + wake_mask |= __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank); > gc->write_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id), 0); > > err = gpiochip_add_data(gc, bank); > @@ -646,6 +743,9 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > dev_info(dev, "Registered %d banks (GPIO(s): %d-%d)\n", > num_banks, priv->gpio_base, gpio_base - 1); > > + if (priv->parent_wake_irq && wake_mask) > + pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0); Why is this called in probe? Thanks, Gregory
On 10/19/2017 02:03 AM, Gregory Fong wrote: > Hi Doug, > > Nice description of the problem with dealing with a pending disabled > wake interrupt and the solution. A few remarks: > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 08:40:57PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c >> index 752a46ce3589..c964ed71a68d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c >> @@ -19,17 +19,29 @@ >> #include <linux/irqdomain.h> >> #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> >> #include <linux/interrupt.h> >> -#include <linux/reboot.h> >> - >> -#define GIO_BANK_SIZE 0x20 >> -#define GIO_ODEN(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x00) >> -#define GIO_DATA(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x04) >> -#define GIO_IODIR(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x08) >> -#define GIO_EC(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x0c) >> -#define GIO_EI(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x10) >> -#define GIO_MASK(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x14) >> -#define GIO_LEVEL(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x18) >> -#define GIO_STAT(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x1c) >> + >> +enum gio_reg_index { >> + GIO_REG_ODEN = 0, >> + GIO_REG_DATA, >> + GIO_REG_IODIR, >> + GIO_REG_EC, >> + GIO_REG_EI, >> + GIO_REG_MASK, >> + GIO_REG_LEVEL, >> + GIO_REG_STAT, >> + GIO_REG_COUNT > > Please change the name or add a comment to make it clear that this is > not for an actual register. > Will do. >> +}; >> + >> [snip] >> @@ -37,6 +49,8 @@ struct brcmstb_gpio_bank { >> struct gpio_chip gc; >> struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *parent_priv; >> u32 width; >> + u32 wake_active; >> + u32 regs[GIO_REG_STAT]; /* Don't save and restore GIO_REG_STAT */ > > Consider naming to make it clearer that this is for save/restore, not > some kind of shadow reg implementation or anything like that. > Will do. >> }; >> >> struct brcmstb_gpio_priv { >> @@ -49,7 +63,6 @@ struct brcmstb_gpio_priv { >> int gpio_base; >> int num_gpios; >> int parent_wake_irq; >> - struct notifier_block reboot_notifier; >> }; >> >> #define MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK 32 >> @@ -65,15 +78,22 @@ brcmstb_gpio_gc_to_priv(struct gpio_chip *gc) >> } >> >> static unsigned long >> -brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank) >> +__brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank) >> { >> void __iomem *reg_base = bank->parent_priv->reg_base; >> + >> + return bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_STAT(bank->id)) & >> + bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id)); >> +} >> + >> +static unsigned long >> +brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank) >> +{ >> unsigned long status; >> unsigned long flags; >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->gc.bgpio_lock, flags); >> - status = bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_STAT(bank->id)) & >> - bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id)); >> + status = __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank); >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->gc.bgpio_lock, flags); >> >> return status; >> @@ -209,11 +229,6 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_priv_set_wake(struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv, >> { >> int ret = 0; >> >> - /* >> - * Only enable wake IRQ once for however many hwirqs can wake >> - * since they all use the same wake IRQ. Mask will be set >> - * up appropriately thanks to IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND flag. >> - */ >> if (enable) >> ret = enable_irq_wake(priv->parent_wake_irq); >> else >> @@ -227,7 +242,17 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_priv_set_wake(struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv, >> static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int enable) >> { >> struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); >> - struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = brcmstb_gpio_gc_to_priv(gc); >> + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(gc); >> + struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = bank->parent_priv; >> + u32 