@@ -501,14 +501,14 @@ static int __init prom_next_node(phandle *nodep)
}
}
-static inline int prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname,
- void *value, size_t valuelen)
+static inline int __init prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname,
+ void *value, size_t valuelen)
{
return call_prom("getprop", 4, 1, node, ADDR(pname),
(u32)(unsigned long) value, (u32) valuelen);
}
-static inline int prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname)
+static inline int __init prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname)
{
return call_prom("getproplen", 2, 1, node, ADDR(pname));
}
This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following modpost warnings are reported: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x20): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getprop() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getprop() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getprop lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x3c): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getproplen() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getproplen() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getproplen lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)