From patchwork Tue Aug 11 09:54:36 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Z.Q. Hou" X-Patchwork-Id: 11708973 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604FA739 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36E942075D for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="mPCub4r9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 36E942075D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nxp.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To: From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=/V8m0nbgv70mTr6Hv180zFQzxHALNlGHKX+l+/neq+0=; b=mPCub4r9h33bk0oGQkvWBI/aWu WwJKBx2ATGi8F2vqJyXiUHV/u11t5tM471UVHvTu7b9NiGGMmH3PCSNReAYgzRFcoC9JSV+44N43/ lt/IbQ9oYb/T4bjw0L+o8K21YDSBntruHAapCt4FYzClHQsRFHiA/GkQ6Or5DjhDlwE+A+eIaft69 aw6waIhxHyulD0nWpbjLaIXdM0tAVyQ23tfMMToc9BxGZEUPMGgQr8xSZ9XQ7xC3jApSLthBv+QMK 6sb6eigT6ZHvgKau9WJNy3+sd+Y0k2YY5yTggGq03QQiBlOBFUKihnYDCKv7YAHLlEcAhxa7gnxDU /FKg8xIA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k5R7G-0003kz-QA; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:02:46 +0000 Received: from inva021.nxp.com ([92.121.34.21]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k5R6j-0003Wi-Nn for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:02:15 +0000 Received: from inva021.nxp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inva021.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4792201F22; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:02:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com [165.114.16.14]) by inva021.eu-rdc02.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465F2201EEF; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:02:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (mega.ap.freescale.net [10.192.208.232]) by invc005.ap-rdc01.nxp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13636402A5; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:01:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Zhiqiang Hou To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, leoyang.li@nxp.com, kishon@ti.com, gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, roy.zang@nxp.com, jingoohan1@gmail.com, andrew.murray@arm.com Subject: [PATCHv7 07/12] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting capability with different PEX Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:54:36 +0800 Message-Id: <20200811095441.7636-8-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200811095441.7636-1-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> References: <20200811095441.7636-1-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200811_060214_192063_FF4808E5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.13 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [92.121.34.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, Hou Zhiqiang , Xiaowei Bao , mingkai.hu@nxp.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Xiaowei Bao The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI capability, make it more flexible. Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao Reviewed-by: Rob Herring Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang --- V7: - Rebase the patch without functionality change. .../pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 31 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c index 0691d9ad1356..9601f9c09cb1 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct ls_pcie_ep { struct dw_pcie *pci; + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc; }; #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev) @@ -40,26 +41,31 @@ static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = { { }, }; -static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = { - .linkup_notifier = false, - .msi_capable = true, - .msix_capable = false, - .bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4), -}; - static const struct pci_epc_features* ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) { - return &ls_pcie_epc_features; + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci); + + return pcie->ls_epc; } static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) { struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci); + struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func; enum pci_barno bar; + ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, 0); + if (!ep_func) + return; + for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar); + + pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep_func->msi_cap ? true : false; + pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep_func->msix_cap ? true : false; } static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, @@ -119,6 +125,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct dw_pcie *pci; struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie; + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc; struct resource *dbi_base; int ret; @@ -130,6 +137,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!pci) return -ENOMEM; + ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ls_epc) + return -ENOMEM; + dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "regs"); pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base); if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base)) @@ -140,6 +151,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops; pcie->pci = pci; + ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4), + + pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc; + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie); ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);