From patchwork Fri Jul 10 13:06:56 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Will Deacon X-Patchwork-Id: 11656559 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4337E13B4 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BDD32077D for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="hghCZrjS"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="utftJ7LB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1BDD32077D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=2LhPGsrk9LRhw15WAcaE25+drfs4GumUKVQAS9rmC4I=; b=hghCZrjSeKoQSiEmIHmlGAnv4 TMOnvbWpqueZBggoMQS/JgKsLZr+dWMxcSvAf7V7c7UUELsD9DR5eXg0K7TUe0Ie53DpOjoAEiIob Eb7/0scz6VvCT5xLv7WWJ2iINcaqxs2NzBhTDhjcUM29huBzorwCKc6FnS07fhmjQY2Xln9Kz2PRI SvEkV4zRAE6sK33PiOymdlsUMI79Pt579dDs0WmVsvQloCvFX19d4YdYir3MSb9C1IOBjYm8aOfDu cUEZ4DfR4skHtp8t7MYVQf2GaddwC4813WkAXV7yaX0Bk4ccH2OclyUWmTkih0wDqJlKIIUQoFaTZ AMKY+GGzw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jtskG-0000vf-9y; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:07:16 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jtskB-0000uC-79 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:07:12 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 253282077D; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:07:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594386430; bh=6hqWKhwopvNh8McOXsr4biewZT1rCi9y+XBPrJC/RVE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=utftJ7LBbRM6i4bOL8lFYOnzN0w572EEhYAtbuLr2k7Gt+r50nMhQcZ/uSBd4dCqs GrSPi80xcIyQyN0GfPzV7SZFo0Y3RH1uhl40B+9V22ELqbyQXyHPLo+cE586eYPo0H LjyzcsUDVPYf7M2cnU0mDO/att/YVndrmCMfVxF8= From: Will Deacon To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: ptrace: Consistently use pseudo-singlestep exceptions Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:06:56 +0100 Message-Id: <20200710130702.30658-2-will@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200710130702.30658-1-will@kernel.org> References: <20200710130702.30658-1-will@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200710_090711_378534_116FF5E4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.53 ) X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-5.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [198.145.29.99 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Luis Machado , Kees Cook , Will Deacon , catalin.marinas@arm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Keno Fischer , kernel-team@android.com Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Although the arm64 single-step state machine can be fast-forwarded in cases where we wish to generate a SIGTRAP without actually executing an instruction, this has two major limitations outside of simply skipping an instruction due to emulation. 1. Stepping out of a ptrace signal stop into a signal handler where SIGTRAP is blocked. Fast-forwarding the stepping state machine in this case will result in a forced SIGTRAP, with the handler reset to SIG_DFL. 2. The hardware implicitly fast-forwards the state machine when executing an SVC instruction for issuing a system call. This can interact badly with subsequent ptrace stops signalled during the execution of the system call (e.g. SYSCALL_EXIT or seccomp traps), as they may corrupt the stepping state by updating the PSTATE for the tracee. Resolve both of these issues by injecting a pseudo-singlestep exception on entry to a signal handler and also on return to userspace following a system call. Cc: Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Luis Machado Reported-by: Keno Fischer Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 + arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------ arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 11 ++--------- arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h index 6ea8b6a26ae9..5e784e16ee89 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk); #define _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_EMU) #define _TIF_UPROBE (1 << TIF_UPROBE) #define _TIF_FSCHECK (1 << TIF_FSCHECK) +#define _TIF_SINGLESTEP (1 << TIF_SINGLESTEP) #define _TIF_32BIT (1 << TIF_32BIT) #define _TIF_SVE (1 << TIF_SVE) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c index 68b7f34a08f5..057d4aa1af4d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -1818,12 +1818,23 @@ static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, saved_reg = regs->regs[regno]; regs->regs[regno] = dir; - if (dir == PTRACE_SYSCALL_EXIT) + if (dir == PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER) { + if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) + forget_syscall(regs); + regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg; + } else if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)) { tracehook_report_syscall_exit(regs, 0); - else if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) - forget_syscall(regs); + regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg; + } else { + regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg; - regs->regs[regno] = saved_reg; + /* + * Signal a pseudo-step exception since we are stepping but + * tracer modifications to the registers may have rewound the + * state machine. + */ + tracehook_report_syscall_exit(regs, 1); + } } int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) @@ -1851,12 +1862,14 @@ int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs) { + unsigned long flags = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags); + audit_syscall_exit(regs); - if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)) + if (flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT) trace_sys_exit(regs, regs_return_value(regs)); - if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) + if (flags & (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SINGLESTEP)) tracehook_report_syscall(regs, PTRACE_SYSCALL_EXIT); rseq_syscall(regs); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c index 801d56cdf701..3b4f31f35e45 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c @@ -800,7 +800,6 @@ static void setup_restart_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs) */ static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs) { - struct task_struct *tsk = current; sigset_t *oldset = sigmask_to_save(); int usig = ksig->sig; int ret; @@ -824,14 +823,8 @@ static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs) */ ret |= !valid_user_regs(®s->user_regs, current); - /* - * Fast forward the stepping logic so we step into the signal - * handler. - */ - if (!ret) - user_fastforward_single_step(tsk); - - signal_setup_done(ret, ksig, 0); + /* Step into the signal handler if we are stepping */ + signal_setup_done(ret, ksig, test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)); } /* diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c index 5f5b868292f5..7c14466a12af 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void el0_svc_common(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno, int sc_nr, if (!has_syscall_work(flags) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ)) { local_daif_mask(); flags = current_thread_info()->flags; - if (!has_syscall_work(flags)) { + if (!has_syscall_work(flags) && !(flags & _TIF_SINGLESTEP)) { /* * We're off to userspace, where interrupts are * always enabled after we restore the flags from