diff mbox series

[v3,2/2] soc: ti: add k3 platforms chipid module driver

Message ID 20200508100100.20740-3-grygorii.strashko@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series soc: ti: add k3 platforms chipid module driver | expand

Commit Message

Grygorii Strashko May 8, 2020, 10:01 a.m. UTC
The Texas Instruments K3 Multicore SoC platforms have chipid module which
is represented by CTRLMMR_xxx_JTAGID register and contains information
about SoC id and revision.
 Bits:
  31-28 VARIANT Device variant
  27-12 PARTNO  Part number
  11-1  MFG     Indicates TI as manufacturer (0x17)
  1             Always 1

This patch adds corresponding driver to identify the TI K3 SoC family and
revision, and registers this information with the SoC bus. It is available
under /sys/devices/soc0/ for user space, and can be checked, where needed,
in Kernel using soc_device_match().

Identification is done by:
- checking MFG to be TI ID
 - retrieving Device variant (revision)
 - retrieving Part number and convert it to the family
 - retrieving machine from DT "/model"

Example J721E:
  # cat /sys/devices/soc0/{machine,family,revision}
  Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC
  J721E
  SR1.0

Example AM65x:
  # cat /sys/devices/soc0/{machine,family,revision}
  Texas Instruments AM654 Base Board
  AM65X
  SR1.0

Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
---
 drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig      |  10 +++
 drivers/soc/ti/Makefile     |   1 +
 drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 151 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c

Comments

Arnd Bergmann May 8, 2020, 10:17 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 12:01 PM Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:

> +static int __init k3_chipinfo_init(void)
> +{
> +       struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> +       struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> +       struct device_node *node;
> +       struct regmap *regmap;
> +       u32 partno_id;
> +       u32 variant;
> +       u32 jtag_id;
> +       u32 mfg;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,am654-chipid");
> +       if (!node)
> +               return -ENODEV;

This will fail the initcall and print a warning when the kernel runs on any
other SoC. Would it be possible to just make this a platform_driver?

If not, I think you should silently return success when the device
node is absent.

       Arnd
Grygorii Strashko May 11, 2020, 11:11 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Arnd,

On 09/05/2020 01:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 12:01 PM Grygorii Strashko
> <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
> 
>> +static int __init k3_chipinfo_init(void)
>> +{
>> +       struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> +       struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>> +       struct device_node *node;
>> +       struct regmap *regmap;
>> +       u32 partno_id;
>> +       u32 variant;
>> +       u32 jtag_id;
>> +       u32 mfg;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,am654-chipid");
>> +       if (!node)
>> +               return -ENODEV;
> 
> This will fail the initcall and print a warning when the kernel runs on any
> other SoC. Would it be possible to just make this a platform_driver?
> 
> If not, I think you should silently return success when the device
> node is absent.

Thank you for your report.
Can' make it platform drv., as te SoC info need to be accessible by divers early.
I'll fix it to return success.
Arnd Bergmann May 11, 2020, 12:43 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:11 PM Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 09/05/2020 01:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 12:01 PM Grygorii Strashko
> > <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +static int __init k3_chipinfo_init(void)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> >> +       struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> >> +       struct device_node *node;
> >> +       struct regmap *regmap;
> >> +       u32 partno_id;
> >> +       u32 variant;
> >> +       u32 jtag_id;
> >> +       u32 mfg;
> >> +       int ret;
> >> +
> >> +       node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,am654-chipid");
> >> +       if (!node)
> >> +               return -ENODEV;
> >
> > This will fail the initcall and print a warning when the kernel runs on any
> > other SoC. Would it be possible to just make this a platform_driver?
> >
> > If not, I think you should silently return success when the device
> > node is absent.
>
> Thank you for your report.
> Can' make it platform drv., as the SoC info need to be accessible by divers early.

Which drivers in particular? In most cases you should be able to still do this
right by relying on initcall ordering as long as this one can only be built-in
(or possibly only a module for compile-testing).

      Arnd
Grygorii Strashko May 11, 2020, 8:02 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Arnd,

On 11/05/2020 15:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:11 PM Grygorii Strashko
> <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> On 09/05/2020 01:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 12:01 PM Grygorii Strashko
>>> <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +static int __init k3_chipinfo_init(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>>>> +       struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>>>> +       struct device_node *node;
>>>> +       struct regmap *regmap;
>>>> +       u32 partno_id;
>>>> +       u32 variant;
>>>> +       u32 jtag_id;
>>>> +       u32 mfg;
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +       node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,am654-chipid");
>>>> +       if (!node)
>>>> +               return -ENODEV;
>>>
>>> This will fail the initcall and print a warning when the kernel runs on any
>>> other SoC. Would it be possible to just make this a platform_driver?
>>>
>>> If not, I think you should silently return success when the device
>>> node is absent.
>>
>> Thank you for your report.
>> Can' make it platform drv., as the SoC info need to be accessible by divers early.
> 
> Which drivers in particular? In most cases you should be able to still do this
> right by relying on initcall ordering as long as this one can only be built-in
> (or possibly only a module for compile-testing).

