Message ID | 20200817033729.10848-4-zhukeqian1@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: arm64: Some fixes and code adjustments for pvtime ST | expand |
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:37:29AM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote: > There is a lock version kvm_write_guest. Use it to simplify code. > > Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c > index f7b52ce..2b24e7f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c > @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ gpa_t kvm_init_stolen_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time init_values = {}; > struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; > u64 base = vcpu->arch.steal.base; > - int idx; > > if (base == GPA_INVALID) > return base; > @@ -66,10 +65,7 @@ gpa_t kvm_init_stolen_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > */ > vcpu->arch.steal.steal = 0; > vcpu->arch.steal.last_steal = current->sched_info.run_delay; > - > - idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu); > - kvm_write_guest(kvm, base, &init_values, sizeof(init_values)); > - srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx); > + kvm_write_guest_lock(kvm, base, &init_values, sizeof(init_values)); > > return base; > } > -- > 1.8.3.1 > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
On 17/08/2020 04:37, Keqian Zhu wrote: > There is a lock version kvm_write_guest. Use it to simplify code. > > Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c > index f7b52ce..2b24e7f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c > @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ gpa_t kvm_init_stolen_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time init_values = {}; > struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; > u64 base = vcpu->arch.steal.base; > - int idx; > > if (base == GPA_INVALID) > return base; > @@ -66,10 +65,7 @@ gpa_t kvm_init_stolen_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > */ > vcpu->arch.steal.steal = 0; > vcpu->arch.steal.last_steal = current->sched_info.run_delay; > - > - idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu); > - kvm_write_guest(kvm, base, &init_values, sizeof(init_values)); > - srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx); > + kvm_write_guest_lock(kvm, base, &init_values, sizeof(init_values)); > > return base; > } >
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c index f7b52ce..2b24e7f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ gpa_t kvm_init_stolen_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time init_values = {}; struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; u64 base = vcpu->arch.steal.base; - int idx; if (base == GPA_INVALID) return base; @@ -66,10 +65,7 @@ gpa_t kvm_init_stolen_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) */ vcpu->arch.steal.steal = 0; vcpu->arch.steal.last_steal = current->sched_info.run_delay; - - idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu); - kvm_write_guest(kvm, base, &init_values, sizeof(init_values)); - srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx); + kvm_write_guest_lock(kvm, base, &init_values, sizeof(init_values)); return base; }
There is a lock version kvm_write_guest. Use it to simplify code. Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)