From patchwork Wed Mar 4 16:25:55 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Cristian Marussi X-Patchwork-Id: 11420401 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE039174A for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C91322522 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="lNd2+gEe" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9C91322522 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=IPjcbGe2Ik4D27oTTWJ1zyJWL2Kapebtrsw8nU8RyQM=; b=lNd2+gEespCXVBf+qJgmjabVTF pHw53ofV6U9f1W/trpBf0YuNq49zQGYSXUGWVqPIYSNS5RuscKx7NB2BNlzU7c995w3753c/iOiwK DYL8JIkBecxNex90IOh9pNQIsz23lJbKaUUruD5XoouCOxBPi+XnjG/Y9RCE/+9G/Aq2grmul15in q9Ik7AoTO9LNrXAnr4U9e6Xoum/+efxP3I/ZDf9FOjlNQ8LPCLEIN1whOCcjji0x6Kr2Yp2zKka1K Bye9QsUxMcQMajVT63q/VNq7IXYIxzvh01QNlO7+hcxJuoZ/YLe1Jg2vhkdy7iVSXptl+CKfkXjTy GWNnbehg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j9Wtn-0005hl-HM; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 16:29:31 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j9WrB-00034V-Ik for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 16:26:52 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63CB1063; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:26:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from e120937-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e120937-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.50]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C531F3F6CF; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:26:47 -0800 (PST) From: Cristian Marussi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v4 10/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Perf notifications support Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:25:55 +0000 Message-Id: <20200304162558.48836-11-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200304162558.48836-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> References: <20200304162558.48836-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200304_082650_036922_3B49C973 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.85 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.3 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.140.110.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Make SCMI Perf protocol register with the notification core. Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi --- V3 --> V4 - scmi_event field renamed V2 --> V3 - added handle awareness V1 --> V2 - simplified .set_notify_enabled() implementation moving the ALL_SRCIDs logic out of protocol. ALL_SRCIDs logic is now in charge of the notification core, together with proper reference counting of enables - switched to devres protocol-registration --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 15 ++++ 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c index 88509ec637d0..1187cff7ed16 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include #include "common.h" +#include "notify.h" enum scmi_performance_protocol_cmd { PERF_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES = 0x3, @@ -86,6 +87,19 @@ struct scmi_perf_notify_level_or_limits { __le32 notify_enable; }; +struct scmi_perf_limits_notify_payld { + __le32 agent_id; + __le32 domain_id; + __le32 range_max; + __le32 range_min; +}; + +struct scmi_perf_level_notify_payld { + __le32 agent_id; + __le32 domain_id; + __le32 performance_level; +}; + struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_describe_levels { __le16 num_returned; __le16 num_remaining; @@ -158,6 +172,11 @@ struct scmi_perf_info { struct perf_dom_info *dom_info; }; +static enum scmi_performance_protocol_cmd evt_2_cmd[] = { + PERF_NOTIFY_LIMITS, + PERF_NOTIFY_LEVEL, +}; + static int scmi_perf_attributes_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_perf_info *pi) { @@ -488,6 +507,29 @@ static int scmi_perf_level_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain, return scmi_perf_mb_level_get(handle, domain, level, poll); } +static int scmi_perf_level_limits_notify(const struct scmi_handle *handle, + u32 domain, int message_id, + bool enable) +{ + int ret; + struct scmi_xfer *t; + struct scmi_perf_notify_level_or_limits *notify; + + ret = scmi_xfer_get_init(handle, message_id, SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, + sizeof(*notify), 0, &t); + if (ret) + return ret; + + notify = t->tx.buf; + notify->domain = cpu_to_le32(domain); + notify->notify_enable = enable ? cpu_to_le32(BIT(0)) : 0; + + ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t); + + scmi_xfer_put(handle, t); + return ret; +} + static bool scmi_perf_fc_size_is_valid(u32 msg, u32 size) { if ((msg == PERF_LEVEL_GET || msg == PERF_LEVEL_SET) && size == 4) @@ -710,6 +752,88 @@ static struct scmi_perf_ops perf_ops = { .est_power_get = scmi_dvfs_est_power_get, }; +static bool scmi_perf_set_notify_enabled(const struct scmi_handle *handle, + u8 evt_id, u32 src_id, bool enable) +{ + int ret, cmd_id; + + cmd_id = MAP_EVT_TO_ENABLE_CMD(evt_id, evt_2_cmd); + if (cmd_id < 0) + return false; + + ret = scmi_perf_level_limits_notify(handle, src_id, cmd_id, enable); + if (ret) + pr_warn("SCMI Notifications - Proto:%X - FAIL_ENABLED - evt[%X] dom[%d] - ret:%d\n", + SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, evt_id, src_id, ret); + + return !ret ? true : false; +} + +static void *scmi_perf_fill_custom_report(u8 evt_id, u64 timestamp, + const void *payld, size_t payld_sz, + void *report, u32 *src_id) +{ + void *rep = NULL; + + switch (evt_id) { + case PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_CHANGED: + { + const struct scmi_perf_limits_notify_payld *p = payld; + struct scmi_perf_limits_report *r = report; + + if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz) + break; + + r->timestamp = timestamp; + r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id); + r->domain_id = le32_to_cpu(p->domain_id); + r->range_max = le32_to_cpu(p->range_max); + r->range_min = le32_to_cpu(p->range_min); + *src_id = r->domain_id; + rep = r; + break; + } + case PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_CHANGED: + { + const struct scmi_perf_level_notify_payld *p = payld; + struct scmi_perf_level_report *r = report; + + if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz) + break; + + r->timestamp = timestamp; + r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id); + r->domain_id = le32_to_cpu(p->domain_id); + r->performance_level = le32_to_cpu(p->performance_level); + *src_id = r->domain_id; + rep = r; + break; + } + default: + break; + } + + return rep; +} + +static const struct scmi_event perf_events[] = { + { + .id = PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_CHANGED, + .max_payld_sz = 16, + .max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_perf_limits_report), + }, + { + .id = PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_CHANGED, + .max_payld_sz = 12, + .max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_perf_level_report), + }, +}; + +static const struct scmi_protocol_event_ops perf_event_ops = { + .set_notify_enabled = scmi_perf_set_notify_enabled, + .fill_custom_report = scmi_perf_fill_custom_report, +}; + static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *handle) { int domain; @@ -742,6 +866,12 @@ static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *handle) scmi_perf_domain_init_fc(handle, domain, &dom->fc_info); } + scmi_register_protocol_events(handle, + SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, PAGE_SIZE, + &perf_event_ops, perf_events, + ARRAY_SIZE(perf_events), + pinfo->num_domains); + pinfo->version = version; handle->perf_ops = &perf_ops; handle->perf_priv = pinfo; diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h index baa117f9eda3..5e7c28c8bcac 100644 --- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h +++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h @@ -392,4 +392,19 @@ struct scmi_power_state_change_requested_report { u32 power_state; }; +struct scmi_perf_limits_report { + ktime_t timestamp; + u32 agent_id; + u32 domain_id; + u32 range_max; + u32 range_min; +}; + +struct scmi_perf_level_report { + ktime_t timestamp; + u32 agent_id; + u32 domain_id; + u32 performance_level; +}; + #endif /* _LINUX_SCMI_PROTOCOL_H */