mask = BIT(brcmstb_gpio_hwirq_to_offset(d->hwirq, bank)); >> + >> + /* Do not do anything specific for now, suspend/resume callbacks will >> + * configure the interrupt mask appropriately >> + */ > > Please fix comment format (this is the network subsystem style). > Thanks, force of habit ;). >> >> [snip] >> @@ -508,6 +511,99 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, >> [...] >> +static void brcmstb_gpio_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + /* Enable GPIO for S5 cold boot */ >> + brcmstb_gpio_quiesce(&pdev->dev, 0); > > nit: use false instead of 0 (it's a bool). > Will do. >> +} >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> [snip] >> +static int brcmstb_gpio_resume(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank; >> + u32 wake_mask = 0; > > This isn't really being used as a mask, contrary to appearances. It's > just tracking whether any active IRQs were seen. Please change to use a > bool instead and adjust the name accordingly. > I see your point, but I believe it is cleaner to use this to consolidate the bit masks returned by each __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs() call. This allows a single test rather than a test per bank. >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node) { >> + wake_mask |= __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank); >> + brcmstb_gpio_bank_restore(priv, bank); >> + } >> + >> + if (priv->parent_wake_irq && wake_mask) >> + pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0); >> + >> + /* enable non-wake interrupt */ >> + if (priv->parent_irq >= 0) >> + enable_irq(priv->parent_irq); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +#else >> +#define brcmstb_gpio_suspend NULL >> +#define brcmstb_gpio_resume NULL >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ >> + >> +static const struct dev_pm_ops brcmstb_gpio_pm_ops = { >> + .suspend_noirq = brcmstb_gpio_suspend, >> + .resume_noirq = brcmstb_gpio_resume, >> +}; >> + >> static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> { >> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> @@ -517,7 +613,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> struct resource *res; >> struct property *prop; >> const __be32 *p; >> - u32 bank_width; >> + u32 bank_width, wake_mask = 0; > > Same comment on wake_mask as for brcmstb_gpio_resume() above. > Same response. >> int num_banks = 0; >> int err; >> static int gpio_base; >> @@ -617,6 +713,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> * Mask all interrupts by default, since wakeup interrupts may >> * be retained from S5 cold boot >> */ >> + wake_mask |= __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank); >> gc->write_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id), 0); >> >> err = gpiochip_add_data(gc, bank); >> @@ -646,6 +743,9 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> dev_info(dev, "Registered %d banks (GPIO(s): %d-%d)\n", >> num_banks, priv->gpio_base, gpio_base - 1); >> >> + if (priv->parent_wake_irq && wake_mask) >> + pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0); > > Why is this called in probe? > This allows proper wakeup accounting when waking from S5. > Thanks, > Gregory > Thanks again for the review. I will try to get a v2 out next week. Doug
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> wrote: >>> +static int brcmstb_gpio_resume(struct device *dev) >>> +{ >>> + struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>> + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank; >>> + u32 wake_mask = 0; >> >> This isn't really being used as a mask, contrary to appearances. It's >> just tracking whether any active IRQs were seen. Please change to use a >> bool instead and adjust the name accordingly. >> > > I see your point, but I believe it is cleaner to use this to consolidate > the bit masks returned by each __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs() call. > This allows a single test rather than a test per bank. What about something like this? bool need_wakeup_event = false; list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node) { need_wakeup_event |= !!__brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank); brcmstb_gpio_bank_restore(priv, bank); } if (priv->parent_wake_irq && need_wakeup_event) pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0);
