From patchwork Sat Mar 7 02:14:26 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xiaowei Bao X-Patchwork-Id: 11424993 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E0A138D for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 02:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0062206E6 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 02:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Ip5Kxp7Z" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C0062206E6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nxp.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=hr2dMNox3/eel9wDTisy9vEhIY3cyFBBDCGsUj98b/Q=; b=Ip5Kxp7Zi9P2XjLQzYHP4UOFs6 1e00bfXi+2D3GFq2DhhfQLbl+i00oFf54EAiAvyjmZY3IpP0iBIc0pb4cC4W9vnW0J7hfu7KllTuH ZioFOSA9Zs1/MQcI9Mi4OW4IDfJyiQdK33u9DT6WmTT1EDACCpFUywBrl5B7pRuoHLmiaSN6vssM8 y8WusFcMIyqefprkIvtkIYKd6ZnDXhxVJfOHc7/mTQVtdU4I/kYuE7a9PFMRXBdZH5bHH6TL4UiA7 CdoJUaI0VO3o7RzWbaxR9gdHGU6FlNSzdPOu+OVaUGr8iUWa0swGI7lP9So9IYxAAt/dB+K6joeK7 ULTOTw2Q==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jAPCr-0003ZP-8f; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 02:28:49 +0000 Received: from inva021.nxp.com ([92.121.34.21]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jAPCd-0003NA-8n for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 02:28:36 +0000 Received: from inva021.nxp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inva021.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7364200DCE; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 03:28:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com [165.114.16.14]) by inva021.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B43A200119; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 03:28:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from titan.ap.freescale.net (titan.ap.freescale.net [10.192.208.233]) by invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C71402FA; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 10:28:11 +0800 (SGT) From: Xiaowei Bao To: Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com, Minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, bhelgaas@google.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, leoyang.li@nxp.com, kishon@ti.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, roy.zang@nxp.com, amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk, jingoohan1@gmail.com, gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v5 07/11] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting capability with different PEX Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 10:14:26 +0800 Message-Id: <20200307021430.36826-8-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.5 In-Reply-To: <20200307021430.36826-1-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> References: <20200307021430.36826-1-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200306_182835_584928_61B63CEC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.33 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.3 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [92.121.34.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Xiaowei Bao MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI capability, make it more flexible. Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao --- v2: - Remove the repeated assignment code. v3: - Use ep_func msi_cap and msix_cap to decide the msi_capable and msix_capable of pci_epc_features struct. v4: - No change. v5: - No change. drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c index 0691d9a..9601f9c 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct ls_pcie_ep { struct dw_pcie *pci; + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc; }; #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev) @@ -40,26 +41,31 @@ static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = { { }, }; -static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = { - .linkup_notifier = false, - .msi_capable = true, - .msix_capable = false, - .bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4), -}; - static const struct pci_epc_features* ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) { - return &ls_pcie_epc_features; + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci); + + return pcie->ls_epc; } static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) { struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci); + struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func; enum pci_barno bar; + ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, 0); + if (!ep_func) + return; + for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar); + + pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep_func->msi_cap ? true : false; + pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep_func->msix_cap ? true : false; } static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, @@ -119,6 +125,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct dw_pcie *pci; struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie; + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc; struct resource *dbi_base; int ret; @@ -130,6 +137,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!pci) return -ENOMEM; + ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ls_epc) + return -ENOMEM; + dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "regs"); pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base); if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base)) @@ -140,6 +151,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops; pcie->pci = pci; + ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4), + + pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc; + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie); ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);