@@ -65,6 +65,35 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
sdhci_enable_clk(host, clk);
}
+static void sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
+ unsigned int timing)
+{
+ u16 ctrl_2;
+
+ dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "%s: Setting UHS signaling for %d timing\n",
+ __func__, timing);
+ ctrl_2 = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
+ /* Select Bus Speed Mode for host */
+ ctrl_2 &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_MASK;
+ if ((timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200) ||
+ (timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104))
+ ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR104;
+ else if (timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR12)
+ ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR12;
+ else if (timing == MMC_TIMING_SD_HS ||
+ timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS ||
+ timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25)
+ ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR25;
+ else if (timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50)
+ ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_SDR50;
+ else if ((timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50) ||
+ (timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52))
+ ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_UHS_DDR50;
+ else if (timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400)
+ ctrl_2 |= SDHCI_CTRL_HS400; /* Non-standard */
+ sdhci_writew(host, ctrl_2, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
+}
+
static void sdhci_brcmstb_dumpregs(struct mmc_host *mmc)
{
sdhci_dumpregs(mmc_priv(mmc));
@@ -101,7 +130,7 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_7216 = {
.set_clock = sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock,
.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
.reset = sdhci_reset,
- .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
+ .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling,
};
static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_7425 = {
When switching from any MMC speed mode that requires 1.8v (HS200, HS400 and HS400ES) to High Speed (HS) mode, the system ends up configured for SDR12 with a 50MHz clock which is an illegal mode. This happens because the SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180 bit in the SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2 register is left set and when this bit is set, the speed mode is controlled by the SDHCI_CTRL_UHS field in the SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2 register. The SDHCI_CTRL_UHS field will end up being set to 0 (SDR12) by sdhci_set_uhs_signaling() because there is no UHS mode being set. The fix is to change sdhci_set_uhs_signaling() to set the SDHCI_CTRL_UHS field to SDR25 (which is the same as HS) for any switch to HS mode. This was found on a new eMMC controller that does strict checking of the speed mode and the corresponding clock rate. It caused the switch to HS400 mode to fail because part of the sequence to switch to HS400 requires a switch from HS200 to HS before going to HS400. This issue was previously fixed by commit c894e33ddc191 ("mmc: sdhci: Fix incorrect switch to HS mode") and later removed by commit 07bcc411567c ("Revert \"mmc: sdhci: Fix incorrect switch to HS mode\"") because it caused failures with some SD cards on AM65X systems. The fix will now be done in a platform specific callback instead of common sdhci code. Signed-off-by: Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)