On 10/20/2017 05:54 PM, Gregory Fong wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> +static int brcmstb_gpio_resume(struct device *dev) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>> + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank; >>>> + u32 wake_mask = 0; >>> >>> This isn't really being used as a mask, contrary to appearances. It's >>> just tracking whether any active IRQs were seen. Please change to use a >>> bool instead and adjust the name accordingly. >>> >> >> I see your point, but I believe it is cleaner to use this to consolidate >> the bit masks returned by each __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs() call. >> This allows a single test rather than a test per bank. > > What about something like this? > > bool need_wakeup_event = false; > > list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node) { > need_wakeup_event |= !!__brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank); > brcmstb_gpio_bank_restore(priv, bank); > } > > if (priv->parent_wake_irq && need_wakeup_event) > pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0); > It's less efficient, but it is not performance sensitive so if you feel this is more understandable I'll make the change. Thanks, Doug
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c index 752a46ce3589..c964ed71a68d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c @@ -19,17 +19,29 @@ #include <linux/irqdomain.h> #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> -#include <linux/reboot.h> - -#define GIO_BANK_SIZE 0x20 -#define GIO_ODEN(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x00) -#define GIO_DATA(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x04) -#define GIO_IODIR(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x08) -#define GIO_EC(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x0c) -#define GIO_EI(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x10) -#define GIO_MASK(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x14) -#define GIO_LEVEL(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x18) -#define GIO_STAT(bank) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + 0x1c) + +enum gio_reg_index { + GIO_REG_ODEN = 0, + GIO_REG_DATA, + GIO_REG_IODIR, + GIO_REG_EC, + GIO_REG_EI, + GIO_REG_MASK, + GIO_REG_LEVEL, + GIO_REG_STAT, + GIO_REG_COUNT +}; + +#define GIO_BANK_SIZE (GIO_REG_COUNT * sizeof(u32)) +#define GIO_BANK_OFF(bank, off) (((bank) * GIO_BANK_SIZE) + (off * sizeof(u32))) +#define GIO_ODEN(bank) GIO_BANK_OFF(bank, GIO_REG_ODEN) +#define GIO_DATA(bank) GIO_BANK_OFF(bank, GIO_REG_DATA) +#define GIO_IODIR(bank) GIO_BANK_OFF(bank, GIO_REG_IODIR) +#define GIO_EC(bank) GIO_BANK_OFF(bank, GIO_REG_EC) +#define GIO_EI(bank) GIO_BANK_OFF(bank, GIO_REG_EI) +#define GIO_MASK(bank) GIO_BANK_OFF(bank, GIO_REG_MASK) +#define GIO_LEVEL(bank) GIO_BANK_OFF(bank, GIO_REG_LEVEL) +#define GIO_STAT(bank) GIO_BANK_OFF(bank, GIO_REG_STAT) struct brcmstb_gpio_bank { struct list_head node; @@ -37,6 +49,8 @@ struct brcmstb_gpio_bank { struct gpio_chip gc; struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *parent_priv; u32 width; + u32 wake_active; + u32 regs[GIO_REG_STAT]; /* Don't save and restore GIO_REG_STAT */ }; struct brcmstb_gpio_priv { @@ -49,7 +63,6 @@ struct brcmstb_gpio_priv { int gpio_base; int num_gpios; int parent_wake_irq; - struct notifier_block reboot_notifier; }; #define MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK 32 @@ -65,15 +78,22 @@ brcmstb_gpio_gc_to_priv(struct gpio_chip *gc) } static unsigned long -brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank) +__brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank) { void __iomem *reg_base = bank->parent_priv->reg_base; + + return bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_STAT(bank->id)) & + bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id)); +} + +static unsigned long +brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank) +{ unsigned long status; unsigned long flags; spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->gc.bgpio_lock, flags); - status = bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_STAT(bank->id)) & - bank->gc.read_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id)); + status = __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->gc.bgpio_lock, flags); return status; @@ -209,11 +229,6 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_priv_set_wake(struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv, { int ret = 0; - /* - * Only enable wake IRQ once for however many hwirqs can wake - * since they all use the same wake IRQ. Mask will be set - * up appropriately thanks to IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND flag. - */ if (enable) ret = enable_irq_wake(priv->parent_wake_irq); else @@ -227,7 +242,17 