From patchwork Tue Nov 5 20:58:43 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ard Biesheuvel X-Patchwork-Id: 11228667 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E86F13A4 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 456D22087E for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="uWWds+T8"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="17lrDvN2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 456D22087E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=GMFbyLfl6/QgIsBSM30mXCEjwWBjvBYWgazUe9U6/Is=; b=uWWds+T80wgH7xovDpwUvBTEs5 27wc1dbdD0TYbxXBdaSyKu/jUkJOYG42p9m48moLO9L6s16Wr7U1mYF+3hY6Jj5zRkU6GTZtCzacm 9zPV0Qh9ucmG00aY7QJk4RDosgBtoLTC++oEun+zHqF9itlJgUU55cdtQPMtNasGKMVRrIf8SLAhw Ow0RWlbLdU0eyRQsCjoYe5Ln0ZoCu8A475zVt8uTSn6lEPMiDS96BT7Z+Nh/mpE3aKGjdb6or0p6z yDJjo/ey+88Ms2+Tjn9bZ+8DROHRy24QMQxE255z9DAn0sX6/soLae9bfKglG/DqGXgxQ1gbLL7JF KfGXOPhg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iS68T-0005Ow-SV; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 21:13:09 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iS5x5-0008Ug-L8 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 21:01:25 +0000 Received: from e123331-lin.home (lfbn-mar-1-643-104.w90-118.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.118.215.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1290521929; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:01:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572987682; bh=NVHYNRi4Lrrof2Q1KTtm0d9k5Uba3w85qv9oUXWA3xY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=17lrDvN2pK0vPYt6YZkLs3gYUV+dp26/tqEMfTRx049ctIXPhIplI2lLpCTY+FHrP HlrQ4VC4CMYvAzVcZbPapCjQjenU5BemETyIAXtAPlKl03OFVBK2NYE6TfTSodigso GAcGPy951Jvd0HmWxjPFQOXOXURIoOj/mFvEkdJw= From: Ard Biesheuvel To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH for-stable-v4.4 50/53] ARM: add PROC_VTABLE and PROC_TABLE macros Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:58:43 +0100 Message-Id: <20191105205846.1394-51-ardb@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20191105205846.1394-1-ardb@kernel.org> References: <20191105205846.1394-1-ardb@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191105_130123_797129_11355106 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.97 ) X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-5.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [198.145.29.99 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Sasha Levin , Florian Fainelli , Tony Lindgren , Catalin Marinas , Russell King , "David A . Long" , Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Russell King Commit e209950fdd065d2cc46e6338e47e52841b830cba upstream. Allow the way we access members of the processor vtable to be changed at compile time. We will need to move to per-CPU vtables to fix the Spectre variant 2 issues on big.Little systems. However, we have a couple of calls that do not need the vtable treatment, and indeed cause a kernel warning due to the (later) use of smp_processor_id(), so also introduce the PROC_TABLE macro for these which always use CPU 0's function pointers. Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry Signed-off-by: Russell King Signed-off-by: David A. Long Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel --- arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h | 39 +++++++++++++------- arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 4 +- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h index 19939e88efca..a1a71b068edc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/proc-fns.h @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ struct mm_struct; /* * Don't change this structure - ASM code relies on it. */ -extern struct processor { +struct processor { /* MISC * get data abort address/flags */ @@ -79,9 +79,13 @@ extern struct processor { unsigned int suspend_size; void (*do_suspend)(void *); void (*do_resume)(void *); -} processor; +}; #ifndef MULTI_CPU +static inline void init_proc_vtable(const struct processor *p) +{ +} + extern void cpu_proc_init(void); extern void cpu_proc_fin(void); extern int cpu_do_idle(void); @@ -98,18 +102,27 @@ extern void cpu_reset(unsigned long addr) __attribute__((noreturn)); extern void cpu_do_suspend(void *); extern void cpu_do_resume(void *); #else -#define cpu_proc_init processor._proc_init -#define cpu_check_bugs processor.check_bugs -#define cpu_proc_fin processor._proc_fin -#define cpu_reset processor.reset -#define cpu_do_idle processor._do_idle -#define cpu_dcache_clean_area processor.dcache_clean_area -#define cpu_set_pte_ext processor.set_pte_ext -#define cpu_do_switch_mm processor.switch_mm -/* These three are private to arch/arm/kernel/suspend.c */ -#define cpu_do_suspend processor.do_suspend -#define cpu_do_resume processor.do_resume +extern struct processor processor; +#define PROC_VTABLE(f) processor.f +#define PROC_TABLE(f) processor.f +static inline void init_proc_vtable(const struct processor *p) +{ + processor = *p; +} + +#define cpu_proc_init PROC_VTABLE(_proc_init) +#define cpu_check_bugs PROC_VTABLE(check_bugs) +#define cpu_proc_fin PROC_VTABLE(_proc_fin) +#define cpu_reset PROC_VTABLE(reset) +#define cpu_do_idle PROC_VTABLE(_do_idle) +#define cpu_dcache_clean_area PROC_TABLE(dcache_clean_area) +#define cpu_set_pte_ext PROC_TABLE(set_pte_ext) +#define cpu_do_switch_mm PROC_VTABLE(switch_mm) + +/* These two are private to arch/arm/kernel/suspend.c */ +#define cpu_do_suspend PROC_VTABLE(do_suspend) +#define cpu_do_resume PROC_VTABLE(do_resume) #endif extern void cpu_resume(void); diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c index 5aa9c08de410..13bda9574e18 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c @@ -625,9 +625,7 @@ static void __init setup_processor(void) cpu_name = list->cpu_name; __cpu_architecture = __get_cpu_architecture(); -#ifdef MULTI_CPU - processor = *list->proc; -#endif + init_proc_vtable(list->proc); #ifdef MULTI_TLB cpu_tlb = *list->tlb; #endif