| Message ID | 20200212235443.GA18334@embeddedor.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | stm class: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member | expand |
Hi all, Friendly ping: Who can take this? Thanks -- Gustavo On 2/12/20 17:54, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare > variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], > introduced in C99: > > struct foo { > int stuff; > struct boo array[]; > }; > > By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning > in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which > will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being > inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. > > Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by > this change: > > "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator > may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of > zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] > > This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html > [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 > [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> > --- > drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c > index 4f932a419752..603b4a9969d3 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct stp_policy_node { > unsigned int first_channel; > unsigned int last_channel; > /* this is the one that's exposed to the attributes */ > - unsigned char priv[0]; > + unsigned char priv[]; > }; > > void *stp_policy_node_priv(struct stp_policy_node *pn) >
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c index 4f932a419752..603b4a9969d3 100644 --- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct stp_policy_node { unsigned int first_channel; unsigned int last_channel; /* this is the one that's exposed to the attributes */ - unsigned char priv[0]; + unsigned char priv[]; }; void *stp_policy_node_priv(struct stp_policy_node *pn)
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> --- drivers/hwtracing/stm/policy.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)