From patchwork Wed Jun 24 20:55:46 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Brendan Higgins X-Patchwork-Id: 11624385 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF361392 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23AA8207E8 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="KgXzwk0U"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="P5AXu3Qp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 23AA8207E8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:From:Subject:References:Mime-Version:Message-Id: In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ClEFCSJaZPGI3WMLBcRfjd0eIpGo5xaK4OCQ9JZoNR0=; b=KgXzwk0U8nLALLJPnOkgK1Dgx v6OnRCH0Qm7GkOyQ8oEJ/IwEgTeJN0dDb4HMeeHsgil6ef6xCyWGxR42QI9EOWGzNoxoKEo2vMAQy CHf8wp5ZRmriUrzvsYY/ybnYS359eHqyMUfPjD9sPZjch0ck/uLthfSVwfRu2Wu9Hq5paPSBV+4eb 6GkkGM+ClWOUQt7G9xD4EB514wF28SUx2O/pKXqCTjba4rhj07sooLWwILzkJkPSw4L7+itnEGQPh UmQJ2Dfhn6irowX9+38VU1U1DPqeYmy8jRjvXCviu8i44UmFXdLRt36VCht+LFHVNLL+x+NkU1ruQ fLLlGNYrw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1joCUE-0002U2-64; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 20:59:14 +0000 Received: from mail-qv1-xf4a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f4a]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1joCTR-00022P-2G for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 20:58:26 +0000 Received: by mail-qv1-xf4a.google.com with SMTP id da10so2556075qvb.2 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:58:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=I7yo0yEby7owuH9fjF7jYNE2HNVlDO8rCEj1t0cq5W0=; b=P5AXu3QpqHn80S40NrmgYYI4Mc7UVYu++O/xzJcL4i628UmQU9O+eAjEkw4EPuaHJ6 CG++JqCNHnOzwl+zOs5BZUvuXZjeNXz2WOvm4uufRtGbWP3ZAGXo8h4o3alHX50jRWlN zwcSTqK8TrYeS05krF+CHutg9jnISHDmov3W6yZ+wSlB0TJ0fVRfezXoEX5IfnTkVg2o Ci01L4XPf7KMqzgloSUIQ5HiNaiueVEs5fq8ENCs/mFB0cnWPtkgwj8Im8ieEB1rof6i 2JsXZgqk5Il2GbAgmbaNeQTRDGpuLVfTyFeOJIkb5hup3SaEaDoy2GmxGGNSbur8A8IB 9Jvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=I7yo0yEby7owuH9fjF7jYNE2HNVlDO8rCEj1t0cq5W0=; b=lVkd3hRV2cumBlhFUJbSmkQUkRhGcLK+I+2QQpG0ceeRR8pCRGzqR332H+KXh7y9OX vTR8tiXCe1vFC/NOvfZecDiszH90bNFI/hrv3L2tfQjnoifpLi3Sv3WeDGLmtPUd+wbR XBLpHBKT/k8jzJcRRFRzZ7Rf6Z1ywNyBo4HlA1AuusKP5SRYEBCJUYhK/cNNq2aphQVU YxHtIrrmgIZUwJvojMM5piqxhePozJBurB1+pIA/Ct4N7WHhv+7dn+Cc5+SOKS8hdOX3 enalc0qcyxfYcGTdr9nZAldEi0ZZuKiyRIaS1paoxZVM0w25CRL6bqV7FK4nO+cp9pMQ 1FNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MjSAipLMZ9Nnn8ySgdj7+Gglmxl2Yi+o5OhxCGWkNLd7jTGb3 rzrGUTa9q+YG5TSkuUqjnuPHCgQrTcVtILX/+dw1qg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxuRK29ERpfOi4lSD1AKlr24E378GidpLS9gMKPqPVrv6sLJ5h9iLdDDykicSL6/+mqMoUkfnz/MS5RbovhvkWTLw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:a6c:: with SMTP id ef12mr13810259qvb.74.1593032301447; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:55:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200624205550.215599-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Message-Id: <20200624205550.215599-8-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20200624205550.215599-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog Subject: [PATCH v4 07/11] kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests From: Brendan Higgins To: jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, arnd@arndb.de, keescook@chromium.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com, yzaikin@google.com, davidgow@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, frowand.list@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, chris@zankel.net, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com X-Spam-Note: CRM114 invocation failed X-Spam-Score: -7.7 (-------) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-7.7 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:f4a listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -7.5 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL From: address is in the default DKIM white-list -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_MED DKIMwl.org - Medium sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins , mcgrof@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, logang@deltatee.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Alan Maguire Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd --- include/kunit/test.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- lib/kunit/Makefile | 3 ++- lib/kunit/executor.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ lib/kunit/test.