From patchwork Tue Sep 1 20:55:45 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ionela Voinescu X-Patchwork-Id: 11749471 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3FA138A for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 20:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82EAC207D3 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 20:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="R3740c4Z" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 82EAC207D3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To: From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=8vmShoejiLW0E5/tKLtCjJLC3cQ2d/iI1jg7xC/JX7o=; b=R3740c4ZV9JXrdyyBGrqWF8JJR jijbE2i8vud6kn0KKtL9YPYvaXd0UHxNyCE/EYgfHpPkrzQpnHDWlHxEk/DD+jkzun2T4zf3qzAXI YdIDP+vxGHraBtpdmr8BlbkQT0nhKakYJdw+Rk608OWb90Bl1VQVq2GFZfVCn+pK/3IYYr5Ch+6TY xf/KGxZvZSMwQL30xcb+6SLfooyPmszm9dBMnaTyZRjl24Ib/WSPHC8AzIaFj+sHOEKYgT5h4/rAw FvmP9Le7qmzUDJMtFFbl2tekTjoYbbUTZCpcrKSEmEgIDn9l7YIQ8Gefg/43G/LWOIjqfAUe9kJRA lrJePe3Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kDDKr-00021O-LR; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 20:56:58 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kDDKo-00020C-Vo for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 20:56:55 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FB1113E; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e108754-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e108754-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.199.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D1F7C3F66F; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:56:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Ionela Voinescu To: rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] arch_topology: validate input frequencies to arch_set_freq_scale() Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:55:45 +0100 Message-Id: <20200901205549.30096-2-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200901205549.30096-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> References: <20200901205549.30096-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200901_165655_086247_8222D87D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.68 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.140.110.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ionela.voinescu@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The current frequency passed to arch_set_freq_scale() could end up being 0, signaling an error in setting a new frequency. Also, if the maximum frequency in 0, this will result in a division by 0 error. Therefore, validate these input values before using them for the setting of the frequency scale factor. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Cc: Sudeep Holla Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c index 75f72d684294..42a08ef693ae 100644 --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ void arch_set_freq_scale(struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq, unsigned long scale; int i; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cur_freq || !max_freq)) + return; + /* * If the use of counters for FIE is enabled, just return as we don't * want to update the scale factor with information from CPUFREQ.