[v4,1/3] mm: slab/slub: Add check_slab_flags function to check for valid flags

Commit Message

Nicolas Boichat Dec. 5, 2018, 5:48 a.m. UTC

Remove duplicated code between slab and slub, and will make it
easier to make the test more complicated in the next commits.

Fixes: ad67f5a6545f ("arm64: replace ZONE_DMA with ZONE_DMA32")
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <[e-mail]>
---
 mm/internal.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 mm/slab.c     |  8 +-------
 mm/slub.c     |  8 +-------
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Comments

Vlastimil Babka Dec. 5, 2018, 1:34 p.m. UTC | #1

On 12/5/18 6:48 AM, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> Remove duplicated code between slab and slub, and will make it
> easier to make the test more complicated in the next commits.
> 
> Fixes: ad67f5a6545f ("arm64: replace ZONE_DMA with ZONE_DMA32")

Well, not really. Patch 3 does that and yeah this will be a prerequisity
for a clean stable backport, but we don't tag all prerequisities like
this, I think?

> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <[e-mail]>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <[e-mail]>

Patch

diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index f0c9ccde3bdb9e..a2ee82a0cd44ae 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -33,8 +33,22 @@ 
 /* Control allocation cpuset and node placement constraints */
 #define GFP_CONSTRAINT_MASK (__GFP_HARDWALL|__GFP_THISNODE)
 
-/* Do not use these with a slab allocator */
-#define GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK (__GFP_DMA32|__GFP_HIGHMEM|~__GFP_BITS_MASK)
+/* Check for flags that must not be used with a slab allocator */
+static inline gfp_t check_slab_flags(gfp_t flags)
+{
+	gfp_t bug_mask = __GFP_DMA32 | __GFP_HIGHMEM | ~__GFP_BITS_MASK;
+
+	if (unlikely(flags & bug_mask)) {
+		gfp_t invalid_mask = flags & bug_mask;
+
+		flags &= ~bug_mask;
+		pr_warn("Unexpected gfp: %#x (%pGg). Fixing up to gfp: %#x (%pGg). Fix your code!\n",
+				invalid_mask, &invalid_mask, flags, &flags);
+		dump_stack();
+	}
+
+	return flags;
+}
 
 void page_writeback_init(void);
 
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 73fe23e649c91a..65a774f05e7836 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -2643,13 +2643,7 @@  static struct page *cache_grow_begin(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
 	 * Be lazy and only check for valid flags here,  keeping it out of the
 	 * critical path in kmem_cache_alloc().
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK)) {
-		gfp_t invalid_mask = flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK;
-		flags &= ~GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK;
-		pr_warn("Unexpected gfp: %#x (%pGg). Fixing up to gfp: %#x (%pGg). Fix your code!\n",
-				invalid_mask, &invalid_mask, flags, &flags);
-		dump_stack();
-	}
+	flags = check_slab_flags(flags);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(cachep->ctor && (flags & __GFP_ZERO));
 	local_flags = flags & (GFP_CONSTRAINT_MASK|GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
 
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index c229a9b7dd5448..21a3f6866da472 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1685,13 +1685,7 @@  static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
 
 static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
 {
-	if (unlikely(flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK)) {
-		gfp_t invalid_mask = flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK;
-		flags &= ~GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK;
-		pr_warn("Unexpected gfp: %#x (%pGg). Fixing up to gfp: %#x (%pGg). Fix your code!\n",
-				invalid_mask, &invalid_mask, flags, &flags);
-		dump_stack();
-	}
+	flags = check_slab_flags(flags);
 
 	return allocate_slab(s,
 		flags & (GFP_RECLAIM_MASK | GFP_CONSTRAINT_MASK), node);