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) create mode 100644 lib/kunit/executor.c diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 47e61e1d53370..d13965eb624d4 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ size_t kunit_suite_num_test_cases(struct kunit_suite *suite); unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite, struct kunit_case *test_case); -int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite **suites); +int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites); void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites); @@ -237,34 +237,58 @@ void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites); * Registers @suites_list with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for * more information. * - * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means - * that they cannot test anything where tests must run at a different init - * phase. One significant restriction resulting from this is that KUnit - * cannot reliably test anything that is initialize in the late_init phase; - * another is that KUnit is useless to test things that need to be run in - * an earlier init phase. - * - * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules - * do not support multiple late_initcall()s, we need to initialize an - * array of suites for a module. - * - * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Don't run all KUnit tests as - * late_initcalls. I have some future work planned to dispatch all KUnit - * tests from the same place, and at the very least to do so after - * everything else is definitely initialized. + * If a test suite is built-in, module_init() gets translated into + * an initcall which we don't want as the idea is that for builtins + * the executor will manage execution. So ensure we do not define + * module_{init|exit} functions for the builtin case when registering + * suites via kunit_test_suites() below. */ -#define kunit_test_suites(suites_list...) \ - static struct kunit_suite *suites[] = {suites_list, NULL}; \ - static int kunit_test_suites_init(void) \ +#ifdef MODULE +#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) \ + static int __init kunit_test_suites_init(void) \ { \ + struct kunit_suite *suites[] = (__suites); \ return __kunit_test_suites_init(suites); \ } \ - late_initcall(kunit_test_suites_init); \ + module_init(kunit_test_suites_init); \ + \ static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void) \ { \ return __kunit_test_suites_exit(suites); \ } \ module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit) +#else +#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) +#endif /* MODULE */ + +#define __kunit_test_suites(unique_array, unique_suites, ...) \ + static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL }; \ + kunit_test_suites_for_module(unique_array); \ + static struct kunit_suite **unique_suites \ + __used __section(.kunit_test_suites) = unique_array + +/** + * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite + * with KUnit. + * + * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite. + * + * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for + * more information. + * + * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run via executor; this is done + * by placing the array of struct kunit_suite * in the .kunit_test_suites + * ELF section. + * + * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules do not + * support multiple initcall()s, we need to initialize an array of suites for a + * module. + * + */ +#define kunit_test_suites(...) \ + __kunit_test_suites(__UNIQUE_ID(array), \ + __UNIQUE_ID(suites), \ + __VA_ARGS__) #define kunit_test_suite(suite) kunit_test_suites(&suite) diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile index 724b94311ca36..c49f4ffb6273a 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/Makefile +++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += kunit.o kunit-objs += test.o \ string-stream.o \ assert.o \ - try-catch.o + try-catch.o \ + executor.o ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS),y) kunit-objs += debugfs.o diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..7015e7328dce7 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#include + +/* + * These symbols point to the .kunit_test_suites section and are defined in + * include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h, and consequently must be extern. + */ +extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_start[]; +extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[]; + +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) + +static int kunit_run_all_tests(void) +{ + struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites; + + for (suites = __kunit_suites_start; + suites < __kunit_suites_end; + suites++) + __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites); + + return 0; +} + +late_initcall(kunit_run_all_tests); + +#endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */ diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index ccb2ffad8dcfa..918dff400a9d7 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_debugfs_create_suite(suite); } -int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite **suites) +int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites) { unsigned int i;