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_priv_set_wake(struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv, static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int enable) { struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); - struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = brcmstb_gpio_gc_to_priv(gc); + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(gc); + struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = bank->parent_priv; + u32 mask = BIT(brcmstb_gpio_hwirq_to_offset(d->hwirq, bank)); + + /* Do not do anything specific for now, suspend/resume callbacks will + * configure the interrupt mask appropriately + */ + if (enable) + bank->wake_active |= mask; + else + bank->wake_active &= ~mask; return brcmstb_gpio_priv_set_wake(priv, enable); } @@ -238,7 +263,8 @@ static irqreturn_t brcmstb_gpio_wake_irq_handler(int irq, void *data) if (!priv || irq != priv->parent_wake_irq) return IRQ_NONE; - pm_wakeup_event(&priv->pdev->dev, 0); + + /* Nothing to do */ return IRQ_HANDLED; } @@ -278,19 +304,6 @@ static void brcmstb_gpio_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); } -static int brcmstb_gpio_reboot(struct notifier_block *nb, - unsigned long action, void *data) -{ - struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = - container_of(nb, struct brcmstb_gpio_priv, reboot_notifier); - - /* Enable GPIO for S5 cold boot */ - if (action == SYS_POWER_OFF) - brcmstb_gpio_priv_set_wake(priv, 1); - - return NOTIFY_DONE; -} - static struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *brcmstb_gpio_hwirq_to_bank( struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv, irq_hw_number_t hwirq) { @@ -395,12 +408,6 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node) gpiochip_remove(&bank->gc); - if (priv->reboot_notifier.notifier_call) { - ret = unregister_reboot_notifier(&priv->reboot_notifier); - if (ret) - dev_err(&pdev->dev, - "failed to unregister reboot notifier\n"); - } return ret; } @@ -460,9 +467,8 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, "Couldn't get wake IRQ - GPIOs will not be able to wake from sleep"); } else { /* - * Set wakeup capability before requesting wakeup - * interrupt, so we can process boot-time "wakeups" - * (e.g., from S5 cold boot) + * Set wakeup capability so we can process boot-time + * "wakeups" (e.g., from S5 cold boot) */ device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true); device_wakeup_enable(dev); @@ -475,10 +481,6 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, dev_err(dev, "Couldn't request wake IRQ"); goto out_free_domain; } - - priv->reboot_notifier.notifier_call = - brcmstb_gpio_reboot; - register_reboot_notifier(&priv->reboot_notifier); } } @@ -499,6 +501,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(priv->parent_irq, brcmstb_gpio_irq_handler, priv); + irq_set_status_flags(priv->parent_irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY); return 0; @@ -508,6 +511,99 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, return err; } +static void brcmstb_gpio_bank_save(struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv, + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank) +{ + struct gpio_chip *gc = &bank->gc; + unsigned int i; + + for (i = 0; i < GIO_REG_STAT; i++) + bank->regs[i] = gc->read_reg(priv->reg_base + + GIO_BANK_OFF(bank->id, i)); +} + +static void brcmstb_gpio_quiesce(struct device *dev, bool save) +{ + struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank; + struct gpio_chip *gc; + u32 imask; + + /* disable non-wake interrupt */ + if (priv->parent_irq >= 0) + disable_irq(priv->parent_irq); + + list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node) { + gc = &bank->gc; + + if (save) + brcmstb_gpio_bank_save(priv, bank); + + /* Unmask GPIOs which have been flagged as wake-up sources */ + if (priv->parent_wake_irq) + imask = bank->wake_active; + else + imask = 0; + gc->write_reg(priv->reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id), + imask); + } +} + +static void brcmstb_gpio_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + /* Enable GPIO for S5 cold boot */ + brcmstb_gpio_quiesce(&pdev->dev, 0); +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP +static void brcmstb_gpio_bank_restore(struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv, + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank) +{ + struct gpio_chip *gc = &bank->gc; + unsigned int i; + + for (i = 0; i < GIO_REG_STAT; i++) + gc->write_reg(priv->reg_base + GIO_BANK_OFF(bank->id, i), + bank->regs[i]); +} + +static int brcmstb_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev) +{ + brcmstb_gpio_quiesce(dev, 1); + return 0; +} + +static int brcmstb_gpio_resume(struct device *dev) +{ + struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank; + u32 wake_mask = 0; + + list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node) { + wake_mask |= __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank); + brcmstb_gpio_bank_restore(priv, bank); + } + + if (priv->parent_wake_irq && wake_mask) + pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0); + + /* enable non-wake interrupt */ + if (priv->parent_irq >= 0) + enable_irq(priv->parent_irq); + + return 0; +} + +#else +#define brcmstb_gpio_suspend NULL +#define brcmstb_gpio_resume NULL +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ + +static const struct dev_pm_ops brcmstb_gpio_pm_ops = { + .suspend_noirq = brcmstb_gpio_suspend, + .resume_noirq = brcmstb_gpio_resume, +}; + static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; @@ -517,7 +613,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct resource *res; struct property *prop; const __be32 *p; - u32 bank_width; + u32 bank_width, wake_mask = 0; int num_banks = 0; int err; static int gpio_base; @@ -617,6 +713,7 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) * Mask all interrupts by default, since wakeup interrupts may * be retained from S5 cold boot */ + wake_mask |= __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank); gc->write_reg(reg_base + GIO_MASK(bank->id), 0); err = gpiochip_add_data(gc, bank); @@ -646,6 +743,9 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) dev_info(dev, "Registered %d banks (GPIO(s): %d-%d)\n", num_banks, priv->gpio_base, gpio_base - 1); + if (priv->parent_wake_irq && wake_mask) + pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0); + return 0; fail: @@ -664,9 +764,11 @@ static struct platform_driver brcmstb_gpio_driver = { .driver = { .name = "brcmstb-gpio", .of_match_table = brcmstb_gpio_of_match, + .pm = &brcmstb_gpio_pm_ops, }, .probe = brcmstb_gpio_probe, .remove = brcmstb_gpio_remove, + .shutdown = brcmstb_gpio_shutdown, }; module_platform_driver(brcmstb_gpio_driver);
This commit corrects problems with the previous wake implementation by implementing suspend and resume power management operations and the driver shutdown operation. Wake masks are used to keep track of which GPIO should wake the device. On suspend the GPIO state is saved and the possible wakeup sources are explicitly unmasked in the hardware. Non-wakeup sources are explicitly masked so IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND is no longer necessary. The saved state of the GPIO is restored upon resume. It is important not to write to the GPIO status register since this has the effect of clearing bits. The status register is explicitly removed from the register save and restore to ensure this. The shutdown operation allows the hardware to be put into the same quiesced state as the suspend operation and removes the need for the reboot notifier. Unfortunately, there appears to be some confusion about whether a pending disabled wake interrupt should wake the system. If a wake capable interrupt is disabled using the default "lazy disable" behavior and it is triggered before the suspend_device_irq call the interrupt hardware will be acknowledged by mask_ack_irq and the IRQS_PENDING flag is added to its state. However, the IRQS_PENDING flag of wake interrupts is not checked to prevent the transition to suspend and the hardware has been acked which prevents its wakeup. If the lazy disabled interrupt is triggered after the call to suspend_device_irqs then the wakeup logic will abort the suspend. The irq_disable method is defined by this GPIO driver to prevent lazy disable so that the pending hardware state remains asserted allowing the hardware to wake and providing a consistent behavior. In addition, the IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag is set for the non-wake parent interrupt as a convenience to prevent the need to add code to the brcmstb_gpio_irq_handler to support "lazy disable" of the non-wake parent interrupt when it is disabled during suspend and resume. Chained interrupt parents are not normally disabled, but these GPIO devices have different parent interrupts for wake and non-wake handling. It is convenient to mask the non-wake parent when suspending to preserve the hardware state for proper wakeup accounting when the driver is resumed. Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> --- drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c | 200 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 151 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)