diff mbox series

[v2] ACPI/IORT: take _DMA methods into account for named components

Message ID 20200420092753.9819-1-ardb@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Mainlined
Commit 7fb89e1d44cb6aec342e5cca6ed6371d818a428c
Headers show
Series [v2] ACPI/IORT: take _DMA methods into account for named components | expand

Commit Message

Ard Biesheuvel April 20, 2020, 9:27 a.m. UTC
Where IORT nodes for named components can describe simple DMA limits
expressed as the number of address bits a device can drive, _DMA methods
in AML can express more complex topologies, involving DMA translation in
particular.

Currently, we only take this _DMA method into account if it appears on a
ACPI device node describing a PCIe root complex, but it is perfectly
acceptable to use them for named components as well, so let's ensure
we take them into account in those cases too.

Note that such named components are expected to reside under a
pseudo-bus node such as the ACPI0004 container device, which should be
providing the _DMA method as well as a _CRS (as mandated by the ACPI
spec). This is not enforced by the code however.

Reported-by: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@vmware.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Will Deacon April 28, 2020, 5:21 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:27:53 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Where IORT nodes for named components can describe simple DMA limits
> expressed as the number of address bits a device can drive, _DMA methods
> in AML can express more complex topologies, involving DMA translation in
> particular.
> 
> Currently, we only take this _DMA method into account if it appears on a
> ACPI device node describing a PCIe root complex, but it is perfectly
> acceptable to use them for named components as well, so let's ensure
> we take them into account in those cases too.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/acpi), thanks!

[1/1] ACPI/IORT: take _DMA methods into account for named components
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/7fb89e1d44cb

Cheers,
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
index ed3d2d1a7ae9..07eb78baf198 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
@@ -1146,13 +1146,10 @@  void iort_dma_setup(struct device *dev, u64 *dma_addr, u64 *dma_size)
 	else
 		size = 1ULL << 32;
 
-	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
-		ret = acpi_dma_get_range(dev, &dmaaddr, &offset, &size);
-		if (ret == -ENODEV)
-			ret = rc_dma_get_range(dev, &size);
-	} else {
-		ret = nc_dma_get_range(dev, &size);
-	}
+	ret = acpi_dma_get_range(dev, &dmaaddr, &offset, &size);
+	if (ret == -ENODEV)
+		ret = dev_is_pci(dev) ? rc_dma_get_range(dev, &size)
+				      : nc_dma_get_range(dev, &size);
 
 	if (!ret) {
 		/*