Thanks for you review.

As I'm aware of right now, it's going to be: ringacc, dma, net drv and mmc.
So, It seems should work with platform_driver and subsys_initcall.
I'll try it.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig
index 4486e055794c..e192fb788836 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig
@@ -91,6 +91,16 @@  config TI_K3_RINGACC
 	  and a consumer. There is one RINGACC module per NAVSS on TI AM65x SoCs
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
+config TI_K3_SOCINFO
+	bool
+	depends on ARCH_K3 || COMPILE_TEST
+	select SOC_BUS
+	select MFD_SYSCON
+	help
+	  Include support for the SoC bus socinfo for the TI K3 Multicore SoC
+	  platforms to provide information about the SoC family and
+	  variant to user space.
+
 endif # SOC_TI
 
 config TI_SCI_INTA_MSI_DOMAIN
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/Makefile b/drivers/soc/ti/Makefile
index bec827937a5f..1110e5c98685 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/Makefile
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@  obj-$(CONFIG_WKUP_M3_IPC)		+= wkup_m3_ipc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SCI_PM_DOMAINS)		+= ti_sci_pm_domains.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SCI_INTA_MSI_DOMAIN)	+= ti_sci_inta_msi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_RINGACC)		+= k3-ringacc.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_SOCINFO)		+= k3-socinfo.o
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..57c6bde7adf5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * TI K3 SoC info driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
+
+#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_REG		0
+/*
+ * Bits:
+ *  31-28 VARIANT	Device variant
+ *  27-12 PARTNO	Part number
+ *  11-1  MFG		Indicates TI as manufacturer (0x17)
+ *  1			Always 1
+ */
+#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_VARIANT_SHIFT	(28)
+#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_VARIANT_MASK	GENMASK(31, 28)
+
+#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_PARTNO_SHIFT	(12)
+#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_PARTNO_MASK		GENMASK(27, 12)
+
+#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_MFG_SHIFT		(1)
+#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_MFG_MASK		GENMASK(11, 1)
+
+#define CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_MFG_TI		0x17
+
+static const struct k3_soc_id {
+	unsigned int id;
+	const char *family_name;
+} k3_soc_ids[] = {
+	{ 0xBB5A, "AM65X" },
+	{ 0xBB64, "J721E" },
+};
+
+static int __init partno_to_names(unsigned int partno,
+				  struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(k3_soc_ids); i++)
+		if (partno == k3_soc_ids[i].id) {
+			soc_dev_attr->family = k3_soc_ids[i].family_name;
+			return 0;
+		}
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static int __init k3_chipinfo_init(void)
+{
+	struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
+	struct soc_device *soc_dev;
+	struct device_node *node;
+	struct regmap *regmap;
+	u32 partno_id;
+	u32 variant;
+	u32 jtag_id;
+	u32 mfg;
+	int ret;
+
+	node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,am654-chipid");
+	if (!node)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	regmap = device_node_to_regmap(node);
+	of_node_put(node);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(regmap))
+		return PTR_ERR(regmap);
+
+	ret = regmap_read(regmap, CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_REG, &jtag_id);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	mfg = (jtag_id & CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_MFG_MASK) >>
+	       CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_MFG_SHIFT;
+
+	if (mfg != CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_MFG_TI) {
+		pr_err("Invalid MFG SoC\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	variant = (jtag_id & CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_VARIANT_MASK) >>
+		  CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_VARIANT_SHIFT;
+	variant++;
+
+	partno_id = (jtag_id & CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_PARTNO_MASK) >>
+		 CTRLMMR_WKUP_JTAGID_PARTNO_SHIFT;
+
+	soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!soc_dev_attr)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "SR%x.0", variant);
+	if (!soc_dev_attr->revision) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	ret = partno_to_names(partno_id, soc_dev_attr);
+	if (ret) {
+		pr_err("Unknown SoC JTAGID[0x%08X]\n", jtag_id);
+		ret = -ENODEV;
+		goto err_free_rev;
+	}
+
+	node = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+	of_property_read_string(node, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine);
+	of_node_put(node);
+
+	soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
+	if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(soc_dev);
+		goto err_free_rev;
+	}
+
+	pr_info("Family:%s rev:%s JTAGID[0x%08x] Detected\n",
+		soc_dev_attr->family,
+		soc_dev_attr->revision, jtag_id);
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_free_rev:
+	kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
+err:
+	kfree(soc_dev_attr);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+subsys_initcall(k3_chipinfo_init);