Message ID | 20180309222327.18689-7-enric.balletbo@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi, the subject is misleading I think, as this is touching only the generic bridge code and not anything Rockchip-related, so should probably be "drm/bridge"? Am Freitag, 9. März 2018, 23:22:57 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra: > From: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com> > > We currently wait for the panel to mirror our intended PSR state > before continuing on both PSR enter and PSR exit. This is really > only important to do when we're entering PSR, since we want to > be sure the last frame we pushed is being served from the panel's > internal fb before shutting down the soc blocks (vop/analogix). > > This patch changes the behavior such that we only wait for the > panel to complete the PSR transition when we're entering PSR, and > to skip verification when we're exiting. > > Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org> > Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com> > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com> > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> change itself looks good, so Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
On 12/03/18 17:58, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Hi, > > the subject is misleading I think, as this is touching only the generic > bridge code and not anything Rockchip-related, so should probably > be "drm/bridge"? > Right, I'll fix this when I need to send another version, I'll wait, for now, a bit more for reviews on the other patches. Thanks Enric > Am Freitag, 9. März 2018, 23:22:57 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra: >> From: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com> >> >> We currently wait for the panel to mirror our intended PSR state >> before continuing on both PSR enter and PSR exit. This is really >> only important to do when we're entering PSR, since we want to >> be sure the last frame we pushed is being served from the panel's >> internal fb before shutting down the soc blocks (vop/analogix). >> >> This patch changes the behavior such that we only wait for the >> panel to complete the PSR transition when we're entering PSR, and >> to skip verification when we're exiting. >> >> Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org> >> Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org> >> Signed-off-by: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com> >> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> >> Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com> >> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> >> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> > > change itself looks good, so > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> >
On Saturday 10 March 2018 03:52 AM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: > From: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com> > > We currently wait for the panel to mirror our intended PSR state > before continuing on both PSR enter and PSR exit. This is really > only important to do when we're entering PSR, since we want to > be sure the last frame we pushed is being served from the panel's > internal fb before shutting down the soc blocks (vop/analogix). > > This patch changes the behavior such that we only wait for the > panel to complete the PSR transition when we're entering PSR, and > to skip verification when we're exiting. > With the subject fix: Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org> Thanks, Archit > Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org> > Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com> > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com> > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c | 5 ++++- > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c > index 806c3878b3d6..5a2e35dc41e3 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ int analogix_dp_enable_psr(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) > psr_vsc.DB0 = 0; > psr_vsc.DB1 = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE | EDP_VSC_PSR_CRC_VALUES_VALID; > > - return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc); > + return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc, true); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_enable_psr); > > @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ int analogix_dp_disable_psr(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) > if (ret != 1) > dev_err(dp->dev, "Failed to set DP Power0 %d\n", ret); > > - return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc); > + return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc, false); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_disable_psr); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h > index 920607d7eb3e..6a96ef7e6934 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h > @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ void analogix_dp_enable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp); > void analogix_dp_disable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp); > void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp); > int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, > - struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc); > + struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc, bool blocking); > ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, > struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c > index 005a3f7005d2..9df2f3ef000c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c > @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static ssize_t analogix_dp_get_psr_status(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) > } > > int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, > - struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc) > + struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc, bool blocking) > { > unsigned int val; > int ret; > @@ -1053,6 +1053,9 @@ int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, > val |= IF_EN; > writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL); > > + if (!blocking) > + return 0; > + > ret = readx_poll_timeout(analogix_dp_get_psr_status, dp, psr_status, > psr_status >= 0 && > ((vsc->DB1 && psr_status == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB) || >
Am Freitag, 9. März 2018, 23:22:57 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra: > From: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com> > > We currently wait for the panel to mirror our intended PSR state > before continuing on both PSR enter and PSR exit. This is really > only important to do when we're entering PSR, since we want to > be sure the last frame we pushed is being served from the panel's > internal fb before shutting down the soc blocks (vop/analogix). > > This patch changes the behavior such that we only wait for the > panel to complete the PSR transition when we're entering PSR, and > to skip verification when we're exiting. > > Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org> > Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com> > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com> > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> applied to drm-misc-next with the subject fixed. Thanks Heiko
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c index 806c3878b3d6..5a2e35dc41e3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ int analogix_dp_enable_psr(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) psr_vsc.DB0 = 0; psr_vsc.DB1 = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE | EDP_VSC_PSR_CRC_VALUES_VALID; - return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc); + return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc, true); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_enable_psr); @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ int analogix_dp_disable_psr(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) if (ret != 1) dev_err(dp->dev, "Failed to set DP Power0 %d\n", ret); - return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc); + return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc, false); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_disable_psr); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h index 920607d7eb3e..6a96ef7e6934 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ void analogix_dp_enable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp); void analogix_dp_disable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp); void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp); int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, - struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc); + struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc, bool blocking); ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c index 005a3f7005d2..9df2f3ef000c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static ssize_t analogix_dp_get_psr_status(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) } int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, - struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc) + struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc, bool blocking) { unsigned int val; int ret; @@ -1053,6 +1053,9 @@ int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, val |= IF_EN; writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL); + if (!blocking) + return 0; + ret = readx_poll_timeout(analogix_dp_get_psr_status, dp, psr_status, psr_status >= 0 && ((vsc->DB1 && psr_status == